threads / discuss / 32919

git clone combined with --depth, --branch and --single-branch

Subject: git clone combined with --depth, --branch and --single-branch

## tl;dr

4 messages between Feb 17, 2013 and Feb 17, 2013.

replies: 3people: 2as markdown or json

Thibault Kruse· Feb 17, 2013, 12:29 UTC · lore
Hi all,
Using git 1.7.10.4

I find the behavior or documentation of "git clone --single-branch" confusing. Docs currently say:

man git-clone
       --single-branch
           Clone only the history leading to the tip of a single
branch, either specified by the --branch option or the primary branch
remote�<80><99>s HEAD points
           at. When creating a shallow clone with the --depth option,
this is the default, unless --no-single-branch is given to fetch the
histories near
           the tips of all branches.

based onthis documentation, I cannot understand any of the results I get when combining --depth and --singe-branch.

I start with this repo1 (for how to createin linux, see bottom):
git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
* 4565162-5  (foo)
* 20ce846-4
* a0615eb-3
* fa4131d-2
* f0683bd-1  (bar)
| * 432b5ec-m1  (HEAD, master)
|/
* 39df203-0
git clone repo1 repo2 --depth 1
cd repo2
git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
* 432b5ec-m1  (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master)
* 39df203-0
# Why are branches "foo" and "bar" missing?
cd ..
git clone repo1 repo3 --depth 1 --branch foo
git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
* 4565162-5  (HEAD, origin/foo, foo)
* 20ce846-4
* a0615eb-3
* fa4131d-2
* f0683bd-1
| * 432b5ec-m1  (origin/master, origin/HEAD)
|/
* 39df203-0

# Why is --depth not having effect, and why is branch bar not there, yet master is?

cd ..
git clone repo1 repo4 --depth 1 --branch foo --single-branch
git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
* 4565162-5  (HEAD, origin/foo, foo)
* 20ce846-4
* a0615eb-3
* fa4131d-2
* f0683bd-1
| * 432b5ec-m1  (origin/master, origin/HEAD)
|/
* 39df203-0
# Why is --depth not having effect, and why is branch master still there?

################################### # Okay, so --depth seems to generally not work when cloning locally. So maybe when doing so from github:

git clone https://github.com/git/git --depth 1
cd git
git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
* 7b6e784-Update draft release notes to 1.8.2  (HEAD, origin/master,
origin/HEAD, master)
* 17e45f8-Merge branch
'wk/man-deny-current-branch-is-default-these-days'  (grafted)
git branch -a
* master
  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
  remotes/origin/master
git tag
>

# Why don't other branches appear here? # Hm, I'll add "--branch master" to the command

git clone https://github.com/git/git git3 --depth 1 --branch master
cd git3
git branch -a
* master
  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
  remotes/origin/master
  remotes/origin/next
  remotes/origin/pu
  remotes/origin/todo
git tag
> gitgui-0.10.0
> gitgui-0.10.1
> gitgui-0.10.2
> ...

# And why DO they appear here? Why do I now get all tags? # Same result for --branch next # okay, let's try adding --single-branch

git clone https://github.com/git/git git4 --depth 1 --branch next
--single-branch
cd git4
git branch -a
* next
  remotes/origin/next
  remotes/origin/pu
  remotes/origin/todo
# Now I don't get master, but I still get those other branches??? And also tags?

Now I am aware that a bug was fixed in git 1.8.0: https://raw.github.com/gitster/git/master/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.0.txt

 * A repository created with "git clone --single" had its fetch
   refspecs set up just like a clone without "--single", leading the
   subsequent "git fetch" to slurp all the other branches, defeating
   the whole point of specifying "only this branch".

But even considering that bug (and assuming it also affected git clone), the results I get for 1.7.10.4 seem all weird, and not really following the documentation.

So I am sorry I cannot phrase this as a single question, as the results are not consistent with each other or the documentation, and those results seem to be related.

cheers,
  Thibault Kruse
How to create local repo1:

mkdir repo1 cd repo1 git init echo 0 >> foo.txt git add foo.txt git commit -m 0 git co master -b bar echo 1 >> bar.txt git add bar.txt git commit -m 1 git co bar -b foo echo 2 >> foo.txt git add foo.txt git commit -m 2 echo 3 >> foo.txt git add foo.txt git commit -m 3 echo 4 >> foo.txt git add foo.txt git commit -m 4 echo 5 >> foo.txt git add foo.txt git commit -m 5 git co master echo 1 > master.txt git add master.txt git commit -m m1

Duy Nguyen· Feb 17, 2013, 14:32 UTC · re: Thibault Kruse · lore

Re: git clone combined with --depth, --branch and --single-branch

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Thibault Kruse <tibokruse@googlemail.com> wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines
> git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
> * 4565162-5  (foo)
> * 20ce846-4
> * a0615eb-3
> * fa4131d-2
> * f0683bd-1  (bar)
> | * 432b5ec-m1  (HEAD, master)
> |/
> * 39df203-0
>
> git clone repo1 repo2 --depth 1
> cd repo2
> git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
> * 432b5ec-m1  (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master)
> * 39df203-0
>
> # Why are branches "foo" and "bar" missing?

