# any problems with new branch of gitk? 5 messages from 2006-03-05 to 2006-03-15. Participants: Paul Mackerras, A Large Angry SCM, Alex Riesen. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/3574 ## Paul Mackerras, 2006-03-05 22:09 Subject: any problems with new branch of gitk? Message-ID: <17419.24973.402408.237865@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/17419.24973.402408.237865%40cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com ``` I'm planning to pull the `new' branch of the gitk repository into the master branch, making the new version of gitk the standard version that will go into the git.git repository. As far as I know the new version does everything the old version does. Does anyone know of any problems with the new gitk that weren't in the old one? Thanks, Paul. ``` ## A Large Angry SCM, 2006-03-05 23:16 Subject: Re: any problems with new branch of gitk? Message-ID: <440B7136.2000809@gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/440B7136.2000809%40gmail.com In-Reply-To: <17419.24973.402408.237865@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> ``` Paul Mackerras wrote: > I'm planning to pull the `new' branch of the gitk repository into the > master branch, making the new version of gitk the standard version > that will go into the git.git repository. As far as I know the new > version does everything the old version does. Does anyone know of any > problems with the new gitk that weren't in the old one? I don't know if the old version has this problem but the new version does not have a "busy" pointer while it's waiting for a merge diff. Take a look at the ACPI mega(octo)pus merge that happened in January. ``` ## Alex Riesen, 2006-03-06 20:23 Subject: Re: any problems with new branch of gitk? Message-ID: <20060306202340.GA5946@steel.home> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20060306202340.GA5946%40steel.home In-Reply-To: <17419.24973.402408.237865@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> ``` Paul Mackerras, Sun, Mar 05, 2006 23:09:17 +0100: > I'm planning to pull the `new' branch of the gitk repository into the > master branch, making the new version of gitk the standard version > that will go into the git.git repository. As far as I know the new > version does everything the old version does. Does anyone know of any > problems with the new gitk that weren't in the old one? I don't if that was intended (see the screenshot attached), but some lines miss arrows. Click on where the arrow would be works (jump to counterpart arrow). Never have this with the old gitk. Tcl/Tk 8.4.9 (Gentoo). ``` ## Paul Mackerras, 2006-03-15 11:18 Subject: Re: any problems with new branch of gitk? Message-ID: <17431.63509.670409.212654@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/17431.63509.670409.212654%40cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20060306202340.GA5946@steel.home> ``` Alex Riesen writes: > I don't if that was intended (see the screenshot attached), but some > lines miss arrows. Click on where the arrow would be works (jump to > counterpart arrow). Never have this with the old gitk. > > Tcl/Tk 8.4.9 (Gentoo). Yes, it seems that tk 8.4 can't draw arrows on the ends of diagonal line segments. The old gitk coped with this by simply shortening the line until it got to a vertical line segment. I can probably do better than that with the new layout algorithm. I'll look at it. Paul. ``` ## Alex Riesen, 2006-03-15 13:00 Subject: Re: any problems with new branch of gitk? Message-ID: <81b0412b0603150500k11e69c5s95158b61fda3ca70@mail.gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/81b0412b0603150500k11e69c5s95158b61fda3ca70%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: <17431.63509.670409.212654@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> ``` On 3/15/06, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > I don't if that was intended (see the screenshot attached), but some > > lines miss arrows. Click on where the arrow would be works (jump to > > counterpart arrow). Never have this with the old gitk. > > > > Tcl/Tk 8.4.9 (Gentoo). > > Yes, it seems that tk 8.4 can't draw arrows on the ends of diagonal > line segments. The old gitk coped with this by simply shortening the > line until it got to a vertical line segment. I can probably do > better than that with the new layout algorithm. I'll look at it. > Ok, thanks for confirmation. I wasn't sure if that's me, Gentoo, or tk. On related note: do you know of any way to start gitk with sensible layout under cygwin? I ended up with commenting out sourcing of .gitk. It produces a window compressed in one block, which I can resize and relayout later. Any other attempt to preset the size or layout either can't be (literally) seen or can't be changed into something usable. ```