threads / patch / 39519

patch, 4 partsstatus: give more information during rebase -i

Subject: [PATCH 3/4] status: give more information during rebase -i

## tl;dr

11 messages between Jun 3, 2015 and Jun 9, 2015. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 10people: 3as markdown or json

Guillaume Pagès· Jun 3, 2015, 22:00 UTC · lore

[PATCH 1/4] status: factor two rebase-related messages together

---
 wt-status.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Show changes to wt-status.c +11 −19
diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index 33452f1..fec6e85 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static void show_rebase_in_progress(struct wt_status *s,
 {
 	struct stat st;
 
-	if (has_unmerged(s)) {
+	if (has_unmerged(s) || state->rebase_in_progress || !stat(git_path("MERGE_MSG"), &st)) {
 		if (state->branch)
 			status_printf_ln(s, color,
 					 _("You are currently rebasing branch '%s' on '%s'."),
@@ -1042,25 +1042,17 @@ static void show_rebase_in_progress(struct wt_status *s,
 			status_printf_ln(s, color,
 					 _("You are currently rebasing."));
 		if (s->hints) {
-			status_printf_ln(s, color,
-				_("  (fix conflicts and then run \"git rebase --continue\")"));
-			status_printf_ln(s, color,
-				_("  (use \"git rebase --skip\" to skip this patch)"));
-			status_printf_ln(s, color,
-				_("  (use \"git rebase --abort\" to check out the original branch)"));
+			if (has_unmerged(s)) {
+				status_printf_ln(s, color,
+					_("  (fix conflicts and then run \"git rebase --continue\")"));
+				status_printf_ln(s, color,
+					_("  (use \"git rebase --skip\" to skip this patch)"));
+				status_printf_ln(s, color,
+					_("  (use \"git rebase --abort\" to check out the original branch)"));
+			} else
+				status_printf_ln(s, color,
+					_("  (all conflicts fixed: run \"git rebase --continue\")"));
 		}
-	} else if (state->rebase_in_progress || !stat(git_path("MERGE_MSG"), &st)) {
-		if (state->branch)
-			status_printf_ln(s, color,
-					 _("You are currently rebasing branch '%s' on '%s'."),
-					 state->branch,
-					 state->onto);
-		else
-			status_printf_ln(s, color,
-					 _("You are currently rebasing."));
-		if (s->hints)
-			status_printf_ln(s, color,
-				_("  (all conflicts fixed: run \"git rebase --continue\")"));
 	} else if (split_commit_in_progress(s)) {
 		if (state->branch)
 			status_printf_ln(s, color,
-- 
2.4.2.342.g3cebd9b
Guillaume Pagès· Jun 3, 2015, 22:00 UTC · re: Guillaume Pagès · lore

[PATCH 2/4] status: differentiate interactive from non-interactive rebases

---
 t/t7512-status-help.sh | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 wt-status.c            |  5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Show changes to 2 files +18 −15

