threads / discuss / 30520
Subject: Finding all branches(remote and local) include given commit?
Yi, EungJunIs there any way to find remote and local branches include given commit?
e.g.
$ git branch --all --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f * master remotes/origin/next
As you know, it does not work and "git branch --contains" finds only local branches.
Carlos Martín NietoRe: Finding all branches(remote and local) include given commit?
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 20:42 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote:
> Is there any way to find remote and local branches include given commit? > > e.g. > > $ git branch --all --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f > * master > remotes/origin/next > > As you know, it does not work and "git branch --contains" finds only > local branches.
Works For Me. What version are you trying it with? Are you sure that remote-tracking branches do contain that commit?
>From a quick look through the log and release notes, it was never
mentioned as a fix. The log contains 3f7701a4 from 2007 which fixes 'git describe --all --contains' which, though unlikely, might be related. This commit was however part of release 1.5.4, which makes it unlikely you'd be using something older.
cmn
Yi, EungJunRe: Finding all branches(remote and local) include given commit?
Wow, I should do like this:
$ git branch -a --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f * master remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/master remotes/origin/next remotes/origin/pu
git-branch has '-a' but not '-all', and git-remote has '--all' but not '-a'.
This is a bit confusing for me. Why don't the two commands have the option under the same name?
2012/5/12 Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>:
> On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 20:42 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote: >> Is there any way to find remote and local branches include given commit? >> >> e.g. >> >> $ git branch --all --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f >> * master >> remotes/origin/next >> >> As you know, it does not work and "git branch --contains" finds only >> local branches. > > Works For Me. What version are you trying it with? Are you sure that > remote-tracking branches do contain that commit? > > From a quick look through the log and release notes, it was never > mentioned as a fix. The log contains 3f7701a4 from 2007 which fixes 'git > describe --all --contains' which, though unlikely, might be related. > This commit was however part of release 1.5.4, which makes it unlikely > you'd be using something older. > > cmn >
Yi, EungJunRe: Finding all branches(remote and local) include given commit?
Oops, it's just my mistake. git-remote also does not have '--all' option.
2012/5/12 Yi, EungJun <semtlenori@gmail.com>:
> Wow, I should do like this: > > $ git branch -a --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f > * master > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master > remotes/origin/master > remotes/origin/next > remotes/origin/pu > > git-branch has '-a' but not '-all', and git-remote has '--all' but not '-a'. > > This is a bit confusing for me. Why don't the two commands have the > option under the same name? > > > 2012/5/12 Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>: >> On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 20:42 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote: >>> Is there any way to find remote and local branches include given commit? >>> >>> e.g. >>> >>> $ git branch --all --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f >>> * master >>> remotes/origin/next >>> >>> As you know, it does not work and "git branch --contains" finds only >>> local branches. >> >> Works For Me. What version are you trying it with? Are you sure that >> remote-tracking branches do contain that commit? >> >> From a quick look through the log and release notes, it was never >> mentioned as a fix. The log contains 3f7701a4 from 2007 which fixes 'git >> describe --all --contains' which, though unlikely, might be related. >> This commit was however part of release 1.5.4, which makes it unlikely >> you'd be using something older. >> >> cmn >>
Carlos Martín NietoRe: Finding all branches(remote and local) include given commit?
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 21:25 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote:
> Wow, I should do like this: > > $ git branch -a --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f > * master > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master > remotes/origin/master > remotes/origin/next > remotes/origin/pu > > git-branch has '-a' but not '-all', and git-remote has '--all' but not '-a'.
The branch command has had long-form since 1.7.8
> > This is a bit confusing for me. Why don't the two commands have the > option under the same name? > > > 2012/5/12 Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>: > > On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 20:42 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote: > >> Is there any way to find remote and local branches include given commit? > >> > >> e.g. > >> > >> $ git branch --all --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f > >> * master > >> remotes/origin/next > >> > >> As you know, it does not work and "git branch --contains" finds only > >> local branches. > > > > Works For Me. What version are you trying it with? Are you sure that > > remote-tracking branches do contain that commit? > > > > From a quick look through the log and release notes, it was never > > mentioned as a fix. The log contains 3f7701a4 from 2007 which fixes 'git > > describe --all --contains' which, though unlikely, might be related. > > This commit was however part of release 1.5.4, which makes it unlikely > > you'd be using something older. > > > > cmn > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
Yi, EungJunRe: Finding all branches(remote and local) include given commit?
> The branch command has had long-form since 1.7.8
That sounds good to me! Thanks for letting me know.
2012/5/12 Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>:
> On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 21:25 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote: >> Wow, I should do like this: >> >> $ git branch -a --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f >> * master >> remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master >> remotes/origin/master >> remotes/origin/next >> remotes/origin/pu >> >> git-branch has '-a' but not '-all', and git-remote has '--all' but not '-a'. > > The branch command has had long-form since 1.7.8 > >> >> This is a bit confusing for me. Why don't the two commands have the >> option under the same name? >> >> >> 2012/5/12 Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>: >> > On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 20:42 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote: >> >> Is there any way to find remote and local branches include given commit? >> >> >> >> e.g. >> >> >> >> $ git branch --all --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f >> >> * master >> >> remotes/origin/next >> >> >> >> As you know, it does not work and "git branch --contains" finds only >> >> local branches. >> > >> > Works For Me. What version are you trying it with? Are you sure that >> > remote-tracking branches do contain that commit? >> > >> > From a quick look through the log and release notes, it was never >> > mentioned as a fix. The log contains 3f7701a4 from 2007 which fixes 'git >> > describe --all --contains' which, though unlikely, might be related. >> > This commit was however part of release 1.5.4, which makes it unlikely >> > you'd be using something older. >> > >> > cmn >> > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > >