threads / patch / 43398

patchRe: [PATCH] do_for_each_ref: perform the same sanity check for leftovers.

Subject: Re: [PATCH] do_for_each_ref: perform the same sanity check for leftovers.

## tl;dr

3 messages between Nov 19, 2006 and Nov 19, 2006. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 2people: 2as markdown or json

Junio C Hamano· Nov 19, 2006, 06:13 UTC · lore

[PATCH] do_for_each_ref: perform the same sanity check for leftovers.

An earlier commit b37a562a added a check to see if the ref points at a valid object (as a part of 'negative ref' support which we currently do not use), but did so only while iterating over both packed and loose refs, and forgot to apply the same check while iterating over the remaining ones.

We might want to replace the "if null then omit it" check with "eh --- what business does a 0{40} value have here?" complaint later since we currently do not use negative refs, but that is a separate issue.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
---
 * "pickaxe -L'/^static int do_for_each_ref/,+40' refs.c" turns
   out to be a very handy way to find out why a line I am
   interested in is in that shape.
   But it might be even better if it allowed us to say
   '-L/^static int do_for_each_ref/+20,+20'.
Show changes to refs.c +19 −19
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index f003a0b..6abd12f 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -322,6 +322,20 @@ int read_ref(const char *ref, unsigned c
 	return -1;
 }
 
+static inline int do_one_ref(const char *base, each_ref_fn fn, int trim,
+			     void *cb_data, struct ref_list *entry)
+{
+	if (strncmp(base, entry->name, trim))
+		return 0;
+	if (is_null_sha1(entry->sha1))
+		return 0;
+	if (!has_sha1_file(entry->sha1)) {
+		error("%s does not point to a valid object!", entry->name);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	return fn(entry->name + trim, entry->sha1, entry->flag, cb_data);
+}
+
 static int do_for_each_ref(const char *base, each_ref_fn fn, int trim,
 			   void *cb_data)
 {
@@ -343,29 +357,15 @@ static int do_for_each_ref(const char *b
 			entry = packed;
 			packed = packed->next;
 		}
-		if (strncmp(base, entry->name, trim))
-			continue;
-		if (is_null_sha1(entry->sha1))
-			continue;
-		if (!has_sha1_file(entry->sha1)) {
-			error("%s does not point to a valid object!", entry->name);
-			continue;
-		}
-		retval = fn(entry->name + trim, entry->sha1,
-			    entry->flag, cb_data);
+		retval = do_one_ref(base, fn, trim, cb_data, entry);
 		if (retval)
 			return retval;
 	}
 
-	packed = packed ? packed : loose;
-	while (packed) {
-		if (!strncmp(base, packed->name, trim)) {
-			retval = fn(packed->name + trim, packed->sha1,
-				    packed->flag, cb_data);
-			if (retval)
-				return retval;
-		}
-		packed = packed->next;
+	for (packed = packed ? packed : loose; packed; packed = packed->next) {
+		retval = do_one_ref(base, fn, trim, cb_data, packed);
+		if (retval)
+			return retval;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
Shawn Pearce· Nov 19, 2006, 06:19 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
>  * "pickaxe -L'/^static int do_for_each_ref/,+40' refs.c" turns

What's this pickaxe you speak of? Last I read you deleted it when you renamed git-pickaxe to git-blame.

Have you reinvented git-pickaxe so soon? Maybe we could try using git-longblade next time a new comamnd is being developed? :-)

Junio C Hamano· Nov 19, 2006, 06:22 UTC · re: Shawn Pearce · lore
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
>>  * "pickaxe -L'/^static int do_for_each_ref/,+40' refs.c" turns
>
> What's this pickaxe you speak of?  Last I read you deleted it when
> you renamed git-pickaxe to git-blame.
>
> Have you reinvented git-pickaxe so soon?  Maybe we could try using
> git-longblade next time a new comamnd is being developed?  :-)
Oh, no, I meant "blame".

← back to recent threads