# Gitk - Seeing just a specific remote ?

3 messages from 2009-03-06 to 2009-03-08. Participants: Aneesh Bhasin, Johannes Sixt.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/18168

## Aneesh Bhasin, 2009-03-06 05:58

Subject: Gitk - Seeing just a specific remote ?
Message-ID: <f662f0210903052158q77aa0f2fo92c4f4a09c13780e@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/f662f0210903052158q77aa0f2fo92c4f4a09c13780e%40mail.gmail.com

```
Hi All,

I have a git repository (say, new_develop) in which a remote
repository (say old_develop) is also there of some older work with the
associated remote branches. Is there a way to see all  the branches of
only this remote older_develop repository graphically in gitk -
something that shows me the same thing that doing a 'gitk --all' would
have shown had I done it from the older_develop repository itself ? If
I say 'gitk --all' (in new_develop) it shows me all the branches
(local as well as remote). Specifying 'gitk --remotes' also shows all
the remote branches (not just from the old_develop remote repo) ? Is
there some other way that I am missing ? I have seen the man page of
git-rev-list too but there doesn't sem to be a way to do it.

Regards,
Aneesh

```

## Johannes Sixt, 2009-03-06 08:04

Subject: Re: Gitk - Seeing just a specific remote ?
Message-ID: <49B0D8FD.6070807@viscovery.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/49B0D8FD.6070807%40viscovery.net
In-Reply-To: <f662f0210903052158q77aa0f2fo92c4f4a09c13780e@mail.gmail.com>

```
Aneesh Bhasin schrieb:
> I have a git repository (say, new_develop) in which a remote
> repository (say old_develop) is also there of some older work with the
> associated remote branches. Is there a way to see all  the branches of
> only this remote older_develop repository graphically in gitk -
> something that shows me the same thing that doing a 'gitk --all' would
> have shown had I done it from the older_develop repository itself ? If
> I say 'gitk --all' (in new_develop) it shows me all the branches
> (local as well as remote). Specifying 'gitk --remotes' also shows all
> the remote branches (not just from the old_develop remote repo) ? Is
> there some other way that I am missing ? I have seen the man page of
> git-rev-list too but there doesn't sem to be a way to do it.

gitk has an option, --argscmd, that you can use:

  gitk --argscmd="git for-each-ref --format='%(refname)'
refs/remotes/old_develop/*"

-- Hannes

```

## Aneesh Bhasin, 2009-03-08 13:01

Subject: Re: Gitk - Seeing just a specific remote ?
Message-ID: <f662f0210903080601g4c637fcbqcf62435a3922349f@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/f662f0210903080601g4c637fcbqcf62435a3922349f%40mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <49B0D8FD.6070807@viscovery.net>

```
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
> Aneesh Bhasin schrieb:
>> I have a git repository (say, new_develop) in which a remote
>> repository (say old_develop) is also there of some older work with the
>> associated remote branches. Is there a way to see all  the branches of
>> only this remote older_develop repository graphically in gitk -
>> something that shows me the same thing that doing a 'gitk --all' would
>> have shown had I done it from the older_develop repository itself ? If
>> I say 'gitk --all' (in new_develop) it shows me all the branches
>> (local as well as remote). Specifying 'gitk --remotes' also shows all
>> the remote branches (not just from the old_develop remote repo) ? Is
>> there some other way that I am missing ? I have seen the man page of
>> git-rev-list too but there doesn't sem to be a way to do it.
>
> gitk has an option, --argscmd, that you can use:
>
>  gitk --argscmd="git for-each-ref --format='%(refname)'
> refs/remotes/old_develop/*"
>

Thanks. That was exactly what I was looking for.

```