t/t7512-status-help.sh, wt-status.c

diff --git a/t/t7512-status-help.sh b/t/t7512-status-help.sh
index 68ad2d7..190656d 100755
--- a/t/t7512-status-help.sh
+++ b/t/t7512-status-help.sh
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status during rebase -i when conflicts unresolved' '
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short rebase_i_conflicts) &&
 	test_must_fail git rebase -i rebase_i_conflicts &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently rebasing branch '\''rebase_i_conflicts_second'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (fix conflicts and then run "git rebase --continue")
   (use "git rebase --skip" to skip this patch)
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status during rebase -i after resolving conflicts' '
 	test_must_fail git rebase -i rebase_i_conflicts &&
 	git add main.txt &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently rebasing branch '\''rebase_i_conflicts_second'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (all conflicts fixed: run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status when rebasing -i in edit mode' '
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~2) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~2 &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''rebase_i_edit'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status when splitting a commit' '
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently splitting a commit while rebasing branch '\''split_commit'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (Once your working directory is clean, run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status after editing the last commit with --amend during a
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git commit --amend -m "foo" &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''amend_last'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (continue first edit) second edit' '
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (continue first edit) second edit and split' '
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently splitting a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (Once your working directory is clean, run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (continue first edit) second edit and amend' '
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	git commit --amend -m "foo" &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (amend first edit) second edit' '
 	git commit --amend -m "a" &&
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (amend first edit) second edit and split' '
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently splitting a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (Once your working directory is clean, run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (amend first edit) second edit and amend' '
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	git commit --amend -m "d" &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (split first edit) second edit' '
 	git commit -m "e" &&
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (split first edit) second edit and split' '
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently splitting a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (Once your working directory is clean, run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (split first edit) second edit and amend' '
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	git commit --amend -m "h" &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
-rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index fec6e85..c83eca5 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -1319,7 +1319,10 @@ void wt_status_print(struct wt_status *s)
 		else if (!strcmp(branch_name, "HEAD")) {
 			branch_status_color = color(WT_STATUS_NOBRANCH, s);
 			if (state.rebase_in_progress || state.rebase_interactive_in_progress) {
-				on_what = _("rebase in progress; onto ");
+				if (state.rebase_interactive_in_progress)
+					on_what = _("interactive rebase in progress; onto ");
+				else
+					on_what = _("rebase in progress; onto ");
 				branch_name = state.onto;
 			} else if (state.detached_from) {
 				branch_name = state.detached_from;
-- 
2.4.2.342.g3cebd9b
Guillaume Pagès· Jun 3, 2015, 22:00 UTC · re: Guillaume Pagès · lore
git status gives more information during rebase -i, about the list of
command that are done during the rebase. It displays the two last
commands executed and the two next lines to be executed. It also gives
hints to find the whole files in .git directory.
---
 t/t7512-status-help.sh | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 wt-status.c            |  90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 201 insertions(+)
Show changes to 2 files +201 −0

