threads / discuss / 41507

git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

Subject: git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

## tl;dr

9 messages between Feb 24, 2016 and Feb 26, 2016.

replies: 8people: 5as markdown or json

Bill Okara· Feb 24, 2016, 23:38 UTC · lore
Hi,

I noticed the following 'git mv' issue with: git version 2.6.4

If there are identical files in different subfolders, 'git mv' the
root folder (and/or each file individually) will mess up the file path
mapping. that is, if having identical 'content.txt' file under
gitmvtest
    |--demo/content.txt
    |--dev/content.txt
    |--prod/content.txt

after doing the "git mv gitmvtest/resources gitmvtest/src/main/resources", the 'git status' will show:

renamed: gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt -> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt renamed: gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt -> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt <== NOTE: wrongly mapped the prod/content.txt to dev/content.txt renamed: gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt -> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt <== NOTE: wrongly mapped the dev/content.txt to prod/content.txt

I tried running 'git mv' on each file individually, got the same problem:
> git mv gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
> git mv gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt
> git mv gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt
> git status

renamed: gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt -> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt renamed: gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt -> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt <== WRONG renamed: gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt -> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt <== WRONG

NOTE: ======= if modified the content.txt in the 3 folders to contain different data, then repeating the above 'git mv' will produce correct result,

renamed: gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt -> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt <== CORRECT renamed: gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt -> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt <== CORRECT renamed: gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt -> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt <== CORRECT

just want to see if this is a bug, user error (on my end), or??

Thanks, Bill

Junio C Hamano· Feb 24, 2016, 23:39 UTC · re: Bill Okara · lore

Re: git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

Bill Okara <billokara@gmail.com> writes:
> just want to see if this is a bug, user error (on my end), or??
Not a bug, not a user error, just "it does not matter", I think.
Bill Okara· Feb 24, 2016, 23:51 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

it actually does matter in the following scenario:
1) master branch has identical content.txt files in the folder structure
2) do the git mv in a new branch
3) master branch updated the context.txt to contain new data (more
relevant to the containing folder)
4) new branch need to merge the updates from master

after the merge, demo/content.txt in the new path would contain updates from dev/content.txt from master...

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Bill Okara <billokara@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> just want to see if this is a bug, user error (on my end), or??
>
> Not a bug, not a user error, just "it does not matter", I think.
>
>
Bill Okara· Feb 25, 2016, 00:03 UTC · re: Bill Okara · lore

Re: git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

following are the steps to help illustrate the issue. its actually quite common to have projects include identical placeholder files before update/refactoring...

// Create in master branch
Show 15 quoted lines
> mkdir gittest
> cd gittest
> init
> mkdir -p gitmvtest/resources
> mkdir -p gitmvtest/resources/demo
> mkdir -p gitmvtest/resources/dev
> mkdir -p gitmvtest/resources/prod
> cd gitmvtest/resources/demo/
> echo 'This is the line that contains the common content’ >> content.txt
> cd ..
> cp demo/content.txt dev/.
> cp demo/content.txt prod/.
> cd ../..
> git add .
> git commit -m "master content.txt first commit"
# change to a new branch
> git checkout -b newTestBranch
> mkdir -p gitmvtest/src/main
> git mv gitmvtest/resources gitmvtest/src/main/.
> git commit -m "newTestBranch: mv resources to src/main/resources"
[newTestBranch 5faed26] newTestBranch: mv resources to src/main/resources
 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 rename gitmvtest/{resources/prod => src/main/resources/demo}/content.txt (100%)
 rename gitmvtest/{ => src/main}/resources/dev/content.txt (100%)
 rename gitmvtest/{resources/demo => src/main/resources/prod}/content.txt (100%)
// Change back to master and update the 3 files
Show 6 quoted lines
> git checkout master
> echo 'this is DEMO content' >> gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt
> echo 'this is DEV content' >> gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt
> echo 'this is PROD content' >> gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt
> git add .
> git commit -m "master: update content.txt to include parent folder name"
[master 18d85f9] master: update content.txt to include parent folder name
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
// Change back to the new branch and merge from master
> git checkout newTestBranch
> git merge master

