threads / discuss / 22597

RFC: git sync

Subject: RFC: git sync

## tl;dr

4 messages between Feb 10, 2010 and Feb 10, 2010.

replies: 3people: 3as markdown or json

Larry D'Anna· Feb 10, 2010, 03:27 UTC · lore

So say you have a project with a bunch of branches. You have two main computers you work on: a laptop and a workstation, and you keep an authoritative copy on a server somewhere. When you sit down at your laptop to work on your project, the first thing you want to do is make sure that whatever you've got locally is up-to-date with the repo on the server. So you run:

git push origin :

Then if it says anything isn't a fast-forward, you use some combination of git pull, git checkout, or git fetch to get all you branches up to date, then possibly you run the push again to push merges back to the server.

How about instead we add a new command called "git sync" that does all that for you? So if you say

git sync origin : 

It matches refs just like git-push would, but it will also automatically fast-forward your local refs if possible. (and update the worktree+index if HEAD is one of the local refs that gets fast forwarded). If any merges would be required, it will print a warning and leave that ref alone.

And if you say
git sync --merge origin :

it will try to merge any refs that need it. If the merge succeeds, it will be exactly as if you had said

git checkout foobranch git pull origin foobranch git push origin foobranch

What do you all think? If you like the idea, I'll do it as a builtin. Otherwise I'll just hack up a perl script for myself.

          --larry
Jakub Narebski· Feb 10, 2010, 09:52 UTC · re: Larry D'Anna · lore

Re: RFC: git sync

Larry D'Anna <larry@elder-gods.org> writes:
Show 16 quoted lines
> So say you have a project with a bunch of branches.  You have two main computers
> you work on: a laptop and a workstation, and you keep an authoritative copy on a
> server somewhere.  When you sit down at your laptop to work on your project, the
> first thing you want to do is make sure that whatever you've got locally is
> up-to-date with the repo on the server.  So you run: 
> 
> git push origin :
> 
> Then if it says anything isn't a fast-forward, you use some combination of git
> pull, git checkout, or git fetch to get all you branches up to date, then
> possibly you run the push again to push merges back to the server.
> 
> How about instead we add a new command called "git sync" that does all that for
> you?  So if you say 
> 
> git sync origin : 
[...]
> What do you all think?  If you like the idea, I'll do it as a builtin.
> Otherwise I'll just hack up a perl script for myself.

Why not use the recpie from GitFaq: "How would I use "git push" to sync out of a host that I cannot pull from?" http://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitFaq#How_would_I_use_.22git_push.22_to_sync_out_of_a_host_that_I_cannot_pull_from.3F

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
Sergio· Feb 10, 2010, 16:39 UTC · re: Jakub Narebski · lore

Re: RFC: git sync

> Why not use the recpie from GitFaq:
> "How would I use "git push" to sync out of a host that I cannot pull from?"
>
http://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitFaq#How_would_I_use_.22git_push.22_to_sync_out_of_a_host_that_I_cannot_pull_from.3F
> 

Hi, to follow that recipe with more than one satellite, all sharing the same config, it would be just great to be able to put $hostname in .git-config, e.g.

[remote "mothership"]
   url = <url>
   push = master:refs/remotes/$hostname/master
Would there be any potential problem with that?
Larry D'Anna· Feb 10, 2010, 19:47 UTC · re: Jakub Narebski · lore

Re: RFC: git sync

* Jakub Narebski (jnareb@gmail.com) [100210 04:53]:
> Why not use the recpie from GitFaq:
> "How would I use "git push" to sync out of a host that I cannot pull from?"
> http://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitFaq#How_would_I_use_.22git_push.22_to_sync_out_of_a_host_that_I_cannot_pull_from.3F
Because that has nothing whatsoever to do with the problem I'm trying to solve.

I'm trying to make a common task more automated and convenient. It's not like I don't know how to perform it manually.

      --larry

← back to recent threads