t/t7512-status-help.sh, wt-status.c

diff --git a/t/t7512-status-help.sh b/t/t7512-status-help.sh
index 190656d..4dd201a 100755
--- a/t/t7512-status-help.sh
+++ b/t/t7512-status-help.sh
@@ -134,9 +134,13 @@ test_expect_success 'prepare for rebase_i_conflicts' '
 test_expect_success 'status during rebase -i when conflicts unresolved' '
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short rebase_i_conflicts) &&
+	LAST_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse rebase_i_conflicts_second) &&
 	test_must_fail git rebase -i rebase_i_conflicts &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (1 command(s) done):
+   pick $LAST_COMMIT one_second
+No command remaining.
 You are currently rebasing branch '\''rebase_i_conflicts_second'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (fix conflicts and then run "git rebase --continue")
   (use "git rebase --skip" to skip this patch)
@@ -159,10 +163,14 @@ test_expect_success 'status during rebase -i after resolving conflicts' '
 	git reset --hard rebase_i_conflicts_second &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short rebase_i_conflicts) &&
+	LAST_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse rebase_i_conflicts_second) &&
 	test_must_fail git rebase -i rebase_i_conflicts &&
 	git add main.txt &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (1 command(s) done):
+   pick $LAST_COMMIT one_second
+No command remaining.
 You are currently rebasing branch '\''rebase_i_conflicts_second'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (all conflicts fixed: run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -183,7 +191,9 @@ test_expect_success 'status when rebasing -i in edit mode' '
 	git checkout -b rebase_i_edit &&
 	test_commit one_rebase_i main.txt one &&
 	test_commit two_rebase_i main.txt two &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse rebase_i_edit) &&
 	test_commit three_rebase_i main.txt three &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse rebase_i_edit) &&
 	FAKE_LINES="1 edit 2" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
@@ -191,6 +201,10 @@ test_expect_success 'status when rebasing -i in edit mode' '
 	git rebase -i HEAD~2 &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   pick $COMMIT2 two_rebase_i
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_rebase_i
+No command remaining.
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''rebase_i_edit'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -207,8 +221,11 @@ test_expect_success 'status when splitting a commit' '
 	git checkout -b split_commit &&
 	test_commit one_split main.txt one &&
 	test_commit two_split main.txt two &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse split_commit) &&
 	test_commit three_split main.txt three &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse split_commit) &&
 	test_commit four_split main.txt four &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse split_commit) &&
 	FAKE_LINES="1 edit 2 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
@@ -217,6 +234,12 @@ test_expect_success 'status when splitting a commit' '
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   pick $COMMIT2 two_split
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_split
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_split
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently splitting a commit while rebasing branch '\''split_commit'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (Once your working directory is clean, run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -239,7 +262,9 @@ test_expect_success 'status after editing the last commit with --amend during a
 	test_commit one_amend main.txt one &&
 	test_commit two_amend main.txt two &&
 	test_commit three_amend main.txt three &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse amend_last) &&
 	test_commit four_amend main.txt four &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse amend_last) &&
 	FAKE_LINES="1 2 edit 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
@@ -248,6 +273,11 @@ test_expect_success 'status after editing the last commit with --amend during a
 	git commit --amend -m "foo" &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (3 command(s) done):
+   pick $COMMIT3 three_amend
+   edit $COMMIT4 four_amend
+  (see more at .git/rebase-merge/done)
+No command remaining.
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''amend_last'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -273,11 +303,20 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (continue first edit) second edit' '
 	FAKE_LINES="edit 1 edit 2 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse several_edits^^) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse several_edits^) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse several_edits) &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   edit $COMMIT2 two_edits
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_edits
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_edits
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -294,12 +333,21 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (continue first edit) second edit and split' '
 	FAKE_LINES="edit 1 edit 2 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse several_edits^^) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse several_edits^) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse several_edits) &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   edit $COMMIT2 two_edits
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_edits
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_edits
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently splitting a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (Once your working directory is clean, run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -321,12 +369,21 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (continue first edit) second edit and amend' '
 	FAKE_LINES="edit 1 edit 2 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse several_edits^^) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse several_edits^) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse several_edits) &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	git commit --amend -m "foo" &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   edit $COMMIT2 two_edits
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_edits
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_edits
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -343,12 +400,21 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (amend first edit) second edit' '
 	FAKE_LINES="edit 1 edit 2 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse several_edits^^) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse several_edits^) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse several_edits) &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git commit --amend -m "a" &&
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   edit $COMMIT2 two_edits
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_edits
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_edits
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -366,12 +432,21 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (amend first edit) second edit and split' '
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse several_edits^^) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse several_edits^) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse several_edits) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git commit --amend -m "b" &&
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   edit $COMMIT2 two_edits
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_edits
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_edits
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently splitting a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (Once your working directory is clean, run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -393,6 +468,9 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (amend first edit) second edit and amend' '
 	FAKE_LINES="edit 1 edit 2 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse several_edits^^) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse several_edits^) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse several_edits) &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git commit --amend -m "c" &&
@@ -400,6 +478,12 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (amend first edit) second edit and amend' '
 	git commit --amend -m "d" &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   edit $COMMIT2 two_edits
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_edits
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_edits
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -416,6 +500,9 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (split first edit) second edit' '
 	FAKE_LINES="edit 1 edit 2 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse several_edits^^) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse several_edits^) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse several_edits) &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
@@ -424,6 +511,12 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (split first edit) second edit' '
 	git rebase --continue &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   edit $COMMIT2 two_edits
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_edits
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_edits
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
@@ -440,6 +533,9 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (split first edit) second edit and split' '
 	FAKE_LINES="edit 1 edit 2 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse several_edits^^) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse several_edits^) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse several_edits) &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
@@ -449,6 +545,12 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (split first edit) second edit and split' '
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   edit $COMMIT2 two_edits
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_edits
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_edits
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently splitting a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (Once your working directory is clean, run "git rebase --continue")
 
