threads / discuss / 29236

Patch to support proxy authentication through NTLM?

Subject: Patch to support proxy authentication through NTLM?

## tl;dr

3 messages between Dec 22, 2011 and Dec 23, 2011.

replies: 2people: 3as markdown or json

Schmidt, Marco· Dec 22, 2011, 08:45 UTC · lore

 
After debugging git proxy authentication and creating my own fix to
support git+https over an NTLM proxy I found a set of patches inside of
the mailing list archives [1]. What is the state of this patch set? The
essence of the patch would be to allow NTLM authentification by giving
the correct options to libcurl.
 
Marco 
 
E: marco point schmidt at taugamma.de 
 
 
[1] http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2009/2/2/4873274

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason· Dec 23, 2011, 01:43 UTC · re: Schmidt, Marco · lore

Re: Patch to support proxy authentication through NTLM?

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 09:45, Schmidt, Marco <Marco.Schmidt@cassidian.com> wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines

> After debugging git proxy authentication and creating my own fix to
> support git+https over an NTLM proxy I found a set of patches inside of
> the mailing list archives [1]. What is the state of this patch set? The
> essence of the patch would be to allow NTLM authentification by giving
> the correct options to libcurl.

~Weekly Junio sends out a "What's cooking in Git" E-Mail. Things that aren't listed there aren't being actively considered for inclusion.

Which means that if you're interested in it the best thing you can do is to take that patch, rebase it on top of master, make sure it works, and re-submit it.

See Documentation/SubmittingPatches and one of those E-Mails Junios sends out for more info.

Junio C Hamano· Dec 23, 2011, 02:34 UTC · re: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason · lore

Re: Patch to support proxy authentication through NTLM?

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

> Which means that if you're interested in it the best thing you can do
> is to take that patch, rebase it on top of master, make sure it works,
> and re-submit it.

In the case of that particular patch, it appears to take more than that, unless you meant "make it work" by "make sure it works". The discussion following patch seems to indicate that it was very broken and not working at all, and then the patch submitter disappeared.