TortoiseGit
Li FrankYou post nothing!
Em 2008/12/14, às 09:47, Li Frank escreveu:
> You post nothing!
I'm used to send a first email to subscribe to some mailing list. I'm sorry for that.
I wanted to suggest you to have your main git repo in github.com, that is like a social network of opensource projects. It's also free, and it will give the project more exposition, that may mean more contributors.
Just a suggestion ;)
Alcides Fonseca
Tim VisherOn Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Alcides Fonseca <me@alcidesfonseca.com> wrote:
> have your main git repo in github.com
+1
-- In Christ, Timmy V. http://burningones.com/ http://five.sentenc.es/ - Spend less time on e-mail
Li FrankWhat's better github compared with repos.or.cz.
2008/12/15 Tim Visher <tim.visher@gmail.com>:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Alcides Fonseca <me@alcidesfonseca.com> wrote: > >> have your main git repo in github.com > > +1 > > -- > > In Christ, > > Timmy V. > > http://burningones.com/ > http://five.sentenc.es/ - Spend less time on e-mail >
Junio C Hamano"Li Frank" <lznuaa@gmail.com> writes:
> What's better github compared with repos.or.cz.
People just wanted to have it on some publicly accessible site. repo.or.cz should be just fine, I think.
Geoffrey LeeOn Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Li Frank <lznuaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's better github compared with repos.or.cz.
Github projects come with a wiki, and you can watch the project for changes. If you are only concerned about having your source code publicly accessible, then repo.or.cz is perfectly fine.
Regardless of whether or not you migrate to github, I recommend that you setup mailing lists for announcements, users, and devs.
-Geoffrey Lee
Junio C Hamano"Geoffrey Lee" <geoffreyj.lee@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Li Frank <lznuaa@gmail.com> wrote: >> What's better github compared with repos.or.cz. > > Github projects come with a wiki,...
That cuts both ways. Most development around git happen on this list and taking a project's development discussion away from here will hide it from the mainstream development. People involved in TortoiseGit may decide that asking for some change in the core is a good idea on their own Wiki, and after spending significant amount of effort come back to this list with a request for change, which may turn out to be suboptimal (or worse, impossible) solution, and you can avoid such wasted effort by keeping the discussion on list here.
Geoffrey LeeOn Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> That cuts both ways. Most development around git happen on this list and > taking a project's development discussion away from here will hide it from > the mainstream development. People involved in TortoiseGit may decide > that asking for some change in the core is a good idea on their own Wiki, > and after spending significant amount of effort come back to this list > with a request for change, which may turn out to be suboptimal (or worse, > impossible) solution, and you can avoid such wasted effort by keeping the > discussion on list here.
We ended up creating: http://groups.google.com/group/tortoisegit-users http://groups.google.com/group/tortoisegit-dev http://groups.google.com/group/tortoisegit-announce
Although I believe Frank wanted to keep discussion on here for now until our growth warrants a separate list.
-Geoffrey Lee