@@ -470,6 +572,9 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (split first edit) second edit and amend' '
 	FAKE_LINES="edit 1 edit 2 3" &&
 	export FAKE_LINES &&
 	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse several_edits^^) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse several_edits^) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse several_edits) &&
 	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
 	git rebase -i HEAD~3 &&
 	git reset HEAD^ &&
@@ -479,6 +584,12 @@ test_expect_success 'status: (split first edit) second edit and amend' '
 	git commit --amend -m "h" &&
 	cat >expected <<EOF &&
 interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   edit $COMMIT2 two_edits
+   edit $COMMIT3 three_edits
+Next command(s) to do (1 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_edits
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
 You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_edits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
   (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
   (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index c83eca5..35ca55e 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -1026,12 +1026,102 @@ static int split_commit_in_progress(struct wt_status *s)
 	return split_in_progress;
 }
 
+void get_two_last_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines)
+{
+	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
+	FILE *fp;
+
+	*numlines = 0;
+	fp = fopen(git_path("%s", filename), "r");
+	if (!fp) {
+		strbuf_release(&buf);
+		return;
+	}
+	while (strbuf_getline(&buf, fp, '\n') != EOF) {
+		(*numlines)++;
+		lines[0] = lines[1];
+		lines[1] = strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
+	}
+	fclose(fp);
+}
+
+void get_two_first_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines)
+{
+	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;;
+	char *line;
+	FILE *fp;
+
+
+	*numlines = 0;
+	fp = fopen(git_path("%s", filename), "r");
+	if (!fp) {
+		strbuf_release(&buf);
+		return;
+	}
+	while (strbuf_getline(&buf, fp, '\n') != EOF) {
+		stripspace(&buf, 1);
+		line = strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
+		if (strcmp(line, "") == 0)
+			continue;
+		if (*numlines < 2)
+			lines[*numlines] = line;
+		(*numlines)++;
+	}
+	fclose(fp);
+}
+
+static void show_rebase_information(struct wt_status *s,
+				    struct wt_status_state *state,
+				    const char *color)
+{
+	if (state->rebase_interactive_in_progress) {
+		int i, begin;
+		int numlines = 0;
+		char *lines[2];
+		get_two_last_lines("rebase-merge/done", &numlines, lines);
+		if (numlines == 0)
+			status_printf_ln(s,color,_("No command done."));
+		else{
+			status_printf_ln(s,color,
+				_("Last command(s) done (%d command(s) done):"),
+				numlines);
+			begin = numlines > 1? 0 : 1;
+			for (i = begin; i < 2; i++) {
+				status_printf_ln(s,color,"   %s",lines[i]);
+			}
+			if (numlines > 2 && s->hints)
+			   status_printf_ln(s,color,
+				_("  (see more at .git/rebase-merge/done)"));
+		}
+		numlines = 0;
+		get_two_first_lines("rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo",
+					 &numlines, lines);
+		if (numlines == 0)
+			status_printf_ln(s, color,
+					 _("No command remaining."));
+		else{
+
+			status_printf_ln(s, color,
+				_("Next command(s) to do (%d remaining command(s)):"),
+				numlines);
+			begin = numlines > 1? 0 : 1;
+			for (i = 0; (i < 2 && i < numlines); i++) {
+				status_printf(s, color, "   %s", lines[i]);
+			}
+			if (s->hints)
+			   status_printf_ln(s, color,
+				_("  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)"));
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static void show_rebase_in_progress(struct wt_status *s,
 				struct wt_status_state *state,
 				const char *color)
 {
 	struct stat st;
 
+	show_rebase_information(s, state, color);
 	if (has_unmerged(s) || state->rebase_in_progress || !stat(git_path("MERGE_MSG"), &st)) {
 		if (state->branch)
 			status_printf_ln(s, color,
-- 
2.4.2.342.g3cebd9b
Matthieu Moy· Jun 4, 2015, 08:06 UTC · re: Guillaume Pagès · lore

Re: [PATCH 3/4] status: give more information during rebase -i

Guillaume Pagès <guillaume.pages@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> +  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
You're still missing double-quotes around "git rebase --edit-todo".
Guillaume Pagès <guillaume.pages@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> +Last command(s) done (1 command(s) done):

Can't we just have "1 command"/"2 commands" instead of this (s). It's particularly bad since it is already within parenthesis.

See the doc for Q_() in po/README and http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/gettext/manual/html_node/Plural-forms.html for more details.

Show 55 quoted lines
> +void get_two_last_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines)
> +{
> +	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +	FILE *fp;
> +
> +	*numlines = 0;
> +	fp = fopen(git_path("%s", filename), "r");
> +	if (!fp) {
> +		strbuf_release(&buf);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	while (strbuf_getline(&buf, fp, '\n') != EOF) {
> +		(*numlines)++;
> +		lines[0] = lines[1];
> +		lines[1] = strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
> +	}
> +	fclose(fp);
> +}
> +
> +void get_two_first_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines)
> +{
> +	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;;
> +	char *line;
> +	FILE *fp;
> +
> +
> +	*numlines = 0;
> +	fp = fopen(git_path("%s", filename), "r");
> +	if (!fp) {
> +		strbuf_release(&buf);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	while (strbuf_getline(&buf, fp, '\n') != EOF) {
> +		stripspace(&buf, 1);
> +		line = strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
> +		if (strcmp(line, "") == 0)
> +			continue;
> +		if (*numlines < 2)
> +			lines[*numlines] = line;
> +		(*numlines)++;
> +	}
> +	fclose(fp);
> +}
> +
> +static void show_rebase_information(struct wt_status *s,
> +				    struct wt_status_state *state,
> +				    const char *color)
> +{
> +	if (state->rebase_interactive_in_progress) {
> +		int i, begin;
> +		int numlines = 0;
> +		char *lines[2];
> +		get_two_last_lines("rebase-merge/done", &numlines, lines);
> +		if (numlines == 0)
> +			status_printf_ln(s,color,_("No command done."));
space after comma.

You may want to play with clang-format/clang-format-diff to have a tool tell you this instead of asking a human.

I think english people would make this plural (No commands done).
> +		else{
> +			status_printf_ln(s,color,
> +				_("Last command(s) done (%d command(s) done):"),
> +				numlines);
Q_() ?
Show 7 quoted lines
> +			begin = numlines > 1? 0 : 1;
> +			for (i = begin; i < 2; i++) {
> +				status_printf_ln(s,color,"   %s",lines[i]);
> +			}
> +			if (numlines > 2 && s->hints)
> +			   status_printf_ln(s,color,
> +				_("  (see more at .git/rebase-merge/done)"));
I'd write explicitly 'in file ...' instead of 'at'.
You need to use git_path here, it may not be ".git" in some contexts.
-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
Junio C Hamano· Jun 4, 2015, 17:19 UTC · re: Matthieu Moy · lore

Re: [PATCH 3/4] status: give more information during rebase -i

Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> +void get_two_last_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines)
>> +{
>> +...
>> +}
>> +
>> +void get_two_first_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines)
>> +{
>> +...
>> +}
I had a handful of comments on these:
 - Do we need two separate and overly specific functions like these,
   i.e. "two" and "first/last"?
 - Wouldn't people want to be able to configure the number of lines?
 - Do we really want get_two_{first,last}_LINES() functions?
   I am wondering if insn sheets these functions read include
   comments, in which case get_n_{first,last}_commands() may be a
   more correct name.
 - Wouldn't it be necessary for these functions to report the total
   number of commands, instead of giving "void" back?  Otherwise how
   would the caller produce summary like this:
       An interactive rebase of 14 commits in progress.  You have
       replayed 4 commits so far, the last few of which were:
          da66b27 remote.c: provide per-branch pushremote name
          f052154 remote.c: hoist branch.*.remote lookup out of
       and 10 more commits to go, the next few of which are:
          a9f9f8c remote.c: introduce branch_get_upstream helper
          8770e6f remote.c: hoist read_config into remote_get_1
       
