threads / discuss / 14848

do without .netrc

Subject: do without .netrc

## tl;dr

6 messages between Aug 5, 2008 and Aug 8, 2008.

replies: 5people: 3as markdown or json

Jürgen Mangler· Aug 5, 2008, 23:00 UTC · lore

"git clone http://a:b@donatello.pri.univie.ac.at/repositories/0/Data/" is not working

also "git clone http://a@donatello.pri.univie.ac.at/repositories/0/Data/" is not asking for password. is it supposed to?

it is working without a:b@ part, but ~/.netrc instead
:-(, is it possible without .netrc
git version 1.5.4.3
thanks, regards
Jürgen
Miklos Vajna· Aug 6, 2008, 08:50 UTC · re: Jürgen Mangler · lore

Re: do without .netrc

On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 01:00:54AM +0200, Jürgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@univie.ac.at> wrote:
> it is working without a:b@ part, but ~/.netrc instead
> 
> :-(, is it possible without .netrc
I thought questions have question marks. ;-)
Anyway, what is the advantage of not using a ~/.netrc?
Michael J Gruber· Aug 6, 2008, 09:17 UTC · re: Miklos Vajna · lore

Re: do without .netrc

Miklos Vajna venit, vidit, dixit 06.08.2008 10:50:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 01:00:54AM +0200, Jürgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@univie.ac.at> wrote:
>> it is working without a:b@ part, but ~/.netrc instead
>>
>> :-(, is it possible without .netrc
> 
> I thought questions have question marks. ;-)
> 
> Anyway, what is the advantage of not using a ~/.netrc?
Not having the password on disk[?!]
Michael
Miklos Vajna· Aug 6, 2008, 10:50 UTC · re: Michael J Gruber · lore

Re: do without .netrc

On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:17:48AM +0200, Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+gmane@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Not having the password on disk[?!]
I think you can't avoid so (we are talking about http).

There is no such thing as ssh-agent for http, and typing the password for each pull or push is boring. (OK, this is subjective, but I think nobody types his/her pass on every push/pull.)

You could have the password in the URL, but the it's in .git/config, even worse.

Jürgen Mangler· Aug 6, 2008, 11:28 UTC · re: Miklos Vajna · lore

Re: do without .netrc

Miklos Vajna wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 01:00:54AM +0200, Jürgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@univie.ac.at> wrote:
>> it is working without a:b@ part, but ~/.netrc instead
>>
>> :-(, is it possible without .netrc
> 
> I thought questions have question marks. ;-)

Explanation 1: I wrote it to IRC and then thought maybe crossposting to the list would be no bad idea. On IRC i was not using question marks, mail was just copying the lines, forgot to add question marks.

Explanation 2: its not questions but accusations! *fg*
> Anyway, what is the advantage of not using a ~/.netrc?

It's mentioned on several occations that it is not necessary (e.g. http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/howto/setup-git-server-over-http.txt)

The advantages for me would be:

a) I have multiple different passwords on the same server for different directories, it's not possible to put this to a netrc (AS FAR AS I KNOW). So i have to edit the netrc for every push, clone, ... -> very inconvenient b) secondly (maybe not a super valid argument for you): netrc is not considered to be the most secure thing, isn't it? Our network is invaded every year "tested" by thousands of computer science students, so i always try to have as few plain-text passwords as possible lying around (one never knows - yes netrc has 0600).

i'd also prefer not to use the user:pass@server schema, but to be asked, to not show pass in the history and config file in .git although even user:pass@server would be an advantage because it solves a).

Jürgen
Jürgen Mangler· Aug 8, 2008, 15:36 UTC · re: Jürgen Mangler · lore

Re: do without .netrc

Show 15 quoted lines
> The advantages for me would be:
> 
> a) I have multiple different passwords on the same server for different 
> directories, it's not possible to put this to a netrc (AS FAR AS I 
> KNOW). So i have to edit the netrc for every push, clone, ... -> very 
> inconvenient
> b) secondly (maybe not a super valid argument for you): netrc is not 
> considered to be the most secure thing, isn't it? Our network is invaded 
> every year "tested" by thousands of computer science students, so i 
> always try to have as few plain-text passwords as possible lying around 
> (one never knows - yes netrc has 0600).
> 
> i'd also prefer not to use the user:pass@server schema, but to be asked, 
> to not show pass in the history and config file in .git although even 
> user:pass@server would be an advantage because it solves a).
Valid solutions would therefore include:
* allow http://user@server urls, and ask user for password (A-rated)
* provide for http.basic.user and http.basic.pass in .git/config file 
(B-rated, one has to take care about the security of his config file)
* allow http://user:pass@server urls (C-rated, the consequences have 
been discussed on this list several times)
Jürgen

← back to recent threads