Re: [PATCH 04/14] lib-git-svn.sh: Add check for missing mod_dav_svn module
Show 16 quoted lines
> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> writes:
>> diff --git a/t/lib-git-svn.sh b/t/lib-git-svn.sh
>> index 919d45a..154f3d3 100644
>> --- a/t/lib-git-svn.sh
>> +++ b/t/lib-git-svn.sh
>> @@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ start_httpd () {
>> echo >&2 'SVN_HTTPD_PORT is not defined!'
>> return
>> fi
>> + if test ! -e "$SVN_HTTPD_MODULE_PATH/mod_dav_svn.so"
>> + then
>> + echo >&2 'Apache module "mod_dav_svn.so" not found'
>> + return 1
>> + fi
>
> Others seem to check with "test -f" for things like this.OK, do you want me to send an updated patch?
> Also why "return 1" only on this codepath?
This test, along with t9115-*.sh, t9118-*.sh and t9120-*.sh, have been written in such a way that it can access the svn repo using either file or http urls. By default (SVN_HTTPD_PORT not set), it uses file urls so that, despite it noisily printing to stderr that "SVN_HTTPD_PORT is not defined!", lack of an Apache installation is not a problem. (In fact, I suspect very few people run it with SVN_HTTPD_PORT defined).
So, the initial test (of SVN_HTTPD_PORT) and return is not particularly noteworthy, let alone an error. (Yes I have a patch to remove the message, see below). However, *if* the user requests the test be run with http urls and the mod_sav_svn.so module is missing, then we want to fail the test noisily; thus we return 1.
Note that we could easily reset SVN_HTTPD_PORT and return, thus silently converting to the "use file urls" case, but I don't think that would be acceptable.
The reason I didn't submit the patch to remove the above message is
because I felt I should add a note about how/why you would use the
SVN_HTTPD_PORT variable to the t/README file. However, that started
me thinking about other similar variables like:
SVN_HTTPD_{PATH,MODULE_PATH}, LIB_HTTPD_{PATH,PORT,SSL,DAV,SVN},
GIT_SVN_NO_OPTIMIZE_COMMITS, GIT_TEST_HTTPD, .....
So, that patch never got finished! :-PATB, Ramsay Jones