Impoved description + added test
git-stash.sh | 2 +- t/t3903-stash.sh | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
threads / patch / 42354
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] Ignore dirty submodule states during stash
Impoved description + added test
git-stash.sh | 2 +- t/t3903-stash.sh | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Ignore dirty submodule states during stash
As stash does not know how to deal with submodules, it should not try to save/restore their states as it leads to redundant merge conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Vasily Titskiy <qehgt0@gmail.com> --- git-stash.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/git-stash.sh b/git-stash.sh index c7c65e2..b500c44 100755 --- a/git-stash.sh +++ b/git-stash.sh @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ create_stash () { git read-tree --index-output="$TMPindex" -m $i_tree && GIT_INDEX_FILE="$TMPindex" && export GIT_INDEX_FILE && - git diff --name-only -z HEAD -- >"$TMP-stagenames" && + git diff --name-only --ignore-submodules -z HEAD -- >"$TMP-stagenames" && git update-index -z --add --remove --stdin <"$TMP-stagenames" && git write-tree && rm -f "$TMPindex"
-- 2.1.4
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] Ignore dirty submodule states during stash
It checks if 'stash pop' does not trigger merge conflics in submodules. --- t/t3903-stash.sh | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t3903-stash.sh b/t/t3903-stash.sh index 2142c1f..e48a5b5 100755 --- a/t/t3903-stash.sh +++ b/t/t3903-stash.sh @@ -731,4 +731,39 @@ test_expect_success 'stash list --cc shows combined diff' ' test_cmp expect actual ' +test_expect_success 'stash ignores changes in submodules' ' + git submodule init && + git init sub1 && + ( + cd sub1 && + echo "x" > file1 && + git add file1 && + git commit -a -m "initial sub1" + ) && + git submodule add ./. sub1 && + echo "main" > file1 && + git add file1 && + git commit -a -m "initial main" && + # make changes in submodule + ( + cd sub1 && + echo "y" >> file1 && + git commit -a -m "change y" + ) && + git commit sub1 -m "update reference" && + # switch submodule to another revision + ( + cd sub1 && + echo "z" >> file1 && + git commit -a -m "change z" + ) && + # everything is prepared, check if changes in submodules are ignored + echo "local change" >> file1 && + git stash save && + git checkout HEAD~1 && + git submodule update && + git stash pop +' + + test_done
-- 2.1.4
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] Ignore dirty submodule states during stash
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Vasily Titskiy <qehgt0@gmail.com> wrote:
> It checks if 'stash pop' does not trigger merge conflics > in submodules.
Missing sign-off.
Also, it would be best to combine these two patches so that the fix and patch reside in a single patch.
More below...
> --- > diff --git a/t/t3903-stash.sh b/t/t3903-stash.sh > @@ -731,4 +731,39 @@ test_expect_success 'stash list --cc shows combined diff' ' > +test_expect_success 'stash ignores changes in submodules' ' > + git submodule init && > + git init sub1 && > + ( > + cd sub1 && > + echo "x" > file1 &&
Style: Drop space after redirection operator: >file1
Ditto below for both '>' and '>>'.
> + git add file1 && > + git commit -a -m "initial sub1" > + ) && > + git submodule add ./. sub1 && > + echo "main" > file1 && > + git add file1 && > + git commit -a -m "initial main" && > + # make changes in submodule > + ( > + cd sub1 && > + echo "y" >> file1 && > + git commit -a -m "change y" > + ) && > + git commit sub1 -m "update reference" && > + # switch submodule to another revision > + ( > + cd sub1 && > + echo "z" >> file1 && > + git commit -a -m "change z" > + ) && > + # everything is prepared, check if changes in submodules are ignored > + echo "local change" >> file1 && > + git stash save && > + git checkout HEAD~1 && > + git submodule update && > + git stash pop > +' > + > +
Style: drop extra blank line
> test_done > -- > 2.1.4