Auto-merging gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt Auto-merging gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt Auto-merging gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt

Merge made by the 'recursive' strategy.
 gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt | 1 +
 gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt  | 1 +
 gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt | 1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

// SEE the ERROR: //demo/content.txt wrongly merged with data from prod/content.txt

> cat gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt

This is the line that contains the common content this is PROD content

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Bill Okara <billokara@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> it actually does matter in the following scenario:
>
> 1) master branch has identical content.txt files in the folder structure
> 2) do the git mv in a new branch
> 3) master branch updated the context.txt to contain new data (more
> relevant to the containing folder)
> 4) new branch need to merge the updates from master
>
> after the merge, demo/content.txt in the new path would contain
> updates from dev/content.txt from master...
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Bill Okara <billokara@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> just want to see if this is a bug, user error (on my end), or??
>>
>> Not a bug, not a user error, just "it does not matter", I think.
>>
>>
Kevin Daudt· Feb 25, 2016, 11:49 UTC · re: Bill Okara · lore

Re: git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:38:11PM -0700, Bill Okara wrote:
Show 56 quoted lines
> Hi,
> 
> I noticed the following 'git mv' issue with:
> git version 2.6.4
> 
> 
> If there are identical files in different subfolders, 'git mv' the
> root folder (and/or each file individually) will mess up the file path
> mapping. that is, if having identical 'content.txt' file under
> gitmvtest
>     |--demo/content.txt
>     |--dev/content.txt
>     |--prod/content.txt
> 
> after doing the "git mv gitmvtest/resources
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources", the 'git status' will show:
> 
> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt ->
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt ->
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt            <== NOTE:
> wrongly mapped the prod/content.txt to dev/content.txt
> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt ->
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt            <== NOTE:
> wrongly mapped the dev/content.txt to prod/content.txt
> 
> I tried running 'git mv' on each file individually, got the same problem:
> > git mv gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
> > git mv gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt
> > git mv gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt
> 
> > git status
> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt ->
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt ->
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt          <== WRONG
> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt ->
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt          <== WRONG
> 
> 
> NOTE:
> =======
> if modified the content.txt in the 3 folders to contain different
> data, then repeating the above 'git mv' will produce correct result,
> 
> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt ->
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt       <== CORRECT
> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt ->
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt             <== CORRECT
> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt ->
> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt          <== CORRECT
> 
> 
> 
> just want to see if this is a bug, user error (on my end), or??
> 

This looks like the same issue as submodule--helper list has: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/287227

Stefan Beller· Feb 25, 2016, 13:56 UTC · re: Kevin Daudt · lore

Re: git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info> wrote:
Show 60 quoted lines
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:38:11PM -0700, Bill Okara wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed the following 'git mv' issue with:
>> git version 2.6.4
>>
>>
>> If there are identical files in different subfolders, 'git mv' the
>> root folder (and/or each file individually) will mess up the file path
>> mapping. that is, if having identical 'content.txt' file under
>> gitmvtest
>>     |--demo/content.txt
>>     |--dev/content.txt
>>     |--prod/content.txt
>>
>> after doing the "git mv gitmvtest/resources
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources", the 'git status' will show:
>>
>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt ->
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt ->
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt            <== NOTE:
>> wrongly mapped the prod/content.txt to dev/content.txt
>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt ->
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt            <== NOTE:
>> wrongly mapped the dev/content.txt to prod/content.txt
>>
>> I tried running 'git mv' on each file individually, got the same problem:
>> > git mv gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
>> > git mv gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt
>> > git mv gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt
>>
>> > git status
>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt ->
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt ->
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt          <== WRONG
>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt ->
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt          <== WRONG
>>
>>
>> NOTE:
>> =======
>> if modified the content.txt in the 3 folders to contain different
>> data, then repeating the above 'git mv' will produce correct result,
>>
>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt ->
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt       <== CORRECT
>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt ->
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt             <== CORRECT
>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt ->
>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt          <== CORRECT
>>
>>
>>
>> just want to see if this is a bug, user error (on my end), or??
>>
>
> This looks like the same issue as submodule--helper list has:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/287227

