# [PATCH] do not read beyond end of malloc'd buffer

3 messages from 2011-05-20 to 2011-05-21. Participants: Jim Meyering, Junio C Hamano.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/27418

## Jim Meyering, 2011-05-20 17:20

Subject: [PATCH] do not read beyond end of malloc'd buffer
Message-ID: <877h9lb86r.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/877h9lb86r.fsf%40rho.meyering.net

```
I was surprised to see "git diff --word-diff" output a ton of
garbage, and tracked it down to a bug that's triggered when the
diff.suppress-blank-empty config option to true and when at least
one of the context lines is empty.

Here's a quick demo you can run in an empty directory:

    printf 'a\n\n[-b-]{+c+}\n' > exp
    git init && git config diff.suppress-blank-empty true
    printf 'a\n\nb\n' > f && git add . && git commit -m. .
    printf 'a\n\nc\n' > f
    git diff --word-diff | tail -3 > out
    diff out exp

Before the patch, the git diff ... command would read from beyond
the end of a heap buffer, and "out" would contain far more than the
expected 5 bytes.

Here's the patch:

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] do not read beyond end of malloc'd buffer

With diff.suppress-blank-empty=true, "git diff --word-diff" would
output data that had been read from uninitialized heap memory.
The problem was that fn_out_consume did not account for the
possibility of a line with length 1, i.e., the empty context line
that diff.suppress-blank-empty=true converts from " \n" to "\n".
Since it assumed there would always be a prefix character (the space),
it decremented "len" unconditionally, thus passing len=0 to emit_line,
which would then blindly call emit_line_0 with len=-1 which would
pass that value on to fwrite as SIZE_MAX.  Boom.

Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
---
 diff.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/diff.c b/diff.c
index ba5f7aa..57eea74 100644
--- a/diff.c
+++ b/diff.c
@@ -1117,8 +1117,13 @@ static void fn_out_consume(void *priv, char *line, unsigned long len)
 			emit_line(ecbdata->opt, plain, reset, line, len);
 			fputs("~\n", ecbdata->opt->file);
 		} else {
-			/* don't print the prefix character */
-			emit_line(ecbdata->opt, plain, reset, line+1, len-1);
+			/* If there is a prefix character, skip it.
+			   With diff_suppress_blank_empty, there may be none. */
+			if (line[0] != '\n') {
+			      line++;
+			      len--;
+			}
+			emit_line(ecbdata->opt, plain, reset, line, len);
 		}
 		return;
 	}
--
1.7.5.2.316.gbcebc8b

```

## Junio C Hamano, 2011-05-20 18:41

Subject: Re: [PATCH] do not read beyond end of malloc'd buffer
Message-ID: <7vfwo92p19.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vfwo92p19.fsf%40alter.siamese.dyndns.org
In-Reply-To: <877h9lb86r.fsf@rho.meyering.net>

```
Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net> writes:

> I was surprised to see "git diff --word-diff" output a ton of
> garbage, and tracked it down to a bug that's triggered when the
> diff.suppress-blank-empty config option to true and when at least
> one of the context lines is empty.

Heh, I am not that surprised ;-) 

I think the real culprit is a year-old 882749a (diff: add --word-diff
option that generalizes --color-words, 2010-04-14); it probably shows that
not many people use diff.s-b-e settings?

>     printf 'a\n\n[-b-]{+c+}\n' > exp
>     git init && git config diff.suppress-blank-empty true
>     printf 'a\n\nb\n' > f && git add . && git commit -m. .
>     printf 'a\n\nc\n' > f
>     git diff --word-diff | tail -3 > out
>     diff out exp
>
> Before the patch, the git diff ... command would read from beyond
> the end of a heap buffer, and "out" would contain far more than the
> expected 5 bytes.

It is a bit unfortunate that we cannot make this into a test script, as it
depends on what is on the uninitialized part of the heap, which might
happen to be a NUL in which case the test would pass.

Running tests under the valgrind mode may catch issues, though.

Thanks. Will queue with this test squashed in.

diff --git a/t/t4034-diff-words.sh b/t/t4034-diff-words.sh
index 37aeab0..c374aa4 100755
--- a/t/t4034-diff-words.sh
+++ b/t/t4034-diff-words.sh
@@ -307,4 +307,30 @@ test_language_driver python
 test_language_driver ruby
 test_language_driver tex
 
+test_expect_success 'word-diff with diff.sbe' '
+	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+	diff --git a/pre b/post
+	index a1a53b5..bc8fe6d 100644
+	--- a/pre
+	+++ b/post
+	@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
+	a
+
+	[-b-]{+c+}
+	EOF
+	cat >pre <<-\EOF &&
+	a
+
+	b
+	EOF
+	cat >post <<-\EOF &&
+	a
+
+	c
+	EOF
+	test_when_finished "git config --unset diff.suppress-blank-empty" &&
+	git config diff.suppress-blank-empty true &&
+	word_diff --word-diff=plain
+'
+
 test_done

```

## Jim Meyering, 2011-05-21 09:42

Subject: Re: [PATCH] do not read beyond end of malloc'd buffer
Message-ID: <87ei3s75kf.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/87ei3s75kf.fsf%40rho.meyering.net
In-Reply-To: <7vfwo92p19.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

```
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net> writes:
>> I was surprised to see "git diff --word-diff" output a ton of
>> garbage, and tracked it down to a bug that's triggered when the
>> diff.suppress-blank-empty config option to true and when at least
>> one of the context lines is empty.
>
> Heh, I am not that surprised ;-)
>
> I think the real culprit is a year-old 882749a (diff: add --word-diff
> option that generalizes --color-words, 2010-04-14); it probably shows that
> not many people use diff.s-b-e settings?

That must be the issue: too few people know to use diff.s-b-e.
If a few more of us were to set that option by running this command:

    git config --global diff.suppress-blank-empty true

(to suppress emission of trailing blanks on empty context lines)
then bugs like this would be exposed more quickly.

...
> It is a bit unfortunate that we cannot make this into a test script, as it
> depends on what is on the uninitialized part of the heap, which might
> happen to be a NUL in which case the test would pass.
>
> Running tests under the valgrind mode may catch issues, though.

Right, since reading the trailing NUL byte after the
end of the buffer would be detected.

> Thanks. Will queue with this test squashed in.

Thanks for adding the test!

```