   Note that I am not suggesting the phrasing or presentation.  The
   information content is what I am interested in.
Guillaume Pages· Jun 5, 2015, 16:35 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: [PATCH 3/4] status: give more information during rebase -i

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes
>Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: 
Show 9 quoted lines
>>> +void get_two_last_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines) 
>>> +{ 
>>> +... 
>>> +} 
>>> + 
>>> +void get_two_first_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines) 
>>> +{ 
>>> +... 
>>> +} 
>I had a handful of comments on these: 
>- Do we need two separate and overly specific functions like these, 
>i.e. "two" and "first/last"? 
>- Wouldn't people want to be able to configure the number of lines? 
>- Do we really want get_two_{first,last}_LINES() functions? 
>I am wondering if insn sheets these functions read include 
>comments, in which case get_n_{first,last}_commands() may be a 
>more correct name. 
>- Wouldn't it be necessary for these functions to report the total 
>number of commands, instead of giving "void" back? Otherwise how 
>would the caller produce summary like this: 

I felt that was not the right way to do so. What do you think of a function like that:

/*
 * Puts nb_commands commands from filename in lines,
 * returns the total number of commands in the file
 * ignores comments and empty lines
 * lines needs to be at least of size nb_commands
 * part: 0 get last commands
 * 	 1 get first commands
 */
int get_commands(char *filename, int nb_commands, char **lines, int part)

Maybe part is not the best word to choose to take the beginning or the end of the file. I also hesitate about adding a parameter to ignore or not the comments.

Junio C Hamano· Jun 5, 2015, 17:11 UTC · re: Guillaume Pages · lore

Re: [PATCH 3/4] status: give more information during rebase -i

Guillaume Pages <guillaume.pages@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> I felt that was not the right way to do so. What do you think of a
> function like that:
>
> /*
>  * Puts nb_commands commands from filename in lines,
>  * returns the total number of commands in the file
>  * ignores comments and empty lines
>  * lines needs to be at least of size nb_commands
>  * part: 0 get last commands
>  * 	 1 get first commands
>  */
>
> int get_commands(char *filename, int nb_commands, char **lines, int part)
>
> Maybe part is not the best word to choose to take the beginning or the end
> of the file. I also hesitate about adding a parameter to ignore or not the 
> comments.

If I were doing the caller of these two functions, then instead of adding these specialized helpers, I'd probably structure that caller this way:

	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
	struct string_list have_done = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
	struct string_list yet_to_do = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
	int have_done_nr, yet_to_do_nr;
	strbuf_read_file(&buf, ".../done", 0);
	stripspace(&buf, 1);
        have_done_nr = string_list_split(&have_done, buf.buf, '\n', -1);
	strbuf_release(&buf);
	strbuf_read_file(&buf, ".../todo", 0);
	stripspace(&buf, 1);
        yet_to_do_nr = string_list_split(&yet_to_do, buf.buf, '\n', -1);
	strbuf_release(&buf);

Then have_done.items[have_done_nr - 1].string would be the last one that we have replayed, and yet_to_do.items[0].string would be the next one we are going to replay.

