Re: [PATCH] Documentation: minor consistency fixes in git-difftool.txt.
On 0, Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 25.03.2009 08:17:
> > David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> --- a/Documentation/git-difftool.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/git-difftool.txt
> >> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
> >> DESCRIPTION
> >> -----------
> >> 'git-difftool' is a git command that allows you to compare and edit files
> >> -between revisions using common diff tools. 'git difftool' is a frontend
> >> +between revisions using common diff tools. 'git-difftool' is a frontend
> >
> > I thought that the recent trend is to spell these as 'git difftool' (two
> > separate words), although I didn't follow the discussion on quoting styles
> > closely, so I do not know which of sq, dq or backtick is preferred.
> >
> > Can somebody help me out here?
> >
>
> I'd say it's backticks for commands/code, but I think discussion about a
> style guide is still on.
>
> Michael
Cool, I'll keep my eye on it.
I was merely going for consistency with the existing documentation (such as git-mergetool.txt). Once a consensus is reached I'll go ahead and follow suite.
Thanks,
--
David