Re: qgit-0.81
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Marco Costalba wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
>
> Some little new stuff too, complete changelog below:
>
> - added move back/forward in selection history
>
> - added "hyperlinks" SHA1's in commit messages
Ok, this is nicer than gitk, with the parents showing up in the commit message and thus easy to go to. You might add children too: it's not something git itself knows about intrisically, but since you've already built the graph, at least you see what children are part of that graph..
Oh, and do people really care _that_ much when the change happened? That's a lot of screen real estate wasted on the date stamp of "last change". At least I can drag it to the right and hide it that way..
A couple of quick comments:
- Any chance of having a git archive of qgit? I realize that sourceforge
doesn't have git archives, but (a) maybe you can ask and (b) maybe
there are alternate places you could put it. It's just sad having to
download tar-balls.
- The qgit graph is not as pretty as the gitk one. Any chance of making
the bullets a bit smaller, and having an option to not do the
"jump-over-bumps"?
- the "file annotation" window is nice, but it _really_ shouldn't do line
wrapping. If you make the window narrower, you'll see it wrap and look
horrible.. Are all text windows always wrapped in QT?
- You edit the commit comments heavily, and have no options to unedit.
For example, I need the emails in the sign-offs if I ever cut-and-paste
to an email client when I sent a "hey, this commit broke so-and-so.."
- the "format a patch to be sent as email" thing says "at least two
revisions needed" when you only have one. Why? One of my more common
cases is that I send one commit as a patch, and now I do
git-diff-tree -p --pretty [commit-id] > ~/diff
and then just send that. A single commit _does_ describe a valid patch,
after all.
No biggie,
Linus
