patch, 4 partsbisect: simplify the add of new bisect terms

>>> + name_bad = "bad"; 
>>> + name_good = "good"; 
>>> + } else { 
>>> + strbuf_getline(&str, fp, '\n'); 
>>> + name_bad = strbuf_detach(&str, NULL); 
>>> + strbuf_getline(&str, fp, '\n'); 
>>> + name_good = strbuf_detach(&str, NULL); 
>>> + } 
>> 
>> I would have kept just 
>> 
>> name_bad = "bad"; 
>> name_good = "good"; 
>> 
>> in this patch, and introduce BISECT_TERMS in a separate one. 
> 
>Yeah I agree that it is more logical to have first a patch that does 
>on bisect.c the same thing as patch 2 does on git-bisect.sh. 
> 
>For example the patch series could be for now: 
> 
>1) bisect: typo fix 
>2) bisect: replace hardcoded "bad|good" with variables 
>3) git-bisect: replace hardcoded "bad|good" with variables 
>4) bisect: simplify adding new terms 
>5) bisect: add old/new terms