threads / discuss / 34336

git subtree push-all and pull-all

Subject: git subtree push-all and pull-all

## tl;dr

7 messages between Jul 3, 2013 and Jul 25, 2013.

replies: 6people: 4as markdown or json

Gareth Collins· Jul 3, 2013, 19:56 UTC · lore
Hello,

I see over the last year (on the web and in this mailing list) there was some activity to extend subtree with a .gittrees file and push-all/pull-all commands.

Perhaps I missed it, but looking through the latest git code on the github mirror I can't find any reference to the .gittrees file or these commands.

Does anyone know the status of this feature? Was it decided that this was a bad idea and the feature has been rejected? Or is this a feature still "cooking"...which will likely make it into git mainline at some point?

I ask because I would like to use something like this to be able to keep a combined repository and separate project repositories in sync. Of course, if it was decided that this feature is fundamentally a bad idea then I will do something different.

Any pointers would be a big help.

thanks in advance, Gareth Collins

Fredrik Gustafsson· Jul 7, 2013, 12:54 UTC · re: Gareth Collins · lore

Re: git subtree push-all and pull-all

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:56:36PM -0400, Gareth Collins wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Hello,
> 
> I see over the last year (on the web and in this mailing list) there
> was some activity to extend subtree with a .gittrees file and
> push-all/pull-all commands.
> 
> Perhaps I missed it, but looking through the latest git code on the
> github mirror I can't find any reference to the .gittrees file or
> these commands.
> 
> Does anyone know the status of this feature? Was it decided that this
> was a bad idea and the feature has been rejected? Or is this a feature
> still "cooking"...which will likely make it into git mainline at some
> point?
> 
> I ask because I would like to use something like this to be able to
> keep a combined repository and separate project repositories in sync.
> Of course, if it was decided that this feature is fundamentally a bad
> idea then I will do something different.
> 
> Any pointers would be a big help.
> 
> thanks in advance,
> Gareth Collins

Still no answer to this? I suggest that you CC the persons discussing this the last time.

-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar
Fredrik Gustafsson

tel: 0733-608274
e-post: iveqy@iveqy.com
Gareth Collins· Jul 8, 2013, 15:20 UTC · re: Fredrik Gustafsson · lore

Re: git subtree push-all and pull-all

Hello Fredrik,

Thanks for the suggestion! Adding in Paul Campbell and Herman Van Rink who worked on this before.

thanks again, Gareth

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> wrote:
Show 35 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:56:36PM -0400, Gareth Collins wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I see over the last year (on the web and in this mailing list) there
>> was some activity to extend subtree with a .gittrees file and
>> push-all/pull-all commands.
>>
>> Perhaps I missed it, but looking through the latest git code on the
>> github mirror I can't find any reference to the .gittrees file or
>> these commands.
>>
>> Does anyone know the status of this feature? Was it decided that this
>> was a bad idea and the feature has been rejected? Or is this a feature
>> still "cooking"...which will likely make it into git mainline at some
>> point?
>>
>> I ask because I would like to use something like this to be able to
>> keep a combined repository and separate project repositories in sync.
>> Of course, if it was decided that this feature is fundamentally a bad
>> idea then I will do something different.
>>
>> Any pointers would be a big help.
>>
>> thanks in advance,
>> Gareth Collins
>
> Still no answer to this? I suggest that you CC the persons discussing
> this the last time.
>
> --
> Med vänliga hälsningar
> Fredrik Gustafsson
>
> tel: 0733-608274
> e-post: iveqy@iveqy.com
Herman van Rink· Jul 9, 2013, 09:21 UTC · re: Gareth Collins · lore

Re: git subtree push-all and pull-all

On 08-07-13 17:20, Gareth Collins wrote:
> Hello Fredrik,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion! Adding in Paul Campbell and Herman Van Rink
> who worked on this before.

Paul Campbell has been working hard on multiple branches in https://github.com/kemitix/git But work appears to have stopped. :(

There is also a recent blogpost: http://ruleant.blogspot.nl/2013/06/git-subtree-module-with-gittrees-config.html

Thanks for your interest, I'd love to see this get integrated....
Show 39 quoted lines
>
> thanks again,
> Gareth
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:56:36PM -0400, Gareth Collins wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I see over the last year (on the web and in this mailing list) there
>>> was some activity to extend subtree with a .gittrees file and
>>> push-all/pull-all commands.
>>>
>>> Perhaps I missed it, but looking through the latest git code on the
>>> github mirror I can't find any reference to the .gittrees file or
>>> these commands.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know the status of this feature? Was it decided that this
>>> was a bad idea and the feature has been rejected? Or is this a feature
>>> still "cooking"...which will likely make it into git mainline at some
>>> point?
>>>
>>> I ask because I would like to use something like this to be able to
>>> keep a combined repository and separate project repositories in sync.
>>> Of course, if it was decided that this feature is fundamentally a bad
>>> idea then I will do something different.
>>>
>>> Any pointers would be a big help.
>>>
>>> thanks in advance,
>>> Gareth Collins
>> Still no answer to this? I suggest that you CC the persons discussing
>> this the last time.
>>
>> --
>> Med vänliga hälsningar
>> Fredrik Gustafsson
>>
>> tel: 0733-608274
>> e-post: iveqy@iveqy.com
-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / Regards,

Herman van Rink
Initfour websolutions
Paul Campbell· Jul 22, 2013, 19:35 UTC · re: Herman van Rink · lore

Re: git subtree push-all and pull-all

Hi,
Sorry for the delay. Not been monitoring the list lately.

