# [PATCH] pack-objects: don't include missing preferred base objects

3 messages from 2008-09-02 to 2008-09-02. Participants: Nicolas Pitre.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/15330

## Nicolas Pitre, 2008-09-02 14:22

Subject: [PATCH] sha1write: don't copy full sized buffers
Message-ID: <1220365342-21308-1-git-send-email-nico@cam.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1220365342-21308-1-git-send-email-nico%40cam.org

```
No need to memcpy() source buffer data when we might just process the
data in place instead of accumulating it into a separate buffer.
This is the case when a whole buffer would have been copied, summed,
written out and then discarded right away.

Also move the CRC32 processing within the loop so the data is more likely
to remain in the L1 CPU cache between the CRC32 sum, SHA1 sum and the
write call.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
---
 csum-file.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/csum-file.c b/csum-file.c
index 2838954..bb70c75 100644
--- a/csum-file.c
+++ b/csum-file.c
@@ -11,10 +11,8 @@
 #include "progress.h"
 #include "csum-file.h"
 
-static void sha1flush(struct sha1file *f, unsigned int count)
+static void sha1flush(struct sha1file *f, void *buf, unsigned int count)
 {
-	void *buf = f->buffer;
-
 	for (;;) {
 		int ret = xwrite(f->fd, buf, count);
 		if (ret > 0) {
@@ -39,7 +37,7 @@ int sha1close(struct sha1file *f, unsigned char *result, unsigned int flags)
 
 	if (offset) {
 		SHA1_Update(&f->ctx, f->buffer, offset);
-		sha1flush(f, offset);
+		sha1flush(f, f->buffer, offset);
 		f->offset = 0;
 	}
 	SHA1_Final(f->buffer, &f->ctx);
@@ -47,7 +45,7 @@ int sha1close(struct sha1file *f, unsigned char *result, unsigned int flags)
 		hashcpy(result, f->buffer);
 	if (flags & (CSUM_CLOSE | CSUM_FSYNC)) {
 		/* write checksum and close fd */
-		sha1flush(f, 20);
+		sha1flush(f, f->buffer, 20);
 		if (flags & CSUM_FSYNC)
 			fsync_or_die(f->fd, f->name);
 		if (close(f->fd))
@@ -62,21 +60,30 @@ int sha1close(struct sha1file *f, unsigned char *result, unsigned int flags)
 
 int sha1write(struct sha1file *f, void *buf, unsigned int count)
 {
-	if (f->do_crc)
-		f->crc32 = crc32(f->crc32, buf, count);
 	while (count) {
 		unsigned offset = f->offset;
 		unsigned left = sizeof(f->buffer) - offset;
 		unsigned nr = count > left ? left : count;
+		void *data;
+
+		if (f->do_crc)
+			f->crc32 = crc32(f->crc32, buf, nr);
+
+		if (nr == sizeof(f->buffer)) {
+			/* process full buffer directly without copy */
+			data = buf;
+		} else {
+			memcpy(f->buffer + offset, buf, nr);
+			data = f->buffer;
+		}
 
-		memcpy(f->buffer + offset, buf, nr);
 		count -= nr;
 		offset += nr;
 		buf = (char *) buf + nr;
 		left -= nr;
 		if (!left) {
-			SHA1_Update(&f->ctx, f->buffer, offset);
-			sha1flush(f, offset);
+			SHA1_Update(&f->ctx, data, offset);
+			sha1flush(f, data, offset);
 			offset = 0;
 		}
 		f->offset = offset;
-- 
1.6.0.1.276.g59b81

```

## Nicolas Pitre, 2008-09-02 14:22

Subject: [PATCH] pack-objects: don't include missing preferred base objects
Message-ID: <1220365342-21308-2-git-send-email-nico@cam.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1220365342-21308-2-git-send-email-nico%40cam.org
In-Reply-To: <1220365342-21308-1-git-send-email-nico@cam.org>

```
This improves commit 6d6f9cddbe a bit by simply not including missing
bases in the list of objects to process at all.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
---
 builtin-pack-objects.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin-pack-objects.c b/builtin-pack-objects.c
index ba2cf00..e16b7e8 100644
--- a/builtin-pack-objects.c
+++ b/builtin-pack-objects.c
@@ -1725,6 +1725,14 @@ static void prepare_pack(int window, int depth)
 			if (entry->type < 0)
 				die("unable to get type of object %s",
 				    sha1_to_hex(entry->idx.sha1));
+		} else {
+			if (entry->type < 0) {
+				/*
+				 * This object is not found, but we
+				 * don't have to include it anyway.
+				 */
+				continue;
+			}
 		}
 
 		delta_list[n++] = entry;
-- 
1.6.0.1.276.g59b81

```

## Nicolas Pitre, 2008-09-02 14:22

Subject: [PATCH] t5300: improve SHA1 collision test
Message-ID: <1220365342-21308-3-git-send-email-nico@cam.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1220365342-21308-3-git-send-email-nico%40cam.org
In-Reply-To: <1220365342-21308-2-git-send-email-nico@cam.org>

```
Make sure the reason for the command failure is actually due to
the detection of SHA1 collision.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
---
 t/t5300-pack-object.sh |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t5300-pack-object.sh b/t/t5300-pack-object.sh
index 83abe5f..8a8b0f1 100755
--- a/t/t5300-pack-object.sh
+++ b/t/t5300-pack-object.sh
@@ -272,7 +272,8 @@ test_expect_success \
 
 test_expect_success \
     'make sure index-pack detects the SHA1 collision' \
-    'test_must_fail git-index-pack -o bad.idx test-3.pack'
+    'test_must_fail git-index-pack -o bad.idx test-3.pack 2>msg &&
+     grep "SHA1 COLLISION FOUND" msg'
 
 test_expect_success \
     'honor pack.packSizeLimit' \
-- 
1.6.0.1.276.g59b81

```
