Re: [PATCH] git-p4: Fetch the proper revision of utf16 files
[Daniel: Your HTML-formatted response probably did not make it to the Git mailing list since only plain text is accepted. Also, please respond inline on this list rather than top-posting.]
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Domain Admin <daniel@dbingham.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> I think the context of the patch doesn't make this clear, but if you look at
> git-p4.py in this spot you'll see that this is in a block that begins:
>
> if type_base == "utf16":
>
> Where "type_base" is extracted, by the script, from the filetype provided by
> p4 (i.e. metadata provided by p4). In the particular scenario I encountered,
> P4 said that the file was of type xutf16 from which the split_p4_type()
> method extracts "utf16" as the type_base.
So, the patch's mention of "UTF16 file" indeed refers to the content rather than the filename.
Now that I've studied up on Perforce a bit and read through some of the git-p4.py code, I understand that there is a special-case for files with utf-16 content in which git-p4 re-reads the content in order to work around a problem with ASCII text saved with type utf-16 getting mangled. The work-around, 55aa5714 (git-p4: handle utf16 filetype properly; 2011-10-17), is buggy in that it neglects to specify a particular revision of the file, and your patch fixes that. Perhaps your commit message could make that a bit clearer by mentioning the special-case and citing 55aa5714? Maybe something like:
The special-case handling of files with UTF-16 content done by
55aa5714 (git-p4: handle utf16 filetype properly; 2011-10-17)
neglects to specify a revision when re-reading the file content.
As a result, the latest revision of the UTF-16 file is always
fetched rather than the desired one.Also, is it possible to craft a test for this issue and place it in one of the t98xx scripts?
Show 55 quoted lines
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Bingham <daniel@dbingham.com>
>> wrote:
>> > git-p4 always fetches the latest revision of UTF16
>> > files from P4 rather than the revision at the commit being sync'd.
>> >
>> > The print command should, instead, specify the revision number from the
>> > commit in question using the file#revision syntax.
>> >
>> > The file#revision syntax is preferable over file@changelist for
>> > consistency with how streamP4Files formats the fileArgs list.
>>
>> As a non-Perforce reader trying to understand this patch, there are a
>> couple issues which are unclear or inadequately explained. Perhaps you
>> could provide a bit more detail or cite relevant sources.
>>
>> First, does "UTF16 file" refer to the content or the filename?
>>
>> Second, I may be entirely missing it, but the commit message doesn't
>> seem to explain why this impacts only "UTF16 files", and why this
>> solution is the appropriate fix.
>>
>> If the answer to the first question is that the filename is UTF-16,
>> then would an alternate fix be to convert the value of
>> file['depotFile'] to have the same encoding as the "print -q -o - ..."
>> command-line? (Again, please excuse my Perforce-ignorance if I'm
>> completely off the mark.)
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Bingham <git@dbingham.com>
>> > ---
>> > git-p4.py | 3 ++-
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/git-p4.py b/git-p4.py
>> > index ff132b2..156f3a4 100755
>> > --- a/git-p4.py
>> > +++ b/git-p4.py
>> > @@ -2101,7 +2101,8 @@ class P4Sync(Command, P4UserMap):
>> > # them back too. This is not needed to the cygwin windows
>> > version,
>> > # just the native "NT" type.
>> > #
>> > - text = p4_read_pipe(['print', '-q', '-o', '-',
>> > file['depotFile']])
>> > + ufile = "%s#%s" % (file['depotFile'], file['rev'])
>> > + text = p4_read_pipe(['print', '-q', '-o', '-', ufile])
>> > if p4_version_string().find("/NT") >= 0:
>> > text = text.replace("\r\n", "\n")
>> > contents = [ text ]
>> > --
>> > 2.3.5