# Help merging two repo without connection 3 messages from 2008-11-16 to 2008-11-16. Participants: Luca Siciliano Viglieri, Sverre Rabbelier, Peter Harris. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/16352 ## Luca Siciliano Viglieri, 2008-11-16 14:59 Subject: Help merging two repo without connection Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/AB681AEE-D229-4F1C-8D7B-8E60E0ED8E96%40web.de ``` Hi, i'm trying to keep synched two repositories without always having a direct connection. My situation is the following: I have a project on my computer with GIT repo. Another developer visited me and cloned my repository connecting the two computer (for example via SSH). Than i sent him for the next days patched of my changes but when he came and we merged i got the following tree: / -------------------------------------------(my patch)--(my second patch)--\ / \ -- (first commit) -- (second commit ) (merge ) -- \ / \ (my patch)--(my second patch)--------------------------------------------/ I don't thinks its right to have double (or more?) commits. I would have expected something like: -- (first commit) -- (second commit) -- (my patch)--(my second patch) -- (merge?) -- The patches were created with git-format-patch and merged with git-am. I know that the commits have different sha1 but how can i keep with patches or something similar the two repositories exactly synched? Thanks Luca Siciliano ``` ## Sverre Rabbelier, 2008-11-16 15:06 Subject: Re: Help merging two repo without connection Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/bd6139dc0811160706l4dfad335wc4048cd3cfca80ec%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: ``` On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 15:59, Luca Siciliano Viglieri wrote: > Hi, > i'm trying to keep synched two repositories without always having a direct > connection. > My situation is the following: > I have a project on my computer with GIT repo. > Another developer visited me and cloned my repository connecting the two > computer (for example via SSH). > Than i sent him for the next days patched of my changes but when he came and > we merged i got the following tree: I suspect 'git rebase' might help you out. When you apply the patches, apply them to the branch they were based off (instead of to the most recent master), and then rebase -that- branch (with your 'git am'-ed patches from your other box) onto your most recent master. That way you should be able to keep a linear history :). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier ``` ## Peter Harris, 2008-11-16 15:33 Subject: Re: Help merging two repo without connection Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/eaa105840811160733s18be2705l60806b1bf40b1743%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: ``` On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Luca Siciliano Viglieri wrote: > Hi, > i'm trying to keep synched two repositories without always having a direct > connection. ... > I don't thinks its right to have double (or more?) commits. I would have > expected something like: > > > -- (first commit) -- (second commit) -- (my patch)--(my second patch) -- > (merge?) -- > > > The patches were created with git-format-patch and merged with git-am. > I know that the commits have different sha1 but how can i keep with patches > or something similar the two repositories exactly synched? If you use "git bundle" instead of format-patch, you will have an unreadable binary blob instead of a human-readable patch, but the sha1s will not change (since the commiter information will be the same). The remote side will "git pull" the bundle file instead of "git am"ing it. Peter Harris ```