threads / discuss / 31727

Re: fa/remote-svn (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2012, #01; Tue, 2))

Subject: Re: fa/remote-svn (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2012, #01; Tue, 2))

## tl;dr

3 messages between Oct 4, 2012 and Oct 4, 2012.

replies: 2people: 3as markdown or json

Jonathan Nieder· Oct 4, 2012, 08:30 UTC · lore

David Michael Barr wrote:

> On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 at 9:20 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 24 quoted lines

>> * fa/remote-svn (2012-09-19) 16 commits
>> - Add a test script for remote-svn
>> - remote-svn: add marks-file regeneration
>> - Add a svnrdump-simulator replaying a dump file for testing
>> - remote-svn: add incremental import
>> - remote-svn: Activate import/export-marks for fast-import
>> - Create a note for every imported commit containing svn metadata
>> - vcs-svn: add fast_export_note to create notes
>> - Allow reading svn dumps from files via file:// urls
>> - remote-svn, vcs-svn: Enable fetching to private refs
>> - When debug==1, start fast-import with "--stats" instead of "--quiet"
>> - Add documentation for the 'bidi-import' capability of remote-helpers
>> - Connect fast-import to the remote-helper via pipe, adding 'bidi-import' capability
>> - Add argv_array_detach and argv_array_free_detached
>> - Add svndump_init_fd to allow reading dumps from arbitrary FDs
>> - Add git-remote-testsvn to Makefile
>> - Implement a remote helper for svn in C
>> (this branch is used by fa/vcs-svn.)
>>
>> A GSoC project.
>> Waiting for comments from mentors and stakeholders.
>
> I have reviewed this topic and am happy with the design and implementation.
> I support this topic for inclusion.

Thanks! I'll try moving the tests to the first patch and trying it and hopefully send out a branch to pull tomorrow.

If I don't send anything tomorrow, that's probably a sign that I never will, so since I like the goal of the series I guess it would be a kind of implied ack.

Jonathan

Stephen Bash· Oct 4, 2012, 13:16 UTC · re: Jonathan Nieder · lore

----- Original Message -----

Show 38 quoted lines

> From: "Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 4:30:01 AM
> Subject: Re: fa/remote-svn (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2012, #01; Tue, 2))
> 
> > > * fa/remote-svn (2012-09-19) 16 commits
> > > - Add a test script for remote-svn
> > > - remote-svn: add marks-file regeneration
> > > - Add a svnrdump-simulator replaying a dump file for testing
> > > - remote-svn: add incremental import
> > > - remote-svn: Activate import/export-marks for fast-import
> > > - Create a note for every imported commit containing svn metadata
> > > - vcs-svn: add fast_export_note to create notes
> > > - Allow reading svn dumps from files via file:// urls
> > > - remote-svn, vcs-svn: Enable fetching to private refs
> > > - When debug==1, start fast-import with "--stats" instead of
> > > "--quiet"
> > > - Add documentation for the 'bidi-import' capability of
> > > remote-helpers
> > > - Connect fast-import to the remote-helper via pipe, adding
> > > 'bidi-import' capability
> > > - Add argv_array_detach and argv_array_free_detached
> > > - Add svndump_init_fd to allow reading dumps from arbitrary FDs
> > > - Add git-remote-testsvn to Makefile
> > > - Implement a remote helper for svn in C
> > > (this branch is used by fa/vcs-svn.)
> > >
> > > A GSoC project.
> > > Waiting for comments from mentors and stakeholders.
> >
> > I have reviewed this topic and am happy with the design and
> > implementation.  I support this topic for inclusion.
> 
> Thanks!  I'll try moving the tests to the first patch and trying it
> and hopefully send out a branch to pull tomorrow.
> 
> If I don't send anything tomorrow, that's probably a sign that I never
> will, so since I like the goal of the series I guess it would be a
> kind of implied ack.

I seemed to have missed the GSoC wrap up conversation... (links happily accepted) Looking at the big picture (as much as I can remember) it seems to me the missing pieces now are branch mapping (lots of hard work), and possibly parts (all?) of the "push to SVN" functionality?

Thoughts?

Thanks, Stephen

Junio C Hamano· Oct 4, 2012, 16:30 UTC · re: Stephen Bash · lore

Stephen Bash <bash@genarts.com> writes:

> I seemed to have missed the GSoC wrap up conversation... (links happily
> accepted).

I also seem to have missed such conversation, if anything like that happened. It certainly would have been nice for the mentors and the student for each project to give us a two-to-three-paragraphs summary.

As GSoC is a Google event and not the Git community one, I wouldn't *demand* a concluding write-up, but it still took considerable community resource, so...