threads / discuss / 46

git-pasky file mode handling

Subject: git-pasky file mode handling

## tl;dr

2 messages between Apr 16, 2005 and Apr 16, 2005.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Russell King· Apr 16, 2005, 09:45 UTC · lore
Hi,

It seems that there's something weird going on with the file mode handling. Firstly, some files in the git-pasky repository have mode 0664 while others have 0644.

Having pulled from git-pasky a number of times, with Petr's being the "tracked" repository, I now find that when I do an update-cache --refresh, it complains that the files need updating, despite show-diff showing no differences. Investigating, this appears to be because the file modes are wrong for a number of the files. All my files do not have group write.

I notice in the changelog what appears to be a dependence on the umask. If this is so, please note that git appears to track the file modes, and any dependence upon the umask is likely to screw with this tracking.

-- 
Russell King
Petr Baudis· Apr 16, 2005, 14:56 UTC · re: Russell King · lore

Re: git-pasky file mode handling

Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:45:59AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> told me that...

> Hi,
Hello,
Show 10 quoted lines
> It seems that there's something weird going on with the file mode
> handling.  Firstly, some files in the git-pasky repository have mode
> 0664 while others have 0644.
> 
> Having pulled from git-pasky a number of times, with Petr's being the
> "tracked" repository, I now find that when I do an update-cache --refresh,
> it complains that the files need updating, despite show-diff showing no
> differences.  Investigating, this appears to be because the file modes
> are wrong for a number of the files.  All my files do not have group
> write.

this is was a problem with git apply, which did not apply mode changes correctly until recently. If you have no local changes,

	checkout-cache -f -a
should fix this. Hopefully.
> I notice in the changelog what appears to be a dependence on the umask.
> If this is so, please note that git appears to track the file modes,
> and any dependence upon the umask is likely to screw with this tracking.

I personally don't think I like the mode tracking at all. Some people (Linus?) may want to have group +w. Other people (me) have their default group as 'users', and I definitively don't want everyone to be able to write to the files. :-)

I think we should track only whether the file is executable or not. Linus?

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor

← back to recent threads