Guillaume Pagès· Jun 3, 2015, 22:00 UTC · re: Guillaume Pagès · lore

[PATCH 4/4] status: add new tests for status during rebase -i

---
 t/t7512-status-help.sh | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
Show changes to t/t7512-status-help.sh +88 −0
diff --git a/t/t7512-status-help.sh b/t/t7512-status-help.sh
index 4dd201a..dff912b 100755
--- a/t/t7512-status-help.sh
+++ b/t/t7512-status-help.sh
@@ -856,4 +856,92 @@ EOF
 	test_i18ncmp expected actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'prepare for different number of commits rebased' '
+	git reset --hard master &&
+	git checkout -b several_commits &&
+	test_commit one_commit main.txt one &&
+	test_commit two_commit main.txt two &&
+	test_commit three_commit main.txt three &&
+	test_commit four_commit main.txt four
+'
+
+
+test_expect_success 'status: one command done nothing remaining' '
+	FAKE_LINES=" exec_exit_15" &&
+	export FAKE_LINES &&
+	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
+	(git rebase -i HEAD~3 || true)&&
+       cat >expected <<EOF &&
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (1 command(s) done):
+   exec exit 15
+No command remaining.
+You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_commits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
+  (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
+  (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
+
+nothing to commit (use -u to show untracked files)
+EOF
+	git status --untracked-files=no >actual &&
+	test_i18ncmp expected actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'status: two commands done, two remainings' '
+	FAKE_LINES="1 exec_exit_15 2 3" &&
+	export FAKE_LINES &&
+	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse HEAD^) &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse HEAD^^) &&
+	(git rebase -i HEAD~3 || true)&&
+       cat >expected <<EOF &&
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (2 command(s) done):
+   pick $COMMIT2 two_commit
+   exec exit 15
+Next command(s) to do (2 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT3 three_commit
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_commit
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
+You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_commits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
+  (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
+  (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
+
+nothing to commit (use -u to show untracked files)
+EOF
+	git status --untracked-files=no >actual &&
+	test_i18ncmp expected actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'status: more than two commands done, two remainings' '
+	FAKE_LINES="1 2 exec_exit_15 3 4" &&
+	export FAKE_LINES &&
+	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
+	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~4) &&
+	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
+	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse HEAD^) &&
+	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse HEAD^^) &&
+	(git rebase -i HEAD~4 || true)&&
+	cat >expected <<EOF &&
+interactive rebase in progress; onto $ONTO
+Last command(s) done (3 command(s) done):
+   pick $COMMIT2 two_commit
+   exec exit 15
+  (see more at .git/rebase-merge/done)
+Next command(s) to do (2 remaining command(s)):
+   pick $COMMIT3 three_commit
+   pick $COMMIT4 four_commit
+  (use git rebase --edit-todo to view and edit)
+You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch '\''several_commits'\'' on '\''$ONTO'\''.
+  (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
+  (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
+
+nothing to commit (use -u to show untracked files)
+EOF
+	git status --untracked-files=no >actual &&
+	test_i18ncmp expected actual
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
2.4.2.342.g3cebd9b
Matthieu Moy· Jun 4, 2015, 08:11 UTC · re: Guillaume Pagès · lore

Re: [PATCH 4/4] status: add new tests for status during rebase -i

I'd swap 3/4 and 4/4 so that we see the impact of your code on these new tests. I won't insist on that though.

Please help reviewers by explaining in the commit message why these tests are needed (what was not covered properly by existing tests?)

Guillaume Pagès <guillaume.pages@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> +test_expect_success 'status: two commands done, two remainings' '
> +	FAKE_LINES="1 exec_exit_15 2 3" &&
> +	export FAKE_LINES &&
> +	test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" &&
> +	ONTO=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD~3) &&
> +	COMMIT4=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
> +	COMMIT3=$(git rev-parse HEAD^) &&
> +	COMMIT2=$(git rev-parse HEAD^^) &&
> +	(git rebase -i HEAD~3 || true)&&
Space before &&
(same on second test)
> +       cat >expected <<EOF &&
Indent with spaces.

I did not do a thourough review, but this version looks much, much nicer than the previous one (see how PATCH 1/4 and PATCH 2/4 are nice now?).

