# requesting info page (and pdf) doc releases 5 messages from 2009-10-22 to 2009-10-23. Participants: Sebastian Pipping, Rustom Mody, Michael J Gruber, Junio C Hamano. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/21330 ## Sebastian Pipping, 2009-10-22 20:41 Subject: requesting info page (and pdf) doc releases Message-ID: <4AE0C362.3030900@gentoo.org> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/4AE0C362.3030900%40gentoo.org ``` hi there! would be nice to get info pages (and pdf) doc releases in addition to html and man pages. i imagine such a change to the release machine should not be too hard to integrate. we could use it in gentoo. thanks, sebastian ``` ## Rustom Mody, 2009-10-22 22:13 Subject: Re: requesting info page (and pdf) doc releases Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/f46c52560910221513w1cb19949lfa05ef964987d809%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4AE0C362.3030900@gentoo.org> ``` On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > hi there! > > > would be nice to get info pages (and pdf) doc releases in addition to > html and man pages.  i imagine such a change to the release machine > should not be too hard to integrate.  we could use it in gentoo. > > thanks, > > > > sebastian +1 Why only gentoo? I would use it on ubuntu or windows as well ``` ## Michael J Gruber, 2009-10-23 08:39 Subject: Re: requesting info page (and pdf) doc releases Message-ID: <4AE16BDE.1000103@drmicha.warpmail.net> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/4AE16BDE.1000103%40drmicha.warpmail.net In-Reply-To: ``` Rustom Mody venit, vidit, dixit 23.10.2009 00:13: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> >> hi there! >> >> >> would be nice to get info pages (and pdf) doc releases in addition to >> html and man pages. i imagine such a change to the release machine >> should not be too hard to integrate. we could use it in gentoo. >> >> thanks, >> >> >> >> sebastian > > +1 > Why only gentoo? I would use it on ubuntu or windows as well Because they don't build from source!? ;) Michael ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2009-10-23 18:57 Subject: Re: requesting info page (and pdf) doc releases Message-ID: <7vtyxqaqg5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vtyxqaqg5.fsf%40alter.siamese.dyndns.org In-Reply-To: ``` Rustom Mody writes: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> >> would be nice to get info pages (and pdf) doc releases in addition to >> html and man pages. i imagine such a change to the release machine >> should not be too hard to integrate. we could use it in gentoo. > > +1 > Why only gentoo? I would use it on ubuntu or windows as well As I understand it, Gentoo is supposed to build everything from the source anyway, you would not want to use pregenerated info nor pdf, no? You shouldn't be using pregenerated html nor man for that matter... FWIW, you can already say "make info" and "make pdf" yourselves if you have necessary toolchains installed. Integration is not an issue. Neither my primary development box (Debian, which I would test before pushing things out) nor the machine at k.org I use for the final sanity check (FC11, on which the documents are automatically generated) has dblatex nor docbook2x installed. I am not particularly enthused about installing a lot of dependencies for these packages on my machine. I do not want to bother k.org admins who are already overloaded to install these on their machines either. ``` ## Sebastian Pipping, 2009-10-23 19:22 Subject: Re: requesting info page (and pdf) doc releases Message-ID: <4AE20264.2060207@gentoo.org> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/4AE20264.2060207%40gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <7vtyxqaqg5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> ``` Junio C Hamano wrote: > Rustom Mody writes: > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >>> would be nice to get info pages (and pdf) doc releases in addition to >>> html and man pages. i imagine such a change to the release machine >>> should not be too hard to integrate. we could use it in gentoo. >> +1 >> Why only gentoo? I would use it on ubuntu or windows as well > > As I understand it, Gentoo is supposed to build everything from the source > anyway, you would not want to use pregenerated info nor pdf, no? You > shouldn't be using pregenerated html nor man for that matter... With "compiling" documentation things are a bit different. Simplified, in contrast to source code compiling documentation leads to the same results on all machines while sources produces lots of different results depending on the configuration of the machine ("use flags", compile flags, versions of linked libraries, ..) which differ heavily from one machine to another. Generating documentation downstream means more dependencies for us without any advantages that I would be aware of. In case of dblatex the dependencies get quite extreme actually :-) So we thought why not just ask for it if you provide similar things already. > FWIW, you can already say "make info" and "make pdf" yourselves if you > have necessary toolchains installed. Integration is not an issue. We use make info at the moment. (On a sidenote I hope you get it working with the latest asciidoc again. See my earlier mail on this list.) > Neither my primary development box (Debian, which I would test before > pushing things out) nor the machine at k.org I use for the final sanity > check (FC11, on which the documents are automatically generated) has > dblatex nor docbook2x installed. I am not particularly enthused about > installing a lot of dependencies for these packages on my machine. I do > not want to bother k.org admins who are already overloaded to install > these on their machines either. I see, thanks for your explanation. Sebastian ```