# Re: Question re. git remote repository

1 messages from 2013-01-17 to 2013-01-17. Participants: Matt Seitz.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/32654

## Matt Seitz, 2013-01-17 05:20

Subject: Re: Question re. git remote repository
Message-ID: <1BBEF94B6B46E54980290D150A6F2EDD46B718CB@BLUPRD0612MB625.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1BBEF94B6B46E54980290D150A6F2EDD46B718CB%40BLUPRD0612MB625.namprd06.prod.outlook.com

```
"David Lang" <david@lang.hm> wrote in message news:<alpine.DEB.2.02.1301161843390.21503@nftneq.ynat.uz>...
> >>
> >> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
> >>
> >>> 2. a repository where only one user does "git add" and "git commit",
> >> while other users will do "git pull", the peer-to-peer model (you pull changes
> >> from me, I pull changes from you).
> >>
> 
> you may _be_ safe, and if others who really know the internals speak up, take 
> their word on it. 

Well, we already have Linus's article.  I guess the question is whether the use case I describe above falls under:

A. "maintenance operations"

B. "normal git workflow"

Personally, I would consider this use case to be a "normal git workflow".

```