# why patch to the gitk no replay? 3 messages from 2017-03-17 to 2017-04-09. Participants: yanke131415, Jonathan Nieder, Florian Schüller. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/45410 ## yanke131415, 2017-03-17 16:39 Subject: why patch to the gitk no replay? Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/e7d6f518-51aa-92fa-e685-7cde019d6e5b%40gmail.com ``` Hello, I send a patch to gitk project(git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk)with the target email address paulus@ozlabs.org. But several days later No replay of this patch i receive, is the email address i send patch wrong? Anyone who knows? ``` ## Jonathan Nieder, 2017-03-17 16:53 Subject: Re: why patch to the gitk no replay? Message-ID: <20170317165335.GM26789@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20170317165335.GM26789%40aiede.mtv.corp.google.com In-Reply-To: ``` Hi, yanke131415 wrote: > I send a patch to gitk > project(git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk)with the target email address > paulus@ozlabs.org. But several days later No replay of this patch i > receive, is the email address i send patch wrong? Anyone who knows? Sending to this mailing list (and cc-ing Paul) is more likely to work. Hope that helps, Jonathan ``` ## Florian Schüller, 2017-04-09 07:27 Subject: Re: why patch to the gitk no replay? Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CAHdOBFpGsL7k4Y_%3Dg83zveichoRhe%2ByLGukBG7ybrO6VrN%3DiBw%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20170317165335.GM26789@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> ``` My patch submission (already the retry) "[PATCH 0/4] Gitk Inotify support" is also pending since 8th of March. I'm also not sure what I did wrong as I'm not used to those mailing list programming - or if Paul is just very busy On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi, > > yanke131415 wrote: > >> I send a patch to gitk >> project(git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk)with the target email address >> paulus@ozlabs.org. But several days later No replay of this patch i >> receive, is the email address i send patch wrong? Anyone who knows? > > Sending to this mailing list (and cc-ing Paul) is more likely to work. > > Hope that helps, > Jonathan ```