threads / patch / 44762
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] pack bitmaps and incremental packing
David TurnerCleaned up the first patch's test code. Decided to remove the unnecessary checks from the second patch.
David Turner (2): auto gc: don't write bitmaps for incremental repacks repack: die on incremental + write-bitmap-index
builtin/gc.c | 9 ++++++++- builtin/repack.c | 9 +++++++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 5 +++-- t/t6500-gc.sh | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-- 2.8.0.rc4.22.g8ae061a
David Turner[PATCH v3 2/2] repack: die on incremental + write-bitmap-index
The bitmap index only works for single packs, so requesting an incremental repack with bitmap indexes makes no sense.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com> --- builtin/repack.c | 9 +++++++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 8 +++----- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
builtin/repack.c, t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh
diff --git a/builtin/repack.c b/builtin/repack.c index 80dd06b..9c3dd09 100644 --- a/builtin/repack.c +++ b/builtin/repack.c @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ static const char *const git_repack_usage[] = { NULL }; +static const char incremental_bitmap_conflict_error[] = N_( +"Incremental repacks are incompatible with bitmap indexes. Use \n" +"--no-write-bitmap-index or disable the pack.writebitmaps configuration." +); + + static int repack_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb) { if (!strcmp(var, "repack.usedeltabaseoffset")) { @@ -206,6 +212,9 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) if (pack_kept_objects < 0) pack_kept_objects = write_bitmaps; + if (write_bitmaps && !(pack_everything & ALL_INTO_ONE)) + die(incremental_bitmap_conflict_error); + packdir = mkpathdup("%s/pack", get_object_directory()); packtmp = mkpathdup("%s/.tmp-%d-pack", packdir, (int)getpid()); diff --git a/t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh b/t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh index b4c7a6f..424bec7 100755 --- a/t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +++ b/t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh @@ -118,12 +118,10 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch (partial bitmap)' ' test_cmp expect actual ' -test_expect_success 'incremental repack cannot create bitmaps' ' +test_expect_success 'incremental repack fails when bitmaps are requested' ' test_commit more-1 && - find .git/objects/pack -name "*.bitmap" >expect && - git repack -d && - find .git/objects/pack -name "*.bitmap" >actual && - test_cmp expect actual + test_must_fail git repack -d 2>err && + test_i18ngrep "Incremental repacks are incompatible with bitmap" err ' test_expect_success 'incremental repack can disable bitmaps' '
-- 2.8.0.rc4.22.g8ae061a
David Turner[PATCH v3 1/2] auto gc: don't write bitmaps for incremental repacks
When git gc --auto does an incremental repack of loose objects, we do not expect to be able to write a bitmap; it is very likely that objects in the new pack will have references to objects outside of the pack. So we shouldn't try to write a bitmap, because doing so will likely issue a warning.
This warning was making its way into gc.log. When the gc.log was present, future auto gc runs would refuse to run.
Patch by Jeff King. Bug report, test, and commit message by David Turner.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> --- builtin/gc.c | 9 ++++++++- t/t6500-gc.sh | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
builtin/gc.c, t/t6500-gc.sh
diff --git a/builtin/gc.c b/builtin/gc.c index 069950d..331f219 100644 --- a/builtin/gc.c +++ b/builtin/gc.c @@ -191,6 +191,11 @@ static void add_repack_all_option(void) } } +static void add_repack_incremental_option(void) +{ + argv_array_push(&repack, "--no-write-bitmap-index"); +} + static int need_to_gc(void) { /* @@ -208,7 +213,9 @@ static int need_to_gc(void) */ if (too_many_packs()) add_repack_all_option(); - else if (!too_many_loose_objects()) + else if (too_many_loose_objects()) + add_repack_incremental_option(); + else return 0; if (run_hook_le(NULL, "pre-auto-gc", NULL)) diff --git a/t/t6500-gc.sh b/t/t6500-gc.sh index 5d7d414..def2aca 100755 --- a/t/t6500-gc.sh +++ b/t/t6500-gc.sh @@ -43,4 +43,29 @@ test_expect_success 'gc is not aborted due to a stale symref' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'auto gc with too many loose objects does not attempt to create bitmaps' ' + test_config gc.auto 3 && + test_config gc.autodetach false && + test_config pack.writebitmaps true && + # We need to create two object whose sha1s start with 17 + # since this is what git gc counts. As it happens, these + # two blobs will do so. + test_commit 263 && + test_commit 410 && + # Our first gc will create a pack; our second will create a second pack + git gc --auto && + ls .git/objects/pack | grep -v bitmap | sort >existing_packs && + test_commit 523 && + test_commit 790 && + + git gc --auto 2>err && + test_i18ngrep ! "^warning:" err && + ls .git/objects/pack/ | grep -v bitmap | sort >post_packs && + comm --output-delimiter , -1 -3 existing_packs post_packs >new && + comm --output-delimiter , -2 -3 existing_packs post_packs >del && + test_line_count = 0 del && # No packs are deleted + test_line_count = 2 new # There is one new pack and its .idx +' + + test_done
-- 2.8.0.rc4.22.g8ae061a
Jeff KingRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] auto gc: don't write bitmaps for incremental repacks
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 08:08:54PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
> + git gc --auto 2>err && > + test_i18ngrep ! "^warning:" err && > + ls .git/objects/pack/ | grep -v bitmap | sort >post_packs &&
I'm not sure why you omit the bitmap here. It shouldn't change, right? In that case it should not be mentioned by comm, and not impact the counts you check later (and in the off chance that a new .bitmap is created, we'd want to know and fail the test, I would think).
> + comm --output-delimiter , -1 -3 existing_packs post_packs >new && > + comm --output-delimiter , -2 -3 existing_packs post_packs >del &&
I don't think --output-delimiter will be portable beyond GNU comm.
> + test_line_count = 0 del && # No packs are deleted > + test_line_count = 2 new # There is one new pack and its .idx
This logic makes sense (and is much nicer than the previous round).
-Peff