Hi,
Thank you for the detailed presentation posted on git.or.cz site.
One question: is there any equivalent config spec file for GIT as is in ClearCase today?
Thanks, Radu M. +40 21 203 6611
Hi,
Thank you for the detailed presentation posted on git.or.cz site.
One question: is there any equivalent config spec file for GIT as is in ClearCase today?
Thanks, Radu M. +40 21 203 6611
Re: congif spec in GIT
On 7/6/2012 6:46 AM, Radu Manea wrote:
> > Thank you for the detailed presentation posted on git.or.cz site. > > One question: is there any equivalent config spec file for GIT as is in > ClearCase today? >
I don't know clearcase, but have you looked at git-config manpage? http://git-htmldocs.googlecode.com/git/git-config.html
v/r, neal
Re: congif spec in GIT
Radu Manea skrev 2012-07-06 13.46:
> Hi, > > Thank you for the detailed presentation posted on git.or.cz site. > > One question: is there any equivalent config spec file for GIT as is in ClearCase today?
Repo (http://source.android.com/source/version-control.html) is perhaps the tool that is most similar in functionality to the config spec. It allows you to perform operations over multiple repositories.
-- robin
Re: congif spec in GIT
On 06.07.12 13:46, Radu Manea wrote:
> Hi, > > Thank you for the detailed presentation posted on git.or.cz site. > > One question: is there any equivalent config spec file for GIT as is in ClearCase today?
There are similarities, and differences between git and ClearCase, I can only point out the very basic differences, because the philosophy of these 2 tools is completely different.
CC has a "virtual file system", often mounted on /vobs on Unix, and M:\ (or another drive name) on Windows.
CC simulates a file system, where files are seen according to the config spec. Changing the config spec will change the version of the files seen under /vobs immediately.
If you want a copy of all the files on your local disk, you need to create a "snapshot view". After changing the config spec, the snapshot view needs to be updated.
git always has a "working tree", similar to a "snapshot view" (except for "bare repositories", they correspond to a CC server)
CC uses branches git uses branches
CC uses labels git uses commit ids, A tag may point to a commit id
CC defines for each file/directory which label is used
When a file is checked out, a branch is created for that file element
different directories may use different branches
- git uses the same branch for the whole repoCC uses labels for each directory, whatever the config spec say for that very directory. - git uses a commit id as a base for that branch.
So if try to transform "a branch in git" into a config spec, we do:
$ git status # On branch my_feature_branch (and that branch is defined on the whole working tree, similar to /vobs/projects/git/tb)
If I open the "engine bonnet" of git, to see what that means technically, I run on the command line:
$ cat .git/HEAD ref: refs/heads/my_feature_branch (we are on branch my_feature_branch)
When I dig further:
$ cat .git/refs/heads/my_feature_branch a5b0a8ff7f48cfd5ea19712680c64a029e99c2ba
We see that my branch is taking commit a5b08ff7 as a base line
So a "config spec" could include 3 lines, kind of "all files are CHECKOUT/CHECKIN" "All files are based on commit id a5b0a8ff7f48cfd5ea19712680c64a029e99c2ba" "If you commit one or more files at once, they are recorded on branch "my_feature_branch"
HTH /Torsten