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
Junio C Hamano· Jun 8, 2015, 22:00 UTC · re: Guillaume Pagès · lore

Re: [PATCH 1/4] status: factor two rebase-related messages together

Guillaume Pagès  <guillaume.pages@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> ---
>  wt-status.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Hmmm, it obviously does not break anything but it is not obvious why this is a good change.

Is it that you wanted to have a single instance of "if on a branch, we say 'you are rebasing that branch', otherwise we say 'you are rebasing'"? Even then, I am not sure if this code movement was the best way to do so (an obvious alternative is to use a shared helper function and call from the two arms of if/elseif/... chain).

Show 50 quoted lines
>
> diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
> index 33452f1..fec6e85 100644
> --- a/wt-status.c
> +++ b/wt-status.c
> @@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static void show_rebase_in_progress(struct wt_status *s,
>  {
>  	struct stat st;
>  
> -	if (has_unmerged(s)) {
> +	if (has_unmerged(s) || state->rebase_in_progress || !stat(git_path("MERGE_MSG"), &st)) {
>  		if (state->branch)
>  			status_printf_ln(s, color,
>  					 _("You are currently rebasing branch '%s' on '%s'."),
> @@ -1042,25 +1042,17 @@ static void show_rebase_in_progress(struct wt_status *s,
>  			status_printf_ln(s, color,
>  					 _("You are currently rebasing."));
>  		if (s->hints) {
> -			status_printf_ln(s, color,
> -				_("  (fix conflicts and then run \"git rebase --continue\")"));
> -			status_printf_ln(s, color,
> -				_("  (use \"git rebase --skip\" to skip this patch)"));
> -			status_printf_ln(s, color,
> -				_("  (use \"git rebase --abort\" to check out the original branch)"));
> +			if (has_unmerged(s)) {
> +				status_printf_ln(s, color,
> +					_("  (fix conflicts and then run \"git rebase --continue\")"));
> +				status_printf_ln(s, color,
> +					_("  (use \"git rebase --skip\" to skip this patch)"));
> +				status_printf_ln(s, color,
> +					_("  (use \"git rebase --abort\" to check out the original branch)"));
> +			} else
> +				status_printf_ln(s, color,
> +					_("  (all conflicts fixed: run \"git rebase --continue\")"));
>  		}
> -	} else if (state->rebase_in_progress || !stat(git_path("MERGE_MSG"), &st)) {
> -		if (state->branch)
> -			status_printf_ln(s, color,
> -					 _("You are currently rebasing branch '%s' on '%s'."),
> -					 state->branch,
> -					 state->onto);
> -		else
> -			status_printf_ln(s, color,
> -					 _("You are currently rebasing."));
> -		if (s->hints)
> -			status_printf_ln(s, color,
> -				_("  (all conflicts fixed: run \"git rebase --continue\")"));
>  	} else if (split_commit_in_progress(s)) {
>  		if (state->branch)
>  			status_printf_ln(s, color,
Guillaume Pages· Jun 9, 2015, 07:33 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: [PATCH 1/4] status: factor two rebase-related messages together

"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>Hmmm, it obviously does not break anything but it is not obvious why 
>this is a good change. 
Show 5 quoted lines
>Is it that you wanted to have a single instance of "if on a branch, 
>we say 'you are rebasing that branch', otherwise we say 'you are 
>rebasing'"? Even then, I am not sure if this code movement was the 
>best way to do so (an obvious alternative is to use a shared helper 
>function and call from the two arms of if/elseif/... chain). 

I made this change because at first sight, this piece of code was difficult to read for me. There was two long branches very similar and I had to spot the differences, and the actual differences were at the very end of the branches so I had to check back what the condition was about. It seems now much more natural to me: the part in common of both branches is in OR-condition and the differences between branches are gathered with the test on the variable they depend.

By the way, I agree that this change is not absolutely necessary.

← back to recent threads