Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] t: git-show: adapt tests to fixed 'git show'
Max Kirillov <max@max630.net> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> 'git show' used to print extra newline after merge commit, and it was
> recorded so into the test reference data. Now when the behavior is
> fixed, the tests should be updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
> ---
Hmph. Having these as two separate commits would mean that 1/2 alone will break the test, hurting bisectability a little bit. The necessary adjustments in this patch is small enough that we may be better off squashing them into one.
Show 17 quoted lines
> t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh | 2 +-
> t/t7600-merge.sh | 11 +++++------
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh b/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh
> index 2a19e79..672280b 100755
> --- a/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh
> +++ b/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge my-side@{u} records the correct name' '
> git branch -D new ;# can fail but is ok
> git branch -t new my-side@{u} &&
> git merge -s ours new@{u} &&
> - git show -s --pretty=format:%s >actual &&
> + git show -s --pretty=tformat:%s >actual &&
> echo "Merge remote-tracking branch ${sq}origin/side${sq}" >expect &&
> test_cmp expect actual
> )This seems to me that it is updating how the output is produced, not updating the expected outputs from commands with arguments we have been testing. I have been expecting to see changes to the pieces of the code that prepare the expected output, so that we can compare old expectations, which would have been expecting something strange, with new expectations from the updated code, which would show that the new behaviour is a welcome change because it would produce more sensible output.
Having said all that, for this particular test piece, I agree with the patch that using --pretty=tformat:%s is a lot more sensible and using --pretty=format:%s and expecting its output to be terminated with the newline was an unrealistic test. After all, "tformat" is the version with "line terminator" semantics, as opposed to "item separator" semantics offered by "--pretty=format:", and the test merely was depending on the bug to expect a complete line output (i.e. "echo" without "-n"), which you fixed. The new test makes a lot more sense and is relevant to the real world use, and I would have preferred to see it explained as such in the log message.
Show 17 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t7600-merge.sh b/t/t7600-merge.sh
> index 10aa028..b164621 100755
> --- a/t/t7600-merge.sh
> +++ b/t/t7600-merge.sh
> @@ -57,11 +57,10 @@ create_merge_msgs () {
> git log --no-merges ^HEAD c2 c3
> } >squash.1-5-9 &&
> : >msg.nologff &&
> - echo >msg.nolognoff &&
> + : >msg.nolognoff &&
> {
> echo "* tag 'c3':" &&
> - echo " commit 3" &&
> - echo
> + echo " commit 3"
> } >msg.log
> }These are updating the expectation. We used to expect an unnecessary trailing blank line, and now we do not, which clearly shows that the previous fix is a welcome change.
Show 9 quoted lines
> @@ -71,7 +70,7 @@ verify_merge () {
> git diff --exit-code &&
> if test -n "$3"
> then
> - git show -s --pretty=format:%s HEAD >msg.act &&
> + git show -s --pretty=tformat:%s HEAD >msg.act &&
> test_cmp "$3" msg.act
> fi
> }It is hard to judge what is fed as "$3" here without context, but this is in line with the "--pretty=tformat aka --format is the normal thing to use" we saw in 1507. The same for the other hunk.
Show 13 quoted lines
> @@ -620,10 +619,10 @@ test_expect_success 'merge early part of c2' '
> git tag c6 &&
> git branch -f c5-branch c5 &&
> git merge c5-branch~1 &&
> - git show -s --pretty=format:%s HEAD >actual.branch &&
> + git show -s --pretty=tformat:%s HEAD >actual.branch &&
> git reset --keep HEAD^ &&
> git merge c5~1 &&
> - git show -s --pretty=format:%s HEAD >actual.tag &&
> + git show -s --pretty=tformat:%s HEAD >actual.tag &&
> test_cmp expected.branch actual.branch &&
> test_cmp expected.tag actual.tag
> '
How about squashing these two into a single patch, and at the end of the log message for 1/2, add this to explain the changes to the test:
Also existing tests are updated to demonstrate the new
behaviour. Earlier, the tests that used "git show -s
--pretty=format:%s", even though "--pretty=format:%s" calls for
item separator semantics and does not ask for the terminating
newline after the last item, expected the output to end with
such a newline. They were relying on the buggy behaviour. Use
of "--format=%s", which is equivalent to "--pretty=tformat:%s"
that asks for a terminating newline after each item, is a more
realistic way to use the command. The update to verify_merge in t7600 adjusts the the merge
message that used to expect an extra blank line in the output,
which has been eliminated with this fix.or something like that?
Max Kirillov
