Re: [PATCH] setup: translate symlinks in filename when using absolute paths
2010/12/29 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <carenas@sajinet.com.pe> writes:
>
>> otherwise, comparison to validate against work tree will fail when
>> the path includes a symlink and the name passed is not canonical.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <carenas@sajinet.com.pe>
>
> I take that "path" and "name passed" refer to the same thing (i.e. "path"
> parameter) in the above.
>
> I think you are trying to handle the case where:
>
> - you give "/home/carenas/one" from the command line;
> - $PWD is "/home/carenas"; and
> - "/home/carenas" is a symlink to "/net/host/home/carenas"
>
> and the scan-from-the-beginning-of-string check done between
> "/home/carenas/one" and the return value of get_git_work_tree() which
> presumably is "/net/host/home/carenas" disagrees. I wonder if a more
> correct solution might be to help get_git_work_tree() to match the notion
> of where the repository and its worktree are to the idea of where the user
> thinks they are, i.e. not "/net/host/home/carenas" but "/home/carenas", a
> bit better?
I tend to agree. Will cause less surprises (such as this one).
> That would involve tweaking make_absolute_path() I guess?
Hm.. can we avoid converting work_tree to absolute path unless people explicitly set it (via --work-tree and GIT_WORK_TREE)? Basically worktree will be relative to cwd. Usually it's just ".". When people run commands outside worktree, it's the relative "cwd/to/worktree". I'm wondering if we can just avoid the use of make_absolute_path() completely in get_git_work_tree()..
> Note that your patch is the right thing to do either case, i.e. with or
> without such a change to make_absolute_path(), as the function is used to
> set up the return value from get_git_work_tree(). Anything we compare
> with it should have passed make_absolute_path() at least once.
Yes, I think that should that be done inside normalize_path_copy(), not prefix_path().
>> setup.c | 11 +++++++----
>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Also Carlo, tests should be good for illustration and regression purposes. I know you described in detail in another mail. But mails tend to get lost.
--
Duy