The submodule--helper is not called from within git-mv, so it may be a similar but not the same issue. ;)

Looking through the code, the pathspec is not treated according to the newest style convention, I think it is one of the last places where the pathspec internals are poked with, instead of using parse_parsespec && match_parsespec. (That said it is very old hence often tested code in the wild. old code != bad code)

Stefan
Bill Okara· Feb 25, 2016, 16:25 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

Re: git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

resent, forgot to reply to all...

I guess a bigger concern of this issue is the mess up of history. That is, even if not doing an merge/update, just doing the 'git mv' will messed up the file history, as shown in following:

// Add a new resources/qa/content.txt files with a new commit message:
> mkdir gitmvtest/resources/qa
> cp gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt gitmvtest/resources/qa/.
> git add .
>git commit -m "Add a new QA context.txt"
[master caba387] Add a new QA context.txt
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
// Do the git mv
> git checkout -b branch5
> git mv gitmvtest/resources gitmvtest/src/main/.
> git commit -m "Move resources to src/main/resources"
[branch5 dd44309] Move resources to src/main/resources
 4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 rename gitmvtest/{resources/qa =>
src/main/resources/demo}/content.txt (100%)    <-- WRONG
 rename gitmvtest/{resources/prod =>
src/main/resources/dev}/content.txt (100%)    <-- WRONG
 rename gitmvtest/{resources/dev =>
src/main/resources/prod}/content.txt (100%)    <-- WRONG
 rename gitmvtest/{resources/demo =>
src/main/resources/qa}/content.txt (100%)   <-- WRONG
// WRONG HISTORY
> git log --follow --oneline  gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt   <== demo/content.txt points to the new QA history

dd44309 Move resources to src/main/resources caba387 Add a new QA context.txt <== WRONG HISTORY

thanks, Bill

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
Show 73 quoted lines
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:38:11PM -0700, Bill Okara wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I noticed the following 'git mv' issue with:
>>> git version 2.6.4
>>>
>>>
>>> If there are identical files in different subfolders, 'git mv' the
>>> root folder (and/or each file individually) will mess up the file path
>>> mapping. that is, if having identical 'content.txt' file under
>>> gitmvtest
>>>     |--demo/content.txt
>>>     |--dev/content.txt
>>>     |--prod/content.txt
>>>
>>> after doing the "git mv gitmvtest/resources
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources", the 'git status' will show:
>>>
>>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt ->
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
>>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt ->
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt            <== NOTE:
>>> wrongly mapped the prod/content.txt to dev/content.txt
>>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt ->
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt            <== NOTE:
>>> wrongly mapped the dev/content.txt to prod/content.txt
>>>
>>> I tried running 'git mv' on each file individually, got the same problem:
>>> > git mv gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
>>> > git mv gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt
>>> > git mv gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt
>>>
>>> > git status
>>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt ->
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt
>>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt ->
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt          <== WRONG
>>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt ->
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt          <== WRONG
>>>
>>>
>>> NOTE:
>>> =======
>>> if modified the content.txt in the 3 folders to contain different
>>> data, then repeating the above 'git mv' will produce correct result,
>>>
>>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt ->
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt       <== CORRECT
>>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/dev/content.txt ->
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/dev/content.txt             <== CORRECT
>>> renamed:    gitmvtest/resources/prod/content.txt ->
>>> gitmvtest/src/main/resources/prod/content.txt          <== CORRECT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> just want to see if this is a bug, user error (on my end), or??
>>>
>>
>> This looks like the same issue as submodule--helper list has:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/287227
>
> The submodule--helper is not called from within git-mv, so it may be
> a similar but not the same issue. ;)
>
> Looking through the code, the pathspec is not treated according to the newest
> style convention, I think it is one of the last places where the
> pathspec internals
> are poked with, instead of using parse_parsespec && match_parsespec.
> (That said it is very old hence often tested code in the wild. old
> code != bad code)
>
> Stefan
SZEDER Gábor· Feb 26, 2016, 11:50 UTC · re: Bill Okara · lore

