threads / patch / 17328

patchgittutorial: remove misleading note

Subject: [PATCH] gittutorial: remove misleading note

## tl;dr

3 messages between Jan 23, 2009 and Jan 23, 2009. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 2people: 2as markdown or json

Miklos Vajna· Jan 23, 2009, 18:02 UTC · lore

In the tutorial Alice initializes the repository, and Bob clones it. So Bob can just do a 'git pull', but Alice will need 'git pull <url> <branch>'.

The note suggested that the branch parameter is not necessary, which is no longer true these days.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
---
The problem was reported by DanC on IRC.
 Documentation/gittutorial.txt |    4 +---
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Show changes to Documentation/gittutorial.txt +1 −3
diff --git a/Documentation/gittutorial.txt b/Documentation/gittutorial.txt
index 458fafd..c5d5596 100644
--- a/Documentation/gittutorial.txt
+++ b/Documentation/gittutorial.txt
@@ -308,9 +308,7 @@ alice$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master
 
 This merges the changes from Bob's "master" branch into Alice's
 current branch.  If Alice has made her own changes in the meantime,
-then she may need to manually fix any conflicts.  (Note that the
-"master" argument in the above command is actually unnecessary, as it
-is the default.)
+then she may need to manually fix any conflicts.
 
 The "pull" command thus performs two operations: it fetches changes
 from a remote branch, then merges them into the current branch.
-- 
1.6.1
Junio C Hamano· Jan 23, 2009, 19:00 UTC · re: Miklos Vajna · lore

Re: [PATCH] gittutorial: remove misleading note

Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> In the tutorial Alice initializes the repository, and Bob clones it. So
> Bob can just do a 'git pull', but Alice will need 'git pull <url>
> <branch>'.
>
> The note suggested that the branch parameter is not necessary, which is
> no longer true these days.

So we have a usability regression here. Perhaps we need to fix that instead?

Miklos Vajna· Jan 23, 2009, 21:17 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: [PATCH] gittutorial: remove misleading note

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:00:18AM -0800, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> So we have a usability regression here.  Perhaps we need to fix that
> instead?
I thought that's on purpose.

By doing a 'git fetch <url>' I don't say "what" to fetch, just "from where".

Would it be better to fetch HEAD in that case?

← back to recent threads