# Converting repo from HG, `git filter-branch --prune-empty -- --all` is extremely slow and errors out.

3 messages from 2013-09-12 to 2013-09-13. Participants: John Gietzen, Felipe Contreras.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/34920

## John Gietzen, 2013-09-12 22:01

Subject: Converting repo from HG, `git filter-branch --prune-empty -- --all` is extremely slow and errors out.
Message-ID: <D4C9DBA5F955904683C89B4A96DA7759EA78D60FDF@synapsemail>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/D4C9DBA5F955904683C89B4A96DA7759EA78D60FDF%40synapsemail

```
Background:
Windows, git version 1.8.3.msysgit.0
bare repo, 54k commits after migration from HG
git filter-branch --prune-empty -- --all

I'm trying to clean up our repository after migrating it from HG.  I'm running the filter-branch command listed above in an effort to clean up all of garbage commits that HG required ("closing branch" commits and their ilk).

>From my past experience, "git filter-branch" is extremely quick when using simple filters, like env-filter, since it doesn't have to touch the working dir.  However, in our case each revision is taking 1-3 seconds; our entire repo will take 30 hours to clean up at this rate.  Normally, this wouldn't be a problem, except that we are getting "sh.exe couldn't start" errors after anywhere between the 5000th and 6000th rewritten commit.  Filter-branch doesn't have support for picking up where it left off, so we are entirely unable to clean up our repo. 

All that being said, I have 3 questions:
  1.  Is there anything I can do to speed up the filter-branch command? (Alternatively, is there a way I can profile git-filter-branch.sh on msysgit?)
  2.  Any idea why sh.exe would fail?
  3.  Is there a way I can resume the filter-branch command when/if it fails?  (Alternatively, is there a way I can do the filter-branch in pieces and efficiently rebase... or something?)

I have already had to modify git-filter-branch.sh myself (to support the immense number of refs we are rewriting), so I'm comfortable with that.

Any help you can offer would be appreciated.
 
Thanks in advance,
John Gietzen

```

## Felipe Contreras, 2013-09-13 00:47

Subject: Re: Converting repo from HG, `git filter-branch --prune-empty -- --all` is extremely slow and errors out.
Message-ID: <CAMP44s1cmcfSuB-TnFL+-57i5W=EA8v322rVDoUELCPF948jPw@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CAMP44s1cmcfSuB-TnFL%2B-57i5W%3DEA8v322rVDoUELCPF948jPw%40mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <D4C9DBA5F955904683C89B4A96DA7759EA78D60FDF@synapsemail>

```
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:01 PM, John Gietzen <jgietzen@woot.com> wrote:
> Background:
> Windows, git version 1.8.3.msysgit.0
> bare repo, 54k commits after migration from HG
> git filter-branch --prune-empty -- --all
>
> I'm trying to clean up our repository after migrating it from HG.  I'm running the filter-branch command listed above in an effort to clean up all of garbage commits that HG required ("closing branch" commits and their ilk).
>
> From my past experience, "git filter-branch" is extremely quick when using simple filters, like env-filter, since it doesn't have to touch the working dir.  However, in our case each revision is taking 1-3 seconds; our entire repo will take 30 hours to clean up at this rate.  Normally, this wouldn't be a problem, except that we are getting "sh.exe couldn't start" errors after anywhere between the 5000th and 6000th rewritten commit.  Filter-branch doesn't have support for picking up where it left off, so we are entirely unable to clean up our repo.

Indeed, I remember writing my own simplified version of 'git
filter-branch' that was much faster. If I recall correctly, the trick
was avoiding 'git write-tree' which can be done if you are not using
any tree filter, but 'git filter-branch' is not that smart.

If all you want to do is prune empty commits, it should be easy to
write a script that simply does 'git commit-tree'. I might decide to
do that based on my script if I have time today.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

```

## Felipe Contreras, 2013-09-13 09:15

Subject: Re: Converting repo from HG, `git filter-branch --prune-empty -- --all` is extremely slow and errors out.
Message-ID: <CAMP44s0gHKTgw3xm6qRnvJk9S=p7ndMU6cwt3Ju38pBWbO_Syg@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CAMP44s0gHKTgw3xm6qRnvJk9S%3Dp7ndMU6cwt3Ju38pBWbO_Syg%40mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s1cmcfSuB-TnFL+-57i5W=EA8v322rVDoUELCPF948jPw@mail.gmail.com>

```
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:

> Indeed, I remember writing my own simplified version of 'git
> filter-branch' that was much faster. If I recall correctly, the trick
> was avoiding 'git write-tree' which can be done if you are not using
> any tree filter, but 'git filter-branch' is not that smart.
>
> If all you want to do is prune empty commits, it should be easy to
> write a script that simply does 'git commit-tree'. I might decide to
> do that based on my script if I have time today.

Here it is, it's straightforward and should be easy to understand.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

```