--depth implies --single-branch. Without explicit --branch, --single-branch will fetch HEAD. You need --no-single-branch to get foo and bar.

Show 14 quoted lines
> cd ..
> git clone repo1 repo3 --depth 1 --branch foo
> git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
> * 4565162-5  (HEAD, origin/foo, foo)
> * 20ce846-4
> * a0615eb-3
> * fa4131d-2
> * f0683bd-1
> | * 432b5ec-m1  (origin/master, origin/HEAD)
> |/
> * 39df203-0
>
> # Why is --depth not having effect, and why is branch bar not there,
> yet master is?

I'm not sure, but I can't reproduce it. There's an unreleased fix in depth calculation (682c7d2 (upload-pack: fix off-by-one depth calculation in shallow clone - 2013-01-11) that might affect this. You may want to try again with "master". I got this with the same command

* edbd6cb (grafted, HEAD, origin/foo, foo) 5
-- 
Duy
Thibault Kruse· Feb 17, 2013, 17:46 UTC · re: Duy Nguyen · lore

Re: git clone combined with --depth, --branch and --single-branch

Hi Duy,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Thibault Kruse
> <tibokruse@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
>> * 4565162-5  (foo)
>> * 20ce846-4
>> * a0615eb-3
>> * fa4131d-2
>> * f0683bd-1  (bar)
>> | * 432b5ec-m1  (HEAD, master)
>> |/
>> * 39df203-0
>>
>> git clone repo1 repo2 --depth 1
>> cd repo2
>> git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
>> * 432b5ec-m1  (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master)
>> * 39df203-0
>>
>> # Why are branches "foo" and "bar" missing?
>
> --depth implies --single-branch. Without explicit --branch,
> --single-branch will fetch HEAD. You need --no-single-branch to get
> foo and bar.

Agreed, sorry. I forgot that --depth implied --single-branch. Probably because it don't like that being a default that breaks behavior to versions that did not have the --single-branch feature. So this example is the only one which I agree does actually what can be expected from the documentation (with respect to branches. --depth also does not restrict the history length, but the example does not show it).

Show 16 quoted lines
>> cd ..
>> git clone repo1 repo3 --depth 1 --branch foo
>> git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
>> * 4565162-5  (HEAD, origin/foo, foo)
>> * 20ce846-4
>> * a0615eb-3
>> * fa4131d-2
>> * f0683bd-1
>> | * 432b5ec-m1  (origin/master, origin/HEAD)
>> |/
>> * 39df203-0
>>
>> # Why is --depth not having effect, and why is branch bar not there,
>> yet master is?
>
> I'm not sure, but I can't reproduce it.
Do you mean you cannot reproduce with 1.7.10.4?
So far I used ubuntu packaged versions, Here is what I got with master:
git --version
git version 1.8.1.3.619.g7b6e784
# added commit m2 and m3 to master branch in repo1 to show that
--depth is not working locally
git clone repo1 repo2 --depth 1
git log --pretty=format:'%h-%s %d' --graph --decorate  --all
* 704f0c4-m3  (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master)
* 7b90b28-m2
* 1fa92bd-m1
* 5da3517-0

So I still get the --depth not having affect locally, but I confirm all other cases I posted work as expected with 1.8.1.3.619.g7b6e784. Meaning --depth works from a remote repo, and --single-branch (implied by depth) really just creates that branch locally.

I don't even know where to start looking for why --depth has no effect for disk-local remotes. I don't have the git command aliased, and in repo1, I get: alias.br=branch alias.co=checkout alias.ci=commit alias.di=diff alias.st=status alias.mt=mergetool alias.pr=pull --rebase alias.ri=rebase --interactive alias.sa=stash apply alias.c-p=cherry-pick alias.lg=!git log --pretty=format:%h%x09%an%x09%ad%x09%s alias.lgg=log --graph --pretty=format:'%Cred%h%Creset -%C(yellow)%d%Creset %s %Cgreen(%cr) %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset' --abbrev-commit --date=relative alias.top=!eval cd $(pwd)/$(git rev-parse --show-cdup) && pwd core.excludesfile=/home/kruset/.bashconfig/gitignore.global core.repositoryformatversion=0 core.filemode=true core.bare=false core.logallrefupdates=true

Not sure whether any of the "core" properties can cause this.
Thibault Kruse· Feb 17, 2013, 19:10 UTC · lore

Fwd: git clone combined with --depth, --branch and --single-branch

Actually, using git 1.8.3, I get:

git clone repo1 repo2 --depth 1 warning: --depth is ignored in local clones; use file:// instead. ...

So I guess the warning says it all, it helps to read it.

← back to recent threads