threads / discuss / 15308

git gc can require using a *huge* amount of space

Subject: git gc can require using a *huge* amount of space

## tl;dr

One message between Sep 1, 2008 and Sep 1, 2008.

replies: 0people: 1as markdown or json

Theodore Ts'o· Sep 1, 2008, 01:22 UTC · lore

One of the things which I noticed which can be a bit of a misfeature is if you are trying to save disk space by running "git gc", it can sometimes take *substantially* more disk space. For example, I ran "git reflog --all --expire=0 --expire-unreachable=0" on a repository that had linux-next as one of its remotes. Before I ran "git gc --prune" the repository was packed, and its .git/objects was a bit over 50 megs (there was an alternates file). While I was running the "git gc", it was busy ejecting all of the objects that were no longer reachable separate files, and the size of .git/objects ballooned to over 200 megs, before settling in at 150 megs or so after "git gc" completed. After I ran "git prune", the size of .git/objects shrank back down to 48 megs.

That kind of swing in disk usage seems a bit excessive.... maybe instead of pushing out all of the no-longer-reachable objects into separate files, they could be put in a separate pack file (which the user could then delete much more quickly than it would take "git prune" to run)?

     	     	      	   	       	     - Ted

← back to recent threads