Re: git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

Hi,
Please don't top-post on this list.
Show 34 quoted lines
> I guess a bigger concern of this issue is the mess up of history. That
> is, even if not doing an merge/update, just doing the 'git mv' will
> messed up the file history, as shown in following:
> 
> 
> // Add a new resources/qa/content.txt files with a new commit message:
> 
> > mkdir gitmvtest/resources/qa
> > cp gitmvtest/resources/demo/content.txt gitmvtest/resources/qa/.
> > git add .
> >git commit -m "Add a new QA context.txt"
> [master caba387] Add a new QA context.txt
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> // Do the git mv
> 
> > git checkout -b branch5
> > git mv gitmvtest/resources gitmvtest/src/main/.
> > git commit -m "Move resources to src/main/resources"
> [branch5 dd44309] Move resources to src/main/resources
>  4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  rename gitmvtest/{resources/qa =>
> src/main/resources/demo}/content.txt (100%)    <-- WRONG
>  rename gitmvtest/{resources/prod =>
> src/main/resources/dev}/content.txt (100%)    <-- WRONG
>  rename gitmvtest/{resources/dev =>
> src/main/resources/prod}/content.txt (100%)    <-- WRONG
>  rename gitmvtest/{resources/demo =>
> src/main/resources/qa}/content.txt (100%)   <-- WRONG
> 
> // WRONG HISTORY
> > git log --follow --oneline  gitmvtest/src/main/resources/demo/content.txt   <== demo/content.txt points to the new QA history
> dd44309 Move resources to src/main/resources
> caba387 Add a new QA context.txt                <== WRONG HISTORY
Git doesn't track copies and renames.

Git only tracks content and infers copies and renames from content changes. For example, if a commit removes path 'A' and adds path 'B' then Git checks whether they both have identical (or very similar) content, and reports this change as a rename if they do. This is not recorded anywhere in the repository, but 'git log --follow <path>' performs this check upon seeing that the path in question doesn't exist in the previous commit.

Anyway, diffcore used to handle your case better, and the patch below restores the original behavior.

 ---- >8 ----
Subject: [PATCH] diffcore: fix iteration order of identical files during rename detection

If the two paths 'dir/A/file' and 'dir/B/file' have identical content and the parent directory is renamed, e.g. 'git mv dir other-dir', then diffcore reports the following exact renames:

    renamed:    dir/B/file -> other-dir/A/file
    renamed:    dir/A/file -> other-dir/B/file

While technically not wrong, this is confusing not only for the user, but also for git commands that make decisions based on rename information, e.g. 'git log --follow'.

This behavior is a side effect of commit v2.0.0-rc4~8^2~14 (diffcore-rename.c: simplify finding exact renames, 2013-11-14): the hashmap storing sources returns entries from the same bucket, i.e. sources matching the current destination, in LIFO order. Thus the iteration first examines 'other-dir/A/file' and 'dir/B/file' and, upon finding identical content and basename, reports an exact rename.

Restore the original behavior by reversing the order of filling the hashmap with source entries.

Reported-by: Bill Okara <billokara@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
---
 diffcore-rename.c      |  6 ++++--
 t/t4001-diff-rename.sh | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/diffcore-rename.c b/diffcore-rename.c
index af1fe08861e6..69fcf77be02d 100644
--- a/diffcore-rename.c
+++ b/diffcore-rename.c
@@ -340,9 +340,11 @@ static int find_exact_renames(struct diff_options *options)
 	int i, renames = 0;
 	struct hashmap file_table;
 
-	/* Add all sources to the hash table */
+	/* Add all sources to the hash table in reverse order, because
+	 * later on they will be retrieved in LIFO order.
+	 */
 	hashmap_init(&file_table, NULL, rename_src_nr);
-	for (i = 0; i < rename_src_nr; i++)
+	for (i = rename_src_nr-1; i >= 0; i--)
 		insert_file_table(&file_table, i, rename_src[i].p->one);
 
 	/* Walk the destinations and find best source match */
diff --git a/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh b/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh
index 2f327b749588..ed90c6c6f984 100755
--- a/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh
+++ b/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh
@@ -77,6 +77,17 @@ test_expect_success 'favour same basenames even with minor differences' '
 	git show HEAD:path1 | sed "s/15/16/" > subdir/path1 &&
 	git status | test_i18ngrep "renamed: .*path1 -> subdir/path1"'
 
+test_expect_success 'two files with same basename and same content' '
+	git reset --hard &&
+	mkdir -p dir/A dir/B &&
+	cp path1 dir/A/file &&
+	cp path1 dir/B/file &&
+	git add dir &&
+	git commit -m 2 &&
+	git mv dir other-dir &&
+	git status | test_i18ngrep "renamed: .*dir/A/file -> other-dir/A/file"
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'setup for many rename source candidates' '
 	git reset --hard &&
 	for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9;
-- 
2.7.2.410.g92cb358
Bill Okara· Feb 26, 2016, 15:48 UTC · re: SZEDER Gábor · lore

Re: git mv messed up file mapping if folders contain identical files

Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:50 AM, SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> wrote:
>
> Please don't top-post on this list.
>
Sorry about that. Just learned what that means and why it is bad...
Show 29 quoted lines
> Subject: [PATCH] diffcore: fix iteration order of identical files during rename detection
>
> If the two paths 'dir/A/file' and 'dir/B/file' have identical content
> and the parent directory is renamed, e.g. 'git mv dir other-dir', then
> diffcore reports the following exact renames:
>
>     renamed:    dir/B/file -> other-dir/A/file
>     renamed:    dir/A/file -> other-dir/B/file
>
> While technically not wrong, this is confusing not only for the user,
> but also for git commands that make decisions based on rename
> information, e.g. 'git log --follow'.
>
> This behavior is a side effect of commit v2.0.0-rc4~8^2~14
> (diffcore-rename.c: simplify finding exact renames, 2013-11-14): the
> hashmap storing sources returns entries from the same bucket, i.e.
> sources matching the current destination, in LIFO order.  Thus the
> iteration first examines 'other-dir/A/file' and 'dir/B/file' and, upon
> finding identical content and basename, reports an exact rename.
>
> Restore the original behavior by reversing the order of filling the
> hashmap with source entries.
>
> Reported-by: Bill Okara <billokara@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
> ---
>  diffcore-rename.c      |  6 ++++--
>  t/t4001-diff-rename.sh | 11 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Show 25 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh b/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh
> index 2f327b749588..ed90c6c6f984 100755
> --- a/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh
> +++ b/t/t4001-diff-rename.sh
> @@ -77,6 +77,17 @@ test_expect_success 'favour same basenames even with minor differences' '
>         git show HEAD:path1 | sed "s/15/16/" > subdir/path1 &&
>         git status | test_i18ngrep "renamed: .*path1 -> subdir/path1"'
>
> +test_expect_success 'two files with same basename and same content' '
> +       git reset --hard &&
> +       mkdir -p dir/A dir/B &&
> +       cp path1 dir/A/file &&
> +       cp path1 dir/B/file &&
> +       git add dir &&
> +       git commit -m 2 &&
> +       git mv dir other-dir &&
> +       git status | test_i18ngrep "renamed: .*dir/A/file -> other-dir/A/file"
> +'
> +
>  test_expect_success 'setup for many rename source candidates' '
>         git reset --hard &&
>         for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9;
> --
> 2.7.2.410.g92cb358
>
Thank you very much for the fix and the detailed explanation!
-Bill

← back to recent threads