# Do you plan to release 2.5.2 any time soon? 3 messages from 2015-09-02 to 2015-09-04. Participants: Johannes Schindelin, Junio C Hamano. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/40254 ## Johannes Schindelin, 2015-09-02 22:40 Subject: Do you plan to release 2.5.2 any time soon? Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/alpine.DEB.1.00.1509030038460.16897%40s15462909.onlinehome-server.info ``` Hi Junio, I have a couple of fixes lined up for bugs in Git for Windows 2.5.1. Do you plan to release 2.5.2 any time soon? If yes, I would hold off, otherwise I will just do a Git for Windows 2.5.1 (Rel 2). Thanks, Dscho ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2015-09-03 19:00 Subject: Re: Do you plan to release 2.5.2 any time soon? Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/xmqqbndjjpk5.fsf%40gitster.mtv.corp.google.com In-Reply-To: ``` Johannes Schindelin writes: > I have a couple of fixes lined up for bugs in Git for Windows 2.5.1. Do > you plan to release 2.5.2 any time soon? If yes, I would hold off, > otherwise I will just do a Git for Windows 2.5.1 (Rel 2). Among the topics marked for possible later merging to 'maint' in the draft release notes to 2.6, candidates for future maintenance snapshots are: * mh/get-remote-group-fix # 4 (2 weeks ago) * cb/open-noatime-clear-errno # 1 (9 days ago) * jk/long-error-messages # 2 (9 days ago) * jh/strbuf-read-use-read-in-full # 1 (9 days ago) * ps/t1509-chroot-test-fixup # 2 (2 weeks ago) * sg/help-group # 1 (8 days ago) * nd/dwim-wildcards-as-pathspecs # 1 (9 days ago) * jk/fix-alias-pager-config-key-warnings # 1 (3 days ago) * jk/rev-list-has-no-notes # 1 (3 days ago) * nd/fixup-linked-gitdir # 1 (2 days ago) * as/docfix-reflog-expire-unreachable # 1 (8 days ago) * sg/t3020-typofix # 1 (8 days ago) * po/po-readme # 1 (8 days ago) * sg/wt-status-header-inclusion # 1 (8 days ago) * ss/fix-config-fd-leak # 1 (8 days ago) * jc/calloc-pathspec # 1 (8 days ago) * rs/archive-zip-many # 3 (2 days ago) * dt/commit-preserve-base-index-upon-opportunistic-cache-tree-update # 1 (2 days ago) * cc/trailers-corner-case-fix # 3 (22 hours ago) * jk/log-missing-default-HEAD # 1 (22 hours ago) * ee/clean-test-fixes # 1 (22 hours ago) These I deem are safe (not just the changes themselves are trivially correct but it is unlikely to make things gravely worse if it turns out there were ramifications no reviewers thought about with them) and can go in 2.5.2. As to other topics that are in 'master' but not in the above list, I do not have doubt about their value (otherwise they would not be in 'master' in the first place), but either they are still too young in 'master' or are with sufficiently big impact on the callchain that it is not entirely implausible that they have risks of unforeseen ramifications and fallouts. Let's aim to tag 2.5.2 soonish, before mid next-week at the latest. ``` ## Johannes Schindelin, 2015-09-04 07:08 Subject: Re: Do you plan to release 2.5.2 any time soon? Message-ID: <4fe75c9abad6fea816812beba72988fc@dscho.org> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/4fe75c9abad6fea816812beba72988fc%40dscho.org In-Reply-To: ``` Hi Junio, On 2015-09-03 21:00, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > >> I have a couple of fixes lined up for bugs in Git for Windows 2.5.1. Do >> you plan to release 2.5.2 any time soon? If yes, I would hold off, >> otherwise I will just do a Git for Windows 2.5.1 (Rel 2). > > Among the topics marked for possible later merging to 'maint' in the > draft release notes to 2.6, candidates for future maintenance > snapshots are: > > * mh/get-remote-group-fix # 4 (2 weeks ago) > * cb/open-noatime-clear-errno # 1 (9 days ago) > * jk/long-error-messages # 2 (9 days ago) > * jh/strbuf-read-use-read-in-full # 1 (9 days ago) > * ps/t1509-chroot-test-fixup # 2 (2 weeks ago) > * sg/help-group # 1 (8 days ago) > * nd/dwim-wildcards-as-pathspecs # 1 (9 days ago) > * jk/fix-alias-pager-config-key-warnings # 1 (3 days ago) > * jk/rev-list-has-no-notes # 1 (3 days ago) > * nd/fixup-linked-gitdir # 1 (2 days ago) > * as/docfix-reflog-expire-unreachable # 1 (8 days ago) > * sg/t3020-typofix # 1 (8 days ago) > * po/po-readme # 1 (8 days ago) > * sg/wt-status-header-inclusion # 1 (8 days ago) > * ss/fix-config-fd-leak # 1 (8 days ago) > * jc/calloc-pathspec # 1 (8 days ago) > * rs/archive-zip-many # 3 (2 days ago) > * dt/commit-preserve-base-index-upon-opportunistic-cache-tree-update # > 1 (2 days ago) > * cc/trailers-corner-case-fix # 3 (22 hours ago) > * jk/log-missing-default-HEAD # 1 (22 hours ago) > * ee/clean-test-fixes # 1 (22 hours ago) > > These I deem are safe (not just the changes themselves are trivially > correct but it is unlikely to make things gravely worse if it turns > out there were ramifications no reviewers thought about with them) > and can go in 2.5.2. > > As to other topics that are in 'master' but not in the above list, I > do not have doubt about their value (otherwise they would not be in > 'master' in the first place), but either they are still too young in > 'master' or are with sufficiently big impact on the callchain that > it is not entirely implausible that they have risks of unforeseen > ramifications and fallouts. > > Let's aim to tag 2.5.2 soonish, before mid next-week at the latest. Okay! Thank you, Dscho ```