Hi,
I was thinking about a sort of symmetric to rebase, a kind of "intelligent" mass cherry-pick. For the sake of example let's call it "basere", although a better name would have to be found.
While git rebase UPSTREAM moves the *current* branch (and any commit in it, but not in UPSTREAM) on top of UPSTREAM, git basere UPSTREAM would "cherry-pick" all commits in UPSTREAM that are not in HEAD to the current branch.
git cherry-pick ..UPSTREAM *nearly* does what I want, except that it lacks rebase's intelligence of skipping commits that do the same textual changes as a commit already in the current branch. So maybe it should be an option to cherry-pick rather than a new command? E.g. --skip-same? What about making it cherry-picks *default* behaviour?
Why do I think it is useful? Take the case of a developer following two different origins A and B, and B uses rebase (not merge) to integrate changes from A, but not as often as one would like. A could for example be the "official" tree (e.g. linux Linus tree), and B a feature branch of a developer that is meant to eventually go into A "cleanly" at some future time and A's policy is that one has to rebase before sending a merge request. Then another developer wants to keep up with changes from *both* A and B. So, the situation could look like:
A---A---A remotes/A/master
/
X---X---B0---B1---L master
\
B0---B1---B2--B3 remotes/B/masterSo one does "git rebase remotes/A/master master" and one gets
A---A---A---B0---B1---L master
/
X---X
\
B0---B1---B2--B3 remotes/B/masterI'd like to go to the situation:
A---A---A---B0---B1---L---B2--B3 master
/
X---X
\
B0---B1---B2--B3 remotes/B/masterWithout having to manually find the cutoff point "B2" (or worse, if the history is more messy than that, as in:
A---A---A---B1---L master
/
X---X
\
B0---B1---B2--B3 remotes/B/master
)The best way I have found to do that is:
git fetch B git checkout --no-track -b TMP remotes/B/master git rebase master git checkout master git merge --ff-only TMP git branch -d TMP
or less commands but more messy/fragile (and more work for git):
git fetch B git tag TMP git rebase remotes/B/master git rebase TMP git tag -d TMP
but that is rather onerous for something that should be just one command.
So what are your thoughts on that?
- Good idea? Would you take a patch that does something like that?
- Should it be cherry-picks's default behaviour?
- An option to cherry-pick?
- A new command? What name? Maybe "multi-cherry-pick"?
- An option to rebase, e.g. "--pull" or "--incoming" or "--here"?
("--pull" is probably too confusing wrt to "git pull"; people will
have trouble remembering which is which between "git pull
--rebase" and "git rebase --pull"...)-- Lionel