threads / discuss / 28671

defined behaviour for multiple urls for a remote

Subject: defined behaviour for multiple urls for a remote

## tl;dr

4 messages between Oct 14, 2011 and Oct 17, 2011.

replies: 3people: 2as markdown or json

Sitaram Chamarty· Oct 14, 2011, 07:07 UTC · lore
Hi,
What's the defined behaviour if I do this:
[remote "both"]
	url = https://code.google.com/p/gitolite/
        url = git@github.com:sitaramc/gitolite.git

I know what I'm seeing (a fetch only goes to the first URL, and does a HEAD->FETCH_HEAD because I didn't provide a refspec line, while a push seems to push all to both), but I was curious what the official position is, because I couldn't find it in the docs.

-- 
Sitaram
Kirill Likhodedov· Oct 14, 2011, 09:36 UTC · re: Sitaram Chamarty · lore

Re: defined behaviour for multiple urls for a remote

Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc <at> gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> What's the defined behaviour if I do this:
> 
> [remote "both"]
> 	url = https://code.google.com/p/gitolite/
>         url = git <at> github.com:sitaramc/gitolite.git
> 
> I know what I'm seeing (a fetch only goes to the first URL, and does a
> HEAD->FETCH_HEAD because I didn't provide a refspec line, while a push
> seems to push all to both), but I was curious what the official
> position is, because I couldn't find it in the docs.
Please see the message from Linus about that: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=116231242118202&w=2
You also may check how Git understands your remotes by running
  git remote -v
It will show, where it is going to fetch from and push to.
I agree though, that documentation should be updated.
Sitaram Chamarty· Oct 14, 2011, 14:01 UTC · re: Kirill Likhodedov · lore

Re: defined behaviour for multiple urls for a remote

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Kirill Likhodedov <Kirill.Likhodedov@jetbrains.com> wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines
> Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> What's the defined behaviour if I do this:
>>
>> [remote "both"]
>>       url = https://code.google.com/p/gitolite/
>>         url = git <at> github.com:sitaramc/gitolite.git
>>
>> I know what I'm seeing (a fetch only goes to the first URL, and does a
>> HEAD->FETCH_HEAD because I didn't provide a refspec line, while a push
>> seems to push all to both), but I was curious what the official
>> position is, because I couldn't find it in the docs.
>
> Please see the message from Linus about that: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=116231242118202&w=2
cool; thanks!
> You also may check how Git understands your remotes by running
>  git remote -v
Aah that's very clear!
> It will show, where it is going to fetch from and push to.
>
> I agree though, that documentation should be updated.
well if it never came up once in the 5 years since Linus wrote that email... :-)
Sitaram Chamarty· Oct 17, 2011, 03:41 UTC · re: Kirill Likhodedov · lore

Re: defined behaviour for multiple urls for a remote

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Kirill Likhodedov <Kirill.Likhodedov@jetbrains.com> wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines
> Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> What's the defined behaviour if I do this:
>>
>> [remote "both"]
>>       url = https://code.google.com/p/gitolite/
>>         url = git <at> github.com:sitaramc/gitolite.git
>>
>> I know what I'm seeing (a fetch only goes to the first URL, and does a
>> HEAD->FETCH_HEAD because I didn't provide a refspec line, while a push
>> seems to push all to both), but I was curious what the official
>> position is, because I couldn't find it in the docs.
>
> Please see the message from Linus about that: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=116231242118202&w=2
cool; thanks!
> You also may check how Git understands your remotes by running
>  git remote -v
Aah that's very clear!
> It will show, where it is going to fetch from and push to.
>
> I agree though, that documentation should be updated.
well in theory yes, but now that you mention it, 'git remote -v' is sufficient.

← back to recent threads