threads / discuss / 20160

Pulled files with "new file" status

Subject: Pulled files with "new file" status

## tl;dr

2 messages between Jul 20, 2009 and Jul 20, 2009.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Marcelo de Moraes Serpa· Jul 20, 2009, 05:45 UTC · lore
Hello,

I just went through an interesting situation and maybe someone could enlighten-me. I pulled and got a conflict. I solved the conflict, git added the file, and committed. I git pulled again and get the updates from a friend, but the intriguing thing is that, the files that he added appeared as "new file" for me too. Why's that? I haven't been the one who added the file, he added it, why git would pull objects and tell me they are new ?

Thanks in advance!
Marcelo.
Johannes Sixt· Jul 20, 2009, 07:40 UTC · re: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa · lore

Re: Pulled files with "new file" status

Marcelo de Moraes Serpa schrieb:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I git pulled again and get the updates
> from a friend, but the intriguing thing is that, the files that he
> added appeared as "new file" for me too. Why's that? I haven't been
> the one who added the file, he added it, why git would pull objects
> and tell me they are new ?
Perhaps because they *are* new for you?
  ------Y--M    <-- you
          /
   ------F      <-- your friend

If F added files, then you pull F, which creates the merge commit M, then the files are also new for *you*.

I assume you were looking at the diff summary that 'git pull' reported. This diff is the difference from Y to M, and in that diff, the files *are* new because they are now in M, but not in Y.

-- Hannes

← back to recent threads