# [PATCH] Documentation: More examples for git bisect

2 messages from 2009-03-06 to 2009-03-06. Participants: John Tapsell, Christian Couder.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/18171

## John Tapsell, 2009-03-06 09:37

Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: More examples for git bisect
Message-ID: <1236332255-15712-1-git-send-email-johnflux@gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1236332255-15712-1-git-send-email-johnflux%40gmail.com

```
Including passing parameters to the programs, and running more
complicated checks without requiring a seperate shell script.

Signed-off-by: John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/git-bisect.txt |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
index 147ea38..7b8cfdd 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ If you have a script that can tell if the current source code is good
 or bad, you can automatically bisect using:
 
 ------------
-$ git bisect run my_script
+$ git bisect run my_script arguments
 ------------
 
 Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should
@@ -251,6 +251,22 @@ EXAMPLES
 $ git bisect start HEAD v1.2 --      # HEAD is bad, v1.2 is good
 $ git bisect run make                # "make" builds the app
 ------------
++
+This looks for the first revision that fails to build between HEAD and
+the tag 'v1.2'.  
+
+* Automatically bisect a test failure between origin and HEAD:
++
+------------
+$ git bisect start HEAD origin --    # HEAD is bad, origin is good
+$ git bisect run make test           # "make test" builds and tests
+------------
++
+This looks for the first revision that 'make test' fails for, assuming that
+you have such a Makefile rule, and that 'make test' also builds the source code.
+Note however that if the source fails to build, this will be treated as a bad
+commit.  This may not be what you intend, so the following examples instead
+treat build failures as commits to skip.
 
 * Automatically bisect a broken test suite:
 +
@@ -291,6 +307,15 @@ It's safer if both "test.sh" and "check_test_case.sh" scripts are
 outside the repo to prevent interactions between the bisect, make and
 test processes and the scripts.
 
+* Automatically bisect a broken test suite, simplified version:
++
+------------
+$ git bisect start HEAD HEAD~10 --   # culprit is among the last 10
+$ git bisect run sh -c "make || exit 125; ~/check_test_case.sh"
+------------
++
+Does the same as the previous example, but on a single line.
+
 Author
 ------
 Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-- 
1.6.2.97.g034f.dirty

```

## Christian Couder, 2009-03-06 20:08

Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: More examples for git bisect
Message-ID: <200903062108.09758.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/200903062108.09758.chriscool%40tuxfamily.org
In-Reply-To: <1236332255-15712-1-git-send-email-johnflux@gmail.com>

```
Le vendredi 6 mars 2009, John Tapsell a écrit :
> Including passing parameters to the programs, and running more
> complicated checks without requiring a seperate shell script.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/git-bisect.txt |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> index 147ea38..7b8cfdd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ If you have a script that can tell if the current
> source code is good or bad, you can automatically bisect using:
>
>  ------------
> -$ git bisect run my_script
> +$ git bisect run my_script arguments
>  ------------
>
>  Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should
> @@ -251,6 +251,22 @@ EXAMPLES
>  $ git bisect start HEAD v1.2 --      # HEAD is bad, v1.2 is good
>  $ git bisect run make                # "make" builds the app
>  ------------
> ++
> +This looks for the first revision that fails to build between HEAD and
> +the tag 'v1.2'.

There are a few trailing spaces in the above line but otherwise the patch 
looks good to me.

Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>

By the way, it would be nice if you could put me in CC.

Thanks,
Christian.

```