I'm afraid work stopped for two reasons. Lack of interest from the list was the main one. I understand subtree isn't used much and subsequently there wasn't much interest in reviewing the patches I was putting out. As a result I lost interest.

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Herman van Rink <rink@initfour.nl> wrote:
Show 71 quoted lines
> On 08-07-13 17:20, Gareth Collins wrote:
>>
>> Hello Fredrik,
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion! Adding in Paul Campbell and Herman Van Rink
>> who worked on this before.
>
>
> Paul Campbell has been working hard on multiple branches in
> https://github.com/kemitix/git
> But work appears to have stopped. :(
>
> There is also a recent blogpost:
> http://ruleant.blogspot.nl/2013/06/git-subtree-module-with-gittrees-config.html
>
> Thanks for your interest, I'd love to see this get integrated....
>
>
>>
>> thanks again,
>> Gareth
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:56:36PM -0400, Gareth Collins wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I see over the last year (on the web and in this mailing list) there
>>>> was some activity to extend subtree with a .gittrees file and
>>>> push-all/pull-all commands.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps I missed it, but looking through the latest git code on the
>>>> github mirror I can't find any reference to the .gittrees file or
>>>> these commands.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know the status of this feature? Was it decided that this
>>>> was a bad idea and the feature has been rejected? Or is this a feature
>>>> still "cooking"...which will likely make it into git mainline at some
>>>> point?
>>>>
>>>> I ask because I would like to use something like this to be able to
>>>> keep a combined repository and separate project repositories in sync.
>>>> Of course, if it was decided that this feature is fundamentally a bad
>>>> idea then I will do something different.
>>>>
>>>> Any pointers would be a big help.
>>>>
>>>> thanks in advance,
>>>> Gareth Collins
>>>
>>> Still no answer to this? I suggest that you CC the persons discussing
>>> this the last time.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Med vänliga hälsningar
>>> Fredrik Gustafsson
>>>
>>> tel: 0733-608274
>>> e-post: iveqy@iveqy.com
>
>
>
> --
>
> Met vriendelijke groet / Regards,
>
> Herman van Rink
> Initfour websolutions
>
-- 
Paul [W] Campbell
Herman van Rink· Jul 25, 2013, 10:00 UTC · re: Paul Campbell · lore

Re: git subtree push-all and pull-all

On 22-07-13 21:35, Paul Campbell wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the delay. Not been monitoring the list lately.
>
> I'm afraid work stopped for two reasons. Lack of interest from the
> list was the main one. I understand subtree isn't used much and
> subsequently there wasn't much interest in reviewing the patches I was
> putting out. As a result I lost interest.
>

It seems to be hard to get anything done on such a busy list. :( Especially when the maintainers lack time/attention for such a contrib.

I think including it in the contrib folder has not done us any good.

Maybe we should just focus on maintaining a separate repo, which could be based of https://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree (which has already 92 forks, including one of mine). And obviously integrate all the recent work from Paul.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / Regards,

Herman van Rink
Initfour websolutions
Paul Campbell· Jul 25, 2013, 11:19 UTC · re: Herman van Rink · lore

Re: git subtree push-all and pull-all

I agree with the idea of maintaining git-subtree outside of contrib. However, you would need the commitment of apenwarr, or whoever hosts the master repo, to merge in any pull requests or we are no further forward. (apenwarr appears not to have been active on github since early May).

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Herman van Rink <rink@initfour.nl> wrote:
Show 30 quoted lines
> On 22-07-13 21:35, Paul Campbell wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay. Not been monitoring the list lately.
>>
>> I'm afraid work stopped for two reasons. Lack of interest from the
>> list was the main one. I understand subtree isn't used much and
>> subsequently there wasn't much interest in reviewing the patches I was
>> putting out. As a result I lost interest.
>>
>
> It seems to be hard to get anything done on such a busy list. :( Especially
> when the maintainers lack time/attention for such a contrib.
>
> I think including it in the contrib folder has not done us any good.
>
> Maybe we should just focus on maintaining a separate repo, which could be
> based of https://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree (which has already 92
> forks, including one of mine). And obviously integrate all the recent work
> from Paul.
>
>
> --
>
> Met vriendelijke groet / Regards,
>
> Herman van Rink
> Initfour websolutions
>
-- 
Paul [W] Campbell

← back to recent threads