# [PATCH] Documentation: pack-protocol correct NAK response

2 messages from 2016-07-22 to 2016-07-22. Participants: Stefan Beller, Junio C Hamano.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/42908

## Stefan Beller, 2016-07-22 20:28

Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: pack-protocol correct NAK response
Message-ID: <20160722202820.18688-1-sbeller@google.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20160722202820.18688-1-sbeller%40google.com

```
In the transport protocol we use NAK to signal the non existence of a
common base, so fix the documentation. This helps readers of the document,
as they don't have to wonder about the difference between NAK and NACK.
As NACK is used in git archive and upload-archive, this is easy to get
wrong.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---
 Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
index 8b36343..d40ab65 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ In multi_ack mode:
     ready to make a packfile, it will blindly ACK all 'have' obj-ids
     back to the client.
 
-  * the server will then send a 'NACK' and then wait for another response
+  * the server will then send a 'NAK' and then wait for another response
     from the client - either a 'done' or another list of 'have' lines.
 
 In multi_ack_detailed mode:
-- 
2.9.2.370.g4a59376.dirty


```

## Junio C Hamano, 2016-07-22 20:31

Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: pack-protocol correct NAK response
Message-ID: <CAPc5daXKiGr2CXCkz0D87cYygScVuCOBk40xUM-3O64ki=pXNg@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CAPc5daXKiGr2CXCkz0D87cYygScVuCOBk40xUM-3O64ki%3DpXNg%40mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <20160722202820.18688-1-sbeller@google.com>

```
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
> In the transport protocol we use NAK to signal the non existence of a
> common base, so fix the documentation.

Thanks.

```
