Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] Documentation/reset: separate options by mode
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes:
Show 28 quoted lines
> Remove all but -q from the OPTIONS section, and instead explain the
> options separated by usage mode, since they only apply to one each.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
>
> fixup! Documentation/reset: separate options by mode
> ---
> Documentation/git-reset.txt | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-reset.txt b/Documentation/git-reset.txt
> index dbb810d..46b2d2a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-reset.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-reset.txt
> @@ -8,29 +8,38 @@ git-reset - Reset current HEAD to the specified state
> SYNOPSIS
> --------
> [verse]
> -'git reset' [--soft | --mixed | --hard | --merge | --keep] [-q] [<commit>]
> 'git reset' [-q] [<commit>] [--] <paths>...
> 'git reset' --patch [<commit>] [--] [<paths>...]
> +'git reset' [--soft | --mixed | --hard | --merge | --keep] [-q] [<commit>]
>
> DESCRIPTION
> -----------
> +Sets the current branch to the specified <commit> and optionally
> +resets the index and working tree to match. The <commit> defaults to
> +HEAD in all forms.
With a careless reading of this paragraph, I got an impression that HEAD is always affected, but I happen to know that is not the case ;-).
- "reset" is primarily about resetting the index and the --soft option
can be used to optionally not to do this.
. with paths, the command is about fixing up the index contents for
given specific paths, to prepare for the next commit. HEAD is not
moved. . without paths, the command is about changing what commit to build
your next commit on, i.e. HEAD is moved.Show 7 quoted lines
> +'git reset' [-q] [<commit>] [--] <paths>...::
> + This form resets the index entries for all <paths> to their
> + state at the <commit>. (It does not affect the worktree, nor
> + the current branch.)
> ++
> +This means that `git reset <paths>` is the opposite of `git add
> +<paths>`, provided that the <paths> were already tracked.
The above is a clearer description of "with-path" mode than what we currently have. I doubt that we need ", provided that...", though.
"git reset HEAD frotz" from a head commit without frotz gets rid of frotz from the index, no?