# [PATCH] git-bisect.txt: add missing word

2 messages from 2017-04-01 to 2017-04-01. Participants: Quentin Pradet, Junio C Hamano.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/45583

## Quentin Pradet, 2017-04-01 06:40

Subject: [PATCH] git-bisect.txt: add missing word
Message-ID: <20170401064056.56969-1-quentin.pradet@gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20170401064056.56969-1-quentin.pradet%40gmail.com

```
Signed-off-by: Quentin Pradet <quentin.pradet@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
index bdd915a66..90148bb07 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
@@ -137,9 +137,9 @@ respectively, in place of "good" and "bad". (But note that you cannot
 mix "good" and "bad" with "old" and "new" in a single session.)
 
 In this more general usage, you provide `git bisect` with a "new"
-commit has some property and an "old" commit that doesn't have that
-property. Each time `git bisect` checks out a commit, you test if that
-commit has the property. If it does, mark the commit as "new";
+commit that has some property and an "old" commit that doesn't have
+that property. Each time `git bisect` checks out a commit, you test if
+that commit has the property. If it does, mark the commit as "new";
 otherwise, mark it as "old". When the bisection is done, `git bisect`
 will report which commit introduced the property.
 
-- 
2.11.0


```

## Junio C Hamano, 2017-04-01 18:34

Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-bisect.txt: add missing word
Message-ID: <xmqq37dsugcy.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/xmqq37dsugcy.fsf%40gitster.mtv.corp.google.com
In-Reply-To: <20170401064056.56969-1-quentin.pradet@gmail.com>

```
Quentin Pradet <quentin.pradet@gmail.com> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Quentin Pradet <quentin.pradet@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

The updated text is more grammatically correct.  It would have been
better if you avoided wrapping the lines unnecessarily, though.

Thanks.

> diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> index bdd915a66..90148bb07 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> @@ -137,9 +137,9 @@ respectively, in place of "good" and "bad". (But note that you cannot
>  mix "good" and "bad" with "old" and "new" in a single session.)
>  
>  In this more general usage, you provide `git bisect` with a "new"
> -commit has some property and an "old" commit that doesn't have that
> -property. Each time `git bisect` checks out a commit, you test if that
> -commit has the property. If it does, mark the commit as "new";
> +commit that has some property and an "old" commit that doesn't have
> +that property. Each time `git bisect` checks out a commit, you test if
> +that commit has the property. If it does, mark the commit as "new";
>  otherwise, mark it as "old". When the bisection is done, `git bisect`
>  will report which commit introduced the property.

```
