threads / discuss / 25714

git clone / git pull to USB memory stick (FAT) and symlinks

Subject: git clone / git pull to USB memory stick (FAT) and symlinks

## tl;dr

7 messages between Nov 11, 2010 and Nov 12, 2010.

replies: 6people: 4as markdown or json

Gelonida· Nov 11, 2010, 16:35 UTC · lore
Hi,

For a given project I'd like to have some USB memory sticks, which I'd like to keep up to date.

I thought about cloning a remote git repository onto the stick
and performing
- regular pulls in order to update the USB stick
- occasional pushes in orderto publish changes performed on the stick.
Now my questions:

1.) Ignore skip / symlinks ----------------------------- The git repository might contain symlinks (as it was created on a linux host)

Is there any way to perform a git clone / pull and just skip any symlink in the working directory

2.) Avoiding file permission issues: Is this sufficient ---------------------------------------------------------

I read about some config setting which should avoid problems with the rather limited file permissions on a FAT file system

git config --add core.fileMode false

3.) Any other special config settings ----------------------------------------- Are there any other special preparations to be done fi I'd like to have a non bare git repository on a memory stick.

Thanks for your suggestions
Junio C Hamano· Nov 11, 2010, 17:54 UTC · re: Gelonida · lore

Re: git clone / git pull to USB memory stick (FAT) and symlinks

Gelonida <gelonida@gmail.com> writes:
> I thought about cloning a remote git repository onto the stick
> and performing
> - regular pulls in order to update the USB stick
> - occasional pushes in orderto publish changes performed on the stick.

... missing is the reason why this is done to a USB memory stick. More specifically,...

> 1.) Ignore skip / symlinks
> 2.) Avoiding file permission issues: Is this sufficient

These become non-issues _if_ the reason you are putting this on an USB stick is to safekeep and sneakernet the project data, and are not interested in having a working tree on the stick, which I often find is the use case after grilling people who ask about placing git repositories on an USB stick.

And the commands to interact with such a repository without a working tree are to "push" (into it), and "fetch" (from it). IOW, you do not "pull" into USB stick.

If you do need a working tree on the stick, and the stick has a FAT derived filesystem (which would be the most common), then you would need

> git config --add core.fileMode false
and perhaps "core.symlinks false" also would help
Gelonida· Nov 11, 2010, 18:03 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: git clone / git pull to USB memory stick (FAT) and symlinks

On 11/11/2010 06:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Gelonida <gelonida@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> I thought about cloning a remote git repository onto the stick
>> and performing
>> - regular pulls in order to update the USB stick
>> - occasional pushes in orderto publish changes performed on the stick.
> 
> ... missing is the reason why this is done to a USB memory stick.  More
> specifically,...
The idea is to have a few administrator keys .

These administrator keys would be plugged into network less PCs. (no git installed)

I wanted to use git to use these keys up to date.

As the write speed to USB keys is slow I thought about using git in order to avoid copying wrting already up to date config scripts and tools.

Occasionally one might encounter errors in the setup scripts and fix them immediatel with word pad on the targe system.

Thus the idea to change files directly on the USB key.

When repluging the key nto a development host one could pull / push in order to update the central repositroy and all other users just ahd to pull again to their keys.

I hope this explains why I thought about having
- a non bare repository on a USB stick
- due to historical reasons some sym links might be in the repository.
  thus my question of how to let git ignore these sym links.
   If this is not possible, then I would probably create a new
	symlink-less git repository
Show 20 quoted lines
> 
>> 1.) Ignore skip / symlinks
>> 2.) Avoiding file permission issues: Is this sufficient
> 
> These become non-issues _if_ the reason you are putting this on an USB
> stick is to safekeep and sneakernet the project data, and are not
> interested in having a working tree on the stick, which I often find is
> the use case after grilling people who ask about placing git repositories
> on an USB stick.
> 
> And the commands to interact with such a repository without a working tree
> are to "push" (into it), and "fetch" (from it).  IOW, you do not "pull"
> into USB stick.
> 
> If you do need a working tree on the stick, and the stick has a FAT
> derived filesystem (which would be the most common), then you would need
> 
>> git config --add core.fileMode false
> 
> and perhaps "core.symlinks false" also would help
Gelonida· Nov 11, 2010, 18:09 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: git clone / git pull to USB memory stick (FAT) and symlinks

On 11/11/2010 06:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Gelonida <gelonida@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> 
> If you do need a working tree on the stick, and the stick has a FAT
> derived filesystem (which would be the most common), then you would need
> 
>> git config --add core.fileMode false
> 
> and perhaps "core.symlinks false" also would help
WIll try core,symlinks
Gelonida· Nov 11, 2010, 18:10 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: git clone / git pull to USB memory stick (FAT) and symlinks

On 11/11/2010 06:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Gelonida <gelonida@gmail.com> writes:
> If you do need a working tree on the stick, and the stick has a FAT
> derived filesystem (which would be the most common), then you would need
> 
>> git config --add core.fileMode false
> 
> and perhaps "core.symlinks false" also would help
Thanks:
Will try core.symlinks false
Ferry Huberts· Nov 12, 2010, 15:06 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: git clone / git pull to USB memory stick (FAT) and symlinks

IIRC then a FAT filesystem will screw up your repository. Is that still the case?

We had a few problems with that at work which is why I advised against it.
On 11/11/2010 06:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 30 quoted lines
> Gelonida <gelonida@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I thought about cloning a remote git repository onto the stick
>> and performing
>> - regular pulls in order to update the USB stick
>> - occasional pushes in orderto publish changes performed on the stick.
> ... missing is the reason why this is done to a USB memory stick.  More
> specifically,...
>
>> 1.) Ignore skip / symlinks
>> 2.) Avoiding file permission issues: Is this sufficient
> These become non-issues _if_ the reason you are putting this on an USB
> stick is to safekeep and sneakernet the project data, and are not
> interested in having a working tree on the stick, which I often find is
> the use case after grilling people who ask about placing git repositories
> on an USB stick.
>
> And the commands to interact with such a repository without a working tree
> are to "push" (into it), and "fetch" (from it).  IOW, you do not "pull"
> into USB stick.
>
> If you do need a working tree on the stick, and the stick has a FAT
> derived filesystem (which would be the most common), then you would need
>
>> git config --add core.fileMode false
> and perhaps "core.symlinks false" also would help
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
grtz
-- 
Ferry Huberts
Santi Béjar· Nov 12, 2010, 15:59 UTC · re: Ferry Huberts · lore

Re: git clone / git pull to USB memory stick (FAT) and symlinks

Please, do not toppost.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Ferry Huberts <mailings@hupie.com> wrote:
> IIRC then a FAT filesystem will screw up your repository.
> Is that still the case?
Using very very old git version, yes. But no for newer git. For the repository.

HTH, Santi

← back to recent threads