Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:45:51 -0700
> Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Eh, do you mean bisecting asciidoc? I am not seeing the problem
>> with these on a freshly installed FC6:
>
> Yeah.. don't see the problem here either. But assuming there
> is some strange interaction with Horst's environment, bisecting
> would narrow it down. Even though I don't really think bisecting
> will turn up a problem in Git, it might identify the problem in
> the environment..
Horst has a non-working combination that is:
- tip of "master" of the day
- Fedora rawhide i386 (whatever that is -- sorry I am new to RPM world)
- asciidoc 7.0.2 3.fc6
- xmlto 0.0.18 13.1
I have a working combination:
- tip of "master" of the day
- FC6 i386 (freshly installed)
- asciidoc 7.0.2 3.fc6
- xmlto 0.0.18 13.1
So the difference between me and Horst that can be bisected is not what are listed above. I wonder what other things come into the picture.
"rpm -q --requires" tells us that:
- asciidoc wants python >= 2.3
- xmlto wants docbook-dtds, docbook-xsl >= 1.56.0, flex,
libxslt, passivetex >= 1.11, util-linux, w3m
and here is what I have:
asciidoc-7.0.2-3.fc6
xmlto-0.0.18-13.1
python-2.4.3-18.fc6
docbook-dtds-1.0-30.1
package docbook-xsl is not installed
flex-2.5.4a-41.fc6
libxslt-1.1.17-1.1
passivetex-1.25-5.1.1
util-linux-2.13-0.44.fc6
w3m-0.5.1-14.1
"rpm -q --whatprovides docbook-xsl" says:
docbook-style-xsl-1.69.1-5.1
and it is installed on the FC6 box.
Horst H. von Brand
