threads / bug / 38501

[BUG] Move tracking in git diff is not as good as in git status

Subject: [BUG] Move tracking in git diff is not as good as in git status

## tl;dr

3 messages between Feb 5, 2015 and Feb 5, 2015.

replies: 2people: 3as markdown or json

Scott Schmit· Feb 5, 2015, 06:11 UTC · lore

In my use of git, I've noticed that "git status" is a lot better at tracking moves and renames than "git diff", and this has recently caused me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a single commit, and it was very difficult to figure out which moves were right and which were wrong.

I was using a fairly old version of git (1.7.11), but was able to reproduce it on git 2.2.1.

Here's a reproduction recipe:
#!/bin/sh -x

# Fill in your git.git working tree path here: GIT_GIT_REPO=

if [ -z "$GIT_GIT_REPO" ]; then
    echo Fill in GIT_GIT_REPO
    exit 1
fi

git init mv-test cd mv-test/

# Pick two sample files of non-trivial size, since files that are too small # never get tracked as moves. cp ${GIT_GIT_REPO}/Documentation/asciidoc.conf . cp ${GIT_GIT_REPO}/Documentation/blame-options.txt . git add * git commit -m "Start with two files from git.git/Documentation"

# Now rename them to something. Using 1 & 2 because they're nice & short. git mv asciidoc.conf 1 git mv blame-options.txt 2

# Status sees the rename git status

# So does the summary on the commit git commit -m "Rename both files"

# And move tracking works git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD~.. git diff -C --stat --summary HEAD~..

# Now "shift" the files git mv 2 3 git mv 1 2

# Status knows what's going on git status

# So does commit git commit -m "2=1;3=2;"

# Neither of these commands get it (but -C gets a glimmer of the truth) git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD~.. git diff -C --stat --summary HEAD~..

# Swap the files in place git mv 3 tmp git mv 2 3 git mv tmp 2

# Status gets it git status

# Commit understands git commit -m "Swap 2 & 3"

# Diff has no idea git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD~.. git diff -C --stat --summary HEAD~..

---

At first, I thought it was because the "git mv" command recorded something in the index that's lost once the commit happens.

To check if that was so, I went back to the commit in question, did a "git reset HEAD~1" and "git add -A ." and git status understood what was going on just fine.

-- 
Scott Schmit
Kyle J. McKay· Feb 5, 2015, 07:39 UTC · re: Scott Schmit · lore

Re: [BUG] Move tracking in git diff is not as good as in git status

On Feb 4, 2015, at 22:11, Scott Schmit wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> In my use of git, I've noticed that "git status" is a lot better at
> tracking moves and renames than "git diff", and this has recently  
> caused
> me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a
> single commit, and it was very difficult to figure out which moves  
> were
> right and which were wrong.
>
> I was using a fairly old version of git (1.7.11), but was able to
> reproduce it on git 2.2.1.
>
> Here's a reproduction recipe:
[...]
> # Now "shift" the files
> git mv 2 3
> git mv 1 2
[...]
Show 6 quoted lines
> git commit -m "2=1;3=2;"
>
> # Neither of these commands get it (but -C gets a glimmer of the  
> truth)
> git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD~..
> git diff -C --stat --summary HEAD~..
Ah, but did you try this:
   git diff -B -M --stat --summary HEAD~..
> # Swap the files in place
> git mv 3 tmp
> git mv 2 3
> git mv tmp 2
[...]
Show 5 quoted lines
> git commit -m "Swap 2 & 3"
>
> # Diff has no idea
> git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD~..
> git diff -C --stat --summary HEAD~..
Again, try this:
   git diff -B -M --stat --summary HEAD~..
You can even use this:
   git log -B -M --summary
to see them all.

While you can configure -M (or -C) to be on by default (see git config diff.renames), there does not appear to be a config option to turn on - B (--break-rewrites) by default.

And according to a recent thread [1], using -B and -M together can produce incorrect results so you might not want them both on by default anyway.

-Kyle
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1879635
Junio C Hamano· Feb 5, 2015, 19:01 UTC · re: Kyle J. McKay · lore

Re: [BUG] Move tracking in git diff is not as good as in git status

"Kyle J. McKay" <mackyle@gmail.com> writes:
Show 29 quoted lines
> On Feb 4, 2015, at 22:11, Scott Schmit wrote:
>
>> In my use of git, I've noticed that "git status" is a lot better at
>> tracking moves and renames than "git diff", and this has recently
>> caused
>> me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a
>> single commit, and it was very difficult to figure out which moves
>> were
>> right and which were wrong.
>>
>> I was using a fairly old version of git (1.7.11), but was able to
>> reproduce it on git 2.2.1.
>>
>> Here's a reproduction recipe:
> [...]
>> # Now "shift" the files
>> git mv 2 3
>> git mv 1 2
> [...]
>> git commit -m "2=1;3=2;"
>>
>> # Neither of these commands get it (but -C gets a glimmer of the
>> truth)
>> git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD~..
>> git diff -C --stat --summary HEAD~..
>
> Ah, but did you try this:
>
>   git diff -B -M --stat --summary HEAD~..

Yes, since f714fb84 (Enable rewrite as well as rename detection in git-status, 2007-12-02) "git status" internally uses "-B -M".

← back to recent threads