Re: Shouldn't git-ls-files --others use $GIT_DIR?
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 02:37:42PM CET, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> If I do
>
> GIT_DIR=$HOME/projects/<project>/.git git ls-files --others
>
> from, e.g., $HOME, I get a list of all the files in $HOME and its
> subdirectories that aren't in said git repository. Shouldn't --others
> use $GIT_DIR, instead of ".", or am I missing something here?
git-ls-files --others lists untracked files in the current directory by comparing it to the index stored in $GIT_DIR/index and listing files present in the current directory but not in the index.
GIT_DIR is a path to the Git repository the commands should work with, but if they work on working tree, they look at the current directory for it.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
The meaning of Stonehenge in Traflamadorian, when viewed from above, is:
"Replacement part being rushed with all possible speed."