# [PATCH] Remove unused t/t8005/iso8859-5.txt file 4 messages from 2009-08-29 to 2009-08-30. Participants: Nanako Shiraishi, Junio C Hamano. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/20781 ## Nanako Shiraishi, 2009-08-29 07:16 Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused t/t8005/iso8859-5.txt file Message-ID: <20090829161637.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20090829161637.6117%40nanako3.lavabit.com ``` This file is no longer used since commit 54bc13c. Signed-off-by: �����钤���� ��ʒ�ʒ�� --- t/t8005/iso8859-5.txt | Bin 74 -> 0 bytes 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 t/t8005/iso8859-5.txt diff --git a/t/t8005/iso8859-5.txt b/t/t8005/iso8859-5.txt deleted file mode 100644 index 2e4b80c8df4da30722561049c46cca778e49cd2f..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 GIT binary patch literal 0 HcmV?d00001 literal 74 zcmeYa_P4MwwTw57_jB}hwN=`2>B3!w{Z}77xOeHsbA^L9uG|B%l(; URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vy6p3giwf.fsf%40alter.siamese.dyndns.org In-Reply-To: <20090829161637.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> ``` Nanako Shiraishi writes: > This file is no longer used since commit 54bc13c. Hmm, the patch is grossly encoding damaged, so I'll hand apply. Out of curiosity, how did you find this? ``` ## Nanako Shiraishi, 2009-08-29 08:08 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unused t/t8005/iso8859-5.txt file Message-ID: <20090829170809.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20090829170809.6117%40nanako3.lavabit.com In-Reply-To: <7vy6p3giwf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> ``` Quoting Junio C Hamano > Out of curiosity, how did you find this? Soon after you posted your original in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/121881, I applied it to my tree, and I have been running 'git pull --rebase' for ever. I noticed that rebase didn't remove the commit, even after your 54bc13c. Today I found that the rebased patch only removed that file. The real question is how you lost the deletion of the file when you applied. What happened? -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/ ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2009-08-30 20:14 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unused t/t8005/iso8859-5.txt file Message-ID: <7v3a79dpox.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7v3a79dpox.fsf%40alter.siamese.dyndns.org In-Reply-To: <20090829170809.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> ``` Nanako Shiraishi writes: > Quoting Junio C Hamano > >> Out of curiosity, how did you find this? > > Soon after you posted your original in > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/121881, I applied > it to my tree, and I have been running 'git pull --rebase' for ever. I > noticed that rebase didn't remove the commit, even after your 54bc13c. > > Today I found that the rebased patch only removed that file. The real > question is how you lost the deletion of the file when you applied. What > happened? My stupidity, and a little bit of danger in trusting "am -3" blindly. The patch sent to the list was against the master, but the actual commit created, 54bc13c, was on maint. Back then, there was a commit in master but not in maint that stopped using cp1251.txt and started using iso8859-5.txt instead. Because maint did not have iso8859-5.txt (which the patch wanted to remove), when "am -3" did its fake 3-way merge, the removal of the path did not even conflict. It was the case of "neither side wants to have this file". As the result, cp1251.txt was left in the tree (which is half-Ok, even though the updated test never looked at it anymore), and merging the result back to master did not touch iso8859-5.txt. ```