# [PATCH 0/3] Merge leftover bits

3 messages from 2005-04-28 to 2005-04-28. Participants: Junio C Hamano, Linus Torvalds.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/375

## Junio C Hamano, 2005-04-28 17:11

Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Merge leftover bits
Message-ID: <7voeby968l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7voeby968l.fsf%40assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net

```
This series is a resend of various fixes rediffed against your
HEAD this morning.

    [PATCH 1/3] diff-cache.c compilation warning fix.
    [PATCH 2/3] diff.c: clean temporary files
    [PATCH 3/3] diff-tree-helper: ignore unmerged path outside specification.


```

## Linus Torvalds, 2005-04-28 17:17

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Merge leftover bits
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504281016390.18901@ppc970.osdl.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/Pine.LNX.4.58.0504281016390.18901%40ppc970.osdl.org
In-Reply-To: <7voeby968l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

```


On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> This series is a resend of various fixes rediffed against your
> HEAD this morning.

I actually just applied (and pushed out) your older versions.

Can you check my current tree, especially if you made some improvements in 
the meantime?

		Linus

```

## Junio C Hamano, 2005-04-28 17:20

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Merge leftover bits
Message-ID: <7vekcu95sy.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vekcu95sy.fsf%40assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504281016390.18901@ppc970.osdl.org>

```
>>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

LT> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> 
>> This series is a resend of various fixes rediffed against your
>> HEAD this morning.

LT> I actually just applied (and pushed out) your older versions.

What I prepared and were going to send are just a rediff against
2f97813870c73a89b673ea7882f2a078d25c2dcd which did not have
these three bits, so if you have not forgotten about them then
it's fine.  I'll not re-send them.

LT> Can you check my current tree, especially if you made some
LT> improvements in the meantime?

No improvements in the meantime but I'll let you know if I see
any problems.


```
