# [PATCH] completion: add option --recurse-submodules to "git push" 4 messages from 2012-12-07 to 2012-12-18. Participants: Steffen Jaeckel, Junio C Hamano, Felipe Contreras, Heiko Voigt. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/32284 ## Steffen Jaeckel, 2012-12-07 12:28 Subject: [PATCH] completion: add option --recurse-submodules to "git push" Message-ID: <1354883304-6860-1-git-send-email-steffen.jaeckel@stzedn.de> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1354883304-6860-1-git-send-email-steffen.jaeckel%40stzedn.de ``` Signed-off-by: Steffen Jaeckel --- contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash index 0b77eb1..5b4d2e1 100644 --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash @@ -1434,6 +1434,10 @@ _git_pull () __git_complete_remote_or_refspec } +__git_push_recurse_submodules_options=" + check on-demand +" + _git_push () { case "$prev" in @@ -1446,10 +1450,15 @@ _git_push () __gitcomp_nl "$(__git_remotes)" "" "${cur##--repo=}" return ;; + --recurse-submodules=*) + __gitcomp "$__git_push_recurse_submodules_options" "" "${cur##--recurse-submodules=}" + return + ;; --*) __gitcomp " --all --mirror --tags --dry-run --force --verbose --receive-pack= --repo= --set-upstream + --recurse-submodules= " return ;; -- 1.8.0.msysgit.0 ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2012-12-07 17:21 Subject: Re: [PATCH] completion: add option --recurse-submodules to "git push" Message-ID: <7vehj1ixr6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vehj1ixr6.fsf%40alter.siamese.dyndns.org In-Reply-To: <1354883304-6860-1-git-send-email-steffen.jaeckel@stzedn.de> ``` Steffen Jaeckel writes: > Signed-off-by: Steffen Jaeckel > --- > contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > index 0b77eb1..5b4d2e1 100644 > --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > @@ -1434,6 +1434,10 @@ _git_pull () > __git_complete_remote_or_refspec > } > > +__git_push_recurse_submodules_options=" > + check on-demand > +" Most of the existing completion functions do not seem to define separate variables like this; instead, they literally embed their choices at the point of use. Is it expected that the same set of choices will appear in the completion of many other subcommand options? [jc: Cc'ed Heiko so that we can sanity check the answer to this question]. If so, the variable may be justified; otherwise, not. > _git_push () > { > case "$prev" in > @@ -1446,10 +1450,15 @@ _git_push () > __gitcomp_nl "$(__git_remotes)" "" "${cur##--repo=}" > return > ;; > + --recurse-submodules=*) > + __gitcomp "$__git_push_recurse_submodules_options" "" "${cur##--recurse-submodules=}" > + return > + ;; Owners of the completion script, does this look reasonable? [jc: Cc'ed Felipe for this] This is a tangent, but why is it a double-hash "##" not a single-hash "#", other than "because all others use ##"? > --*) > __gitcomp " > --all --mirror --tags --dry-run --force --verbose > --receive-pack= --repo= --set-upstream > + --recurse-submodules= > " > return > ;; ``` ## Felipe Contreras, 2012-12-12 22:30 Subject: Re: [PATCH] completion: add option --recurse-submodules to "git push" Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CAMP44s2GYoR1fM-jEj9inO58ATgix5FuZouqZg2%2BtU47BOaTew%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: <7vehj1ixr6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> ``` On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Steffen Jaeckel writes: > >> Signed-off-by: Steffen Jaeckel >> --- >> contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 9 +++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash >> index 0b77eb1..5b4d2e1 100644 >> --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash >> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash >> @@ -1434,6 +1434,10 @@ _git_pull () >> __git_complete_remote_or_refspec >> } >> >> +__git_push_recurse_submodules_options=" >> + check on-demand >> +" > > Most of the existing completion functions do not seem to define > separate variables like this; instead, they literally embed their > choices at the point of use. > > Is it expected that the same set of choices will appear in the > completion of many other subcommand options? [jc: Cc'ed Heiko so > that we can sanity check the answer to this question]. If so, the > variable may be justified; otherwise, not. > >> _git_push () >> { >> case "$prev" in >> @@ -1446,10 +1450,15 @@ _git_push () >> __gitcomp_nl "$(__git_remotes)" "" "${cur##--repo=}" >> return >> ;; >> + --recurse-submodules=*) >> + __gitcomp "$__git_push_recurse_submodules_options" "" "${cur##--recurse-submodules=}" >> + return >> + ;; > > Owners of the completion script, does this look reasonable? > [jc: Cc'ed Felipe for this] > > This is a tangent, but why is it a double-hash "##" not a > single-hash "#", other than "because all others use ##"? Seems OK by me, but I agree, the options should be inline. -- Felipe Contreras ``` ## Heiko Voigt, 2012-12-18 17:59 Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] completion: add option --recurse-submodules to "git push" Message-ID: <20121218175942.GA26151@book.hvoigt.net> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20121218175942.GA26151%40book.hvoigt.net In-Reply-To: <7vehj1ixr6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> ``` Hi, sorry for the late reply. On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:21:33AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Steffen Jaeckel writes: > > > Signed-off-by: Steffen Jaeckel > > --- > > contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > > index 0b77eb1..5b4d2e1 100644 > > --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > > +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > > @@ -1434,6 +1434,10 @@ _git_pull () > > __git_complete_remote_or_refspec > > } > > > > +__git_push_recurse_submodules_options=" > > + check on-demand > > +" > > Most of the existing completion functions do not seem to define > separate variables like this; instead, they literally embed their > choices at the point of use. > > Is it expected that the same set of choices will appear in the > completion of many other subcommand options? [jc: Cc'ed Heiko so > that we can sanity check the answer to this question]. If so, the > variable may be justified; otherwise, not. No I think not. At least not exactly the same. check will be limited to push since it only makes sense there. on-demand on the other hand is already used for fetch and pull. Currently no more possible uses come to my mind. checkout and others will learn to traverse submodules but that will most likely be a boolean (to switch it on and off). CC'ed Jens so he can also take a look. Cheers Heiko ```