# [PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes

2 messages from 2010-08-03 to 2010-08-04. Participants: Jon Seymour.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/24614

## Jon Seymour, 2010-08-03 10:42

Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=6k7HcUYWhSi8XDfF0GnAwFdfN6b-ebf87eGSC@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/AANLkTi%3D6k7HcUYWhSi8XDfF0GnAwFdfN6b-ebf87eGSC%40mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik8Npy99jKqUan8wOTXNffBCGwS_WnPwbhXqJYK@mail.gmail.com>

```
| fixed the subject line - sorry !

This series fixes git stash branch so that it is more tolerant of
stash-like commits created with git stash create.

It particular, it doesn't require there to be a stash stack if a
stash-like argument is specified and it doesn't attempt to drop
non-stash references after applying the stash.

This series replaces my previous patch that just included a test
that demonstrated the existance of the issue.

 stash: It looks like a stash, but doesn't quack like a stash...
 stash: Allow git stash branch to process commits that look like
   stashes but are not stash references.
 stash: modify tests to reflect stash branch fixes.

 git-stash.sh     |   10 ++++++++--
 t/t3903-stash.sh |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--
1.7.2.1.111.g8fc90

```

## Jon Seymour, 2010-08-04 22:44

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WDnfT_RQDABpN5Y_EoVWK_SRMa2WSHu8p35Pp@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/AANLkTi%3DWDnfT_RQDABpN5Y_EoVWK_SRMa2WSHu8p35Pp%40mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik8Npy99jKqUan8wOTXNffBCGwS_WnPwbhXqJYK@mail.gmail.com>

```
Hi, does anyone see any reason why this series could not be a
candidate for merging into next or master? If there is some reason for
me to re-post it, let me know.

Regards,

jon.

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> wrote:
> | fixed the subject line - sorry !
>
> This series fixes git stash branch so that it is more tolerant of
> stash-like commits created with git stash create.
>
> It particular, it doesn't require there to be a stash stack if a
> stash-like argument is specified and it doesn't attempt to drop
> non-stash references after applying the stash.
>
> This series replaces my previous patch that just included a test
> that demonstrated the existance of the issue.
>
>  stash: It looks like a stash, but doesn't quack like a stash...
>  stash: Allow git stash branch to process commits that look like
>    stashes but are not stash references.
>  stash: modify tests to reflect stash branch fixes.
>
>  git-stash.sh     |   10 ++++++++--
>  t/t3903-stash.sh |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.2.1.111.g8fc90
>
>
>

```