[PATCH] Link git-name-rev and git-symbolic-ref from the main git page

Johannes Schindelin· Oct 27, 2005, 09:57 UTC · lore

According to my checks, these were the only commands not yet linked.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>

---

	Matthias Urlichs wrote:

	> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
	>
	> > [PATCH] Add git-name-rev
	>
	> Please update the "git" manpage when you add a new command.
	> (I bet that others are missing too..?)

	I did not do it right away, because I did not expect that it
	was merged into master *that* fast.

 Documentation/git.txt |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Show changes to Documentation/git.txt +6 −0

diff --git a/Documentation/git.txt b/Documentation/git.txt
index 054f091..6c80e27 100644
--- a/Documentation/git.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git.txt
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ gitlink:git-ls-tree[1]::
 gitlink:git-merge-base[1]::
 	Finds as good a common ancestor as possible for a merge
 
+gitlink:git-name-rev[1]::
+	Find symbolic names for given revs
+
 gitlink:git-rev-list[1]::
 	Lists commit objects in reverse chronological order
 
@@ -360,6 +363,9 @@ gitlink:git-sh-setup[1]::
 	Common git shell script setup code.
 	Previously this command was known as git-sh-setup-script.
 
+gitlink:git-symbolic-ref[1]::
+	Read and modify symbolic refs
+
 gitlink:git-tag[1]::
 	An example script to create a tag object signed with GPG
 	Previously this command was known as git-tag-script.

Junio C Hamano· Oct 28, 2005, 09:14 UTC · re: Johannes Schindelin · lore

Re: [PATCH] Link git-name-rev and git-symbolic-ref from the main git page

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> 	I did not do it right away, because I did not expect that it
> 	was merged into master *that* fast.

Sorry, but I am more inclusive kind than Linus was.

Johannes Schindelin· Oct 28, 2005, 09:36 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: [PATCH] Link git-name-rev and git-symbolic-ref from the main git page

Hi,

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 6 quoted lines

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > 	I did not do it right away, because I did not expect that it
> > 	was merged into master *that* fast.
> 
> Sorry, but I am more inclusive kind than Linus was.

That is wonderful! I only have to learn to test my patches thoroughly before sending them out...

BTW I think I forgot to tell that my recent patch series supersedes what is in pu.

Ciao, Dscho

patchLink git-name-rev and git-symbolic-